Cargando…

Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Mammography is considered the best imaging technique for breast cancer screening, and the radiographer plays an important role in its performance. Therefore, continuing education is critical to improving the performance of these professionals and thus providing better health care service...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreira, Inês C, Ventura, Sandra Rua, Ramos, Isabel, Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25560547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3344
_version_ 1782352933350801408
author Moreira, Inês C
Ventura, Sandra Rua
Ramos, Isabel
Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
author_facet Moreira, Inês C
Ventura, Sandra Rua
Ramos, Isabel
Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
author_sort Moreira, Inês C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mammography is considered the best imaging technique for breast cancer screening, and the radiographer plays an important role in its performance. Therefore, continuing education is critical to improving the performance of these professionals and thus providing better health care services. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop an e-learning course on breast imaging for radiographers, assessing its efficacy, effectiveness, and user satisfaction. METHODS: A stratified randomized controlled trial was performed with radiographers and radiology students who already had mammography training, using pre- and post-knowledge tests, and satisfaction questionnaires. The primary outcome was the improvement in test results (percentage of correct answers), using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: A total of 54 participants were assigned to the intervention (20 students plus 34 radiographers) with 53 controls (19+34). The intervention was completed by 40 participants (11+29), with 4 (2+2) discontinued interventions, and 10 (7+3) lost to follow-up. Differences in the primary outcome were found between intervention and control: 21 versus 4 percentage points (pp), P<.001. Stratified analysis showed effect in radiographers (23 pp vs 4 pp; P=.004) but was unclear in students (18 pp vs 5 pp; P=.098). Nonetheless, differences in students’ posttest results were found (88% vs 63%; P=.003), which were absent in pretest (63% vs 63%; P=.106). The per-protocol analysis showed a higher effect (26 pp vs 2 pp; P<.001), both in students (25 pp vs 3 pp; P=.004) and radiographers (27 pp vs 2 pp; P<.001). Overall, 85% were satisfied with the course, and 88% considered it successful. CONCLUSIONS: This e-learning course is effective, especially for radiographers, which highlights the need for continuing education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4296101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42961012015-01-21 Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial Moreira, Inês C Ventura, Sandra Rua Ramos, Isabel Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Mammography is considered the best imaging technique for breast cancer screening, and the radiographer plays an important role in its performance. Therefore, continuing education is critical to improving the performance of these professionals and thus providing better health care services. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop an e-learning course on breast imaging for radiographers, assessing its efficacy, effectiveness, and user satisfaction. METHODS: A stratified randomized controlled trial was performed with radiographers and radiology students who already had mammography training, using pre- and post-knowledge tests, and satisfaction questionnaires. The primary outcome was the improvement in test results (percentage of correct answers), using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: A total of 54 participants were assigned to the intervention (20 students plus 34 radiographers) with 53 controls (19+34). The intervention was completed by 40 participants (11+29), with 4 (2+2) discontinued interventions, and 10 (7+3) lost to follow-up. Differences in the primary outcome were found between intervention and control: 21 versus 4 percentage points (pp), P<.001. Stratified analysis showed effect in radiographers (23 pp vs 4 pp; P=.004) but was unclear in students (18 pp vs 5 pp; P=.098). Nonetheless, differences in students’ posttest results were found (88% vs 63%; P=.003), which were absent in pretest (63% vs 63%; P=.106). The per-protocol analysis showed a higher effect (26 pp vs 2 pp; P<.001), both in students (25 pp vs 3 pp; P=.004) and radiographers (27 pp vs 2 pp; P<.001). Overall, 85% were satisfied with the course, and 88% considered it successful. CONCLUSIONS: This e-learning course is effective, especially for radiographers, which highlights the need for continuing education. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4296101/ /pubmed/25560547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3344 Text en ©Inês C Moreira, Sandra Rua Ventura, Isabel Ramos, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.01.2015. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Moreira, Inês C
Ventura, Sandra Rua
Ramos, Isabel
Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
title Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Development and Assessment of an E-Learning Course on Breast Imaging for Radiographers: A Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort development and assessment of an e-learning course on breast imaging for radiographers: a stratified randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25560547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3344
work_keys_str_mv AT moreirainesc developmentandassessmentofanelearningcourseonbreastimagingforradiographersastratifiedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT venturasandrarua developmentandassessmentofanelearningcourseonbreastimagingforradiographersastratifiedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramosisabel developmentandassessmentofanelearningcourseonbreastimagingforradiographersastratifiedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rodriguespedropereira developmentandassessmentofanelearningcourseonbreastimagingforradiographersastratifiedrandomizedcontrolledtrial