Cargando…

Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements

BACKGROUND: Despite a high prevalence of herbal and dietary supplement use (HDS) in pre-dialysis patients, the reasons are unknown as to why they decide to use HDS. Objectives of the cross-sectional and qualitative studies were to determine reasons for the use and non-use of HDS in Thai patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tangkiatkumjai, Mayuree, Boardman, Helen, Praditpornsilpa, Kearkiat, Walker, Dawn-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-473
_version_ 1782352853300412416
author Tangkiatkumjai, Mayuree
Boardman, Helen
Praditpornsilpa, Kearkiat
Walker, Dawn-Marie
author_facet Tangkiatkumjai, Mayuree
Boardman, Helen
Praditpornsilpa, Kearkiat
Walker, Dawn-Marie
author_sort Tangkiatkumjai, Mayuree
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite a high prevalence of herbal and dietary supplement use (HDS) in pre-dialysis patients, the reasons are unknown as to why they decide to use HDS. Objectives of the cross-sectional and qualitative studies were to determine reasons for the use and non-use of HDS in Thai patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This prospective study recruited 421 patients with stage 3–5 CKD from two kidney clinics in Thailand, and 357 were followed up regarding their HDS use over 12 months. Patients receiving renal replacement therapy at baseline were excluded. Participants were interviewed at baseline and in the twelfth month regarding their HDS use, and reasons for their use or non-use of HDS. Among HDS users, 16 patients were enrolled in a qualitative study and were interviewed using eight-open ended questions about reasons for HDS use. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of patients with CKD consistently used HDS over the 12 months and 17% of all patients intermittently took them during the follow-up period. At baseline, family or friends’ recommendation was the most common reason for HDS use (35%), followed by having a perception of benefits from using HDS (24%). During the follow-up period, perceived benefits of HDS was a frequently reported reason for either continuing with HDS use (85%) or starting to use HDS (65%). Negative experience from using HDS influenced patients to stop using them (19%). Although the main reason for non-use of HDS was trust in a doctor or effectiveness of conventional medicine (32%), doubt about the benefits from HDS or concerns about negative effects were frequently reported reasons for non-use (23%). Doctor’s recommendations to avoid using HDS were the main influence for non-users (19%) and for those who had stopped using HDS (23%). The media and patients’ social network had an impact on HDS use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who perceived benefits from HDS use were more likely to use HDS, whilst non-users had negative attitudes towards HDS. Health professionals therefore should educate patients and their relatives about the risks and benefits from using HDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4295480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42954802015-01-16 Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements Tangkiatkumjai, Mayuree Boardman, Helen Praditpornsilpa, Kearkiat Walker, Dawn-Marie BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite a high prevalence of herbal and dietary supplement use (HDS) in pre-dialysis patients, the reasons are unknown as to why they decide to use HDS. Objectives of the cross-sectional and qualitative studies were to determine reasons for the use and non-use of HDS in Thai patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This prospective study recruited 421 patients with stage 3–5 CKD from two kidney clinics in Thailand, and 357 were followed up regarding their HDS use over 12 months. Patients receiving renal replacement therapy at baseline were excluded. Participants were interviewed at baseline and in the twelfth month regarding their HDS use, and reasons for their use or non-use of HDS. Among HDS users, 16 patients were enrolled in a qualitative study and were interviewed using eight-open ended questions about reasons for HDS use. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of patients with CKD consistently used HDS over the 12 months and 17% of all patients intermittently took them during the follow-up period. At baseline, family or friends’ recommendation was the most common reason for HDS use (35%), followed by having a perception of benefits from using HDS (24%). During the follow-up period, perceived benefits of HDS was a frequently reported reason for either continuing with HDS use (85%) or starting to use HDS (65%). Negative experience from using HDS influenced patients to stop using them (19%). Although the main reason for non-use of HDS was trust in a doctor or effectiveness of conventional medicine (32%), doubt about the benefits from HDS or concerns about negative effects were frequently reported reasons for non-use (23%). Doctor’s recommendations to avoid using HDS were the main influence for non-users (19%) and for those who had stopped using HDS (23%). The media and patients’ social network had an impact on HDS use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who perceived benefits from HDS use were more likely to use HDS, whilst non-users had negative attitudes towards HDS. Health professionals therefore should educate patients and their relatives about the risks and benefits from using HDS. BioMed Central 2014-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4295480/ /pubmed/25481733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-473 Text en © Tangkiatkumjai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tangkiatkumjai, Mayuree
Boardman, Helen
Praditpornsilpa, Kearkiat
Walker, Dawn-Marie
Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
title Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
title_full Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
title_fullStr Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
title_full_unstemmed Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
title_short Reasons why Thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
title_sort reasons why thai patients with chronic kidney disease use or do not use herbal and dietary supplements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25481733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-473
work_keys_str_mv AT tangkiatkumjaimayuree reasonswhythaipatientswithchronickidneydiseaseuseordonotuseherbalanddietarysupplements
AT boardmanhelen reasonswhythaipatientswithchronickidneydiseaseuseordonotuseherbalanddietarysupplements
AT praditpornsilpakearkiat reasonswhythaipatientswithchronickidneydiseaseuseordonotuseherbalanddietarysupplements
AT walkerdawnmarie reasonswhythaipatientswithchronickidneydiseaseuseordonotuseherbalanddietarysupplements