Cargando…

Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine whether stone density on plain radiography (kidney-ureter-bladder, KUB) could predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 223 patients treated by ESWL for radio-opaque ureteral stone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Ki Hong, Jung, Jin-Hee, Kwon, Jae Hyun, Lee, Yong Seok, Bae, Jungbum, Cho, Min Chul, Lee, Kwang Soo, Lee, Hae Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.56
_version_ 1782352772365025280
author Lim, Ki Hong
Jung, Jin-Hee
Kwon, Jae Hyun
Lee, Yong Seok
Bae, Jungbum
Cho, Min Chul
Lee, Kwang Soo
Lee, Hae Won
author_facet Lim, Ki Hong
Jung, Jin-Hee
Kwon, Jae Hyun
Lee, Yong Seok
Bae, Jungbum
Cho, Min Chul
Lee, Kwang Soo
Lee, Hae Won
author_sort Lim, Ki Hong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective was to determine whether stone density on plain radiography (kidney-ureter-bladder, KUB) could predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 223 patients treated by ESWL for radio-opaque ureteral stones of 5 to 20 mm were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent routine blood and urine analyses, plain radiography (KUB), and noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) before ESWL. Demographic, stone, and radiological characteristics on KUB and NCCT were analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups: lower-density (LD) group (radiodensity less than or equal to that of the 12th rib, n=163) and higher-density (HD) group (radiodensity greater than that of the 12th rib, n=60). Stone-free status was assessed by KUB every week after ESWL. A successful outcome was defined as stone free within 1 month after ESWL. RESULTS: Mean stone size in the LD group was significantly smaller than that in the HD group (7.5±1.4 mm compared with 9.9±2.9 mm, p=0.002). The overall success rates in the LD and HD groups were 82.1% and 60.0%, respectively (p=0.007). The mean duration of stone-free status and average number of SWL sessions required for success in the two groups were 21.7 compared with 39.2 days and 1.8 compared with 2.3, respectively (p<0.05). On multivariate logistic analysis, stone size and time to ESWL since colic and radiodensity of the stone on KUB were independent predictors of successful ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that larger stone size, longer time to ESWL, and ureteral stones with a radiodensity greater than that of the 12th rib may be at a relatively higher risk of ESWL failure 1 month after the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4294856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42948562015-01-16 Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Lim, Ki Hong Jung, Jin-Hee Kwon, Jae Hyun Lee, Yong Seok Bae, Jungbum Cho, Min Chul Lee, Kwang Soo Lee, Hae Won Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The objective was to determine whether stone density on plain radiography (kidney-ureter-bladder, KUB) could predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 223 patients treated by ESWL for radio-opaque ureteral stones of 5 to 20 mm were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent routine blood and urine analyses, plain radiography (KUB), and noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) before ESWL. Demographic, stone, and radiological characteristics on KUB and NCCT were analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups: lower-density (LD) group (radiodensity less than or equal to that of the 12th rib, n=163) and higher-density (HD) group (radiodensity greater than that of the 12th rib, n=60). Stone-free status was assessed by KUB every week after ESWL. A successful outcome was defined as stone free within 1 month after ESWL. RESULTS: Mean stone size in the LD group was significantly smaller than that in the HD group (7.5±1.4 mm compared with 9.9±2.9 mm, p=0.002). The overall success rates in the LD and HD groups were 82.1% and 60.0%, respectively (p=0.007). The mean duration of stone-free status and average number of SWL sessions required for success in the two groups were 21.7 compared with 39.2 days and 1.8 compared with 2.3, respectively (p<0.05). On multivariate logistic analysis, stone size and time to ESWL since colic and radiodensity of the stone on KUB were independent predictors of successful ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that larger stone size, longer time to ESWL, and ureteral stones with a radiodensity greater than that of the 12th rib may be at a relatively higher risk of ESWL failure 1 month after the procedure. The Korean Urological Association 2015-01 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4294856/ /pubmed/25598937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.56 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Ki Hong
Jung, Jin-Hee
Kwon, Jae Hyun
Lee, Yong Seok
Bae, Jungbum
Cho, Min Chul
Lee, Kwang Soo
Lee, Hae Won
Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
title Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
title_full Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
title_fullStr Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
title_full_unstemmed Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
title_short Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
title_sort can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.56
work_keys_str_mv AT limkihong canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT jungjinhee canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT kwonjaehyun canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT leeyongseok canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT baejungbum canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT chominchul canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT leekwangsoo canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones
AT leehaewon canstonedensityonplainradiographypredicttheoutcomeofextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyforureteralstones