Cargando…

Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system

BACKGROUND: Expandable screws have greater pullout strength than conventional screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability provided by a new built-in expandable anterior spinal fixation system with that of 2 commonly used anterior fixation systems, the Z-Plate and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Chu-Song, Xu, Yan-Fang, Zhang, Yu, Chen, Zhong, Lv, Hai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25496488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-424
_version_ 1782352820896268288
author Zhou, Chu-Song
Xu, Yan-Fang
Zhang, Yu
Chen, Zhong
Lv, Hai
author_facet Zhou, Chu-Song
Xu, Yan-Fang
Zhang, Yu
Chen, Zhong
Lv, Hai
author_sort Zhou, Chu-Song
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Expandable screws have greater pullout strength than conventional screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability provided by a new built-in expandable anterior spinal fixation system with that of 2 commonly used anterior fixation systems, the Z-Plate and the Kaneda, in a porcine partial vertebral corpectomy model. METHODS: Eighteen porcine thoracolumbar spine specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 6 each. A vertebral wedge osteotomy was performed by removing the anterior 2/3 of the L1 vertebral body and the T15/L1 disc. Vertebrae were fixed with the Z-Plate, Kaneda, or expandable fixation system. The 3-dimensional spinal range of motion (ROM) of specimens in the intact state (prior to osteotomy), injured state (after osteotomy), and after internal fixation were recorded. The pullout strength and maximum torque of common anterior screws, the expandable anterior fixation screw unexpanded, and the expandable anterior fixation screw expanded was tested. RESULTS: After internal fixation, the expandable device and Z-plate system exhibited higher left bending motion than the Kaneda system (5.50° and 5.37° vs. 5.04, p = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively), and the Z-plate and Kaneda groups had significantly higher left axial and right axial rotation ROM as compared to the expandable device group (left axial rotation: 5.23° and 5.02° vs. 4.53°; right axial rotation: 5.23° and 5.08° vs. 4.49°). The maximum insertion torque of the expandable device was significantly greater than of a common screw (5.10 vs. 3.75 Ns). The maximum pullout force of the expandable device expanded was significantly higher than that of the common screw and the expandable device unexpanded (3,035.48 N vs. 1,827.38 N and 2,333.49 N). CONCLUSIONS: The built-in anterior fixation system provides better axial rotational stability as compared to the other 2 systems, and greater maximum torque and pullout strength than a common fixation screw. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-424) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4295300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42953002015-01-16 Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system Zhou, Chu-Song Xu, Yan-Fang Zhang, Yu Chen, Zhong Lv, Hai BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Expandable screws have greater pullout strength than conventional screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability provided by a new built-in expandable anterior spinal fixation system with that of 2 commonly used anterior fixation systems, the Z-Plate and the Kaneda, in a porcine partial vertebral corpectomy model. METHODS: Eighteen porcine thoracolumbar spine specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 6 each. A vertebral wedge osteotomy was performed by removing the anterior 2/3 of the L1 vertebral body and the T15/L1 disc. Vertebrae were fixed with the Z-Plate, Kaneda, or expandable fixation system. The 3-dimensional spinal range of motion (ROM) of specimens in the intact state (prior to osteotomy), injured state (after osteotomy), and after internal fixation were recorded. The pullout strength and maximum torque of common anterior screws, the expandable anterior fixation screw unexpanded, and the expandable anterior fixation screw expanded was tested. RESULTS: After internal fixation, the expandable device and Z-plate system exhibited higher left bending motion than the Kaneda system (5.50° and 5.37° vs. 5.04, p = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively), and the Z-plate and Kaneda groups had significantly higher left axial and right axial rotation ROM as compared to the expandable device group (left axial rotation: 5.23° and 5.02° vs. 4.53°; right axial rotation: 5.23° and 5.08° vs. 4.49°). The maximum insertion torque of the expandable device was significantly greater than of a common screw (5.10 vs. 3.75 Ns). The maximum pullout force of the expandable device expanded was significantly higher than that of the common screw and the expandable device unexpanded (3,035.48 N vs. 1,827.38 N and 2,333.49 N). CONCLUSIONS: The built-in anterior fixation system provides better axial rotational stability as compared to the other 2 systems, and greater maximum torque and pullout strength than a common fixation screw. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-424) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4295300/ /pubmed/25496488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-424 Text en © Zhou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Chu-Song
Xu, Yan-Fang
Zhang, Yu
Chen, Zhong
Lv, Hai
Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
title Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
title_full Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
title_fullStr Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
title_short Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
title_sort biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25496488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-424
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouchusong biomechanicaltestingofauniquebuiltinexpandableanteriorspinalinternalfixationsystem
AT xuyanfang biomechanicaltestingofauniquebuiltinexpandableanteriorspinalinternalfixationsystem
AT zhangyu biomechanicaltestingofauniquebuiltinexpandableanteriorspinalinternalfixationsystem
AT chenzhong biomechanicaltestingofauniquebuiltinexpandableanteriorspinalinternalfixationsystem
AT lvhai biomechanicaltestingofauniquebuiltinexpandableanteriorspinalinternalfixationsystem