Cargando…

Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique

BACKGROUND: The established methods of nerve location were based on either proper motor response on nerve stimulation (NS) or ultrasound guidance. In this prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study, we compared ultrasound guidance with NS for axillary brachial plexus block using 0.5% bupivacain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Alok, Sharma, DK, Sibi, Maj. E, Datta, Barun, Gogoi, Biraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624532
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.147138
_version_ 1782352963260383232
author Kumar, Alok
Sharma, DK
Sibi, Maj. E
Datta, Barun
Gogoi, Biraj
author_facet Kumar, Alok
Sharma, DK
Sibi, Maj. E
Datta, Barun
Gogoi, Biraj
author_sort Kumar, Alok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The established methods of nerve location were based on either proper motor response on nerve stimulation (NS) or ultrasound guidance. In this prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study, we compared ultrasound guidance with NS for axillary brachial plexus block using 0.5% bupivacaine with the multiple injection techniques. METHODS: A total of 120 patients receiving axillary brachial plexus block with 0.5% bupivacaine, using a multiple injection technique, were randomly allocated to receive either NS (group NS, n = 60), or ultrasound guidance (group US, n = 60) for nerve location. A blinded observer recorded the onset of sensory and motor blocks, skin punctures, needle redirections, procedure-related pain and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The median (range) number of skin punctures were 2 (2–4) in group US and 3 (2–5) in group NS (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in the onset of sensory block in group NS (6.17 ± 1.22 min) and in group US (6.33 ± 0.48 min) (P = 0.16), and in onset of motor block (23.33 ± 1.26 min) in group US and (23.17 ± 1.79 min) in group NS; P > =0.27). Insufficient block was observed in three patient (5%) of group US and four patients (6.67%) of group NS (P > =0.35). Patient acceptance was similarly good in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Multiple injection axillary blocks with ultrasound guidance provided similar success rates and comparable incidence of complications as compared with NS guidance with 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4296353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42963532015-01-26 Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique Kumar, Alok Sharma, DK Sibi, Maj. E Datta, Barun Gogoi, Biraj Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: The established methods of nerve location were based on either proper motor response on nerve stimulation (NS) or ultrasound guidance. In this prospective, randomised, observer-blinded study, we compared ultrasound guidance with NS for axillary brachial plexus block using 0.5% bupivacaine with the multiple injection techniques. METHODS: A total of 120 patients receiving axillary brachial plexus block with 0.5% bupivacaine, using a multiple injection technique, were randomly allocated to receive either NS (group NS, n = 60), or ultrasound guidance (group US, n = 60) for nerve location. A blinded observer recorded the onset of sensory and motor blocks, skin punctures, needle redirections, procedure-related pain and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The median (range) number of skin punctures were 2 (2–4) in group US and 3 (2–5) in group NS (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in the onset of sensory block in group NS (6.17 ± 1.22 min) and in group US (6.33 ± 0.48 min) (P = 0.16), and in onset of motor block (23.33 ± 1.26 min) in group US and (23.17 ± 1.79 min) in group NS; P > =0.27). Insufficient block was observed in three patient (5%) of group US and four patients (6.67%) of group NS (P > =0.35). Patient acceptance was similarly good in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Multiple injection axillary blocks with ultrasound guidance provided similar success rates and comparable incidence of complications as compared with NS guidance with 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4296353/ /pubmed/25624532 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.147138 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Kumar, Alok
Sharma, DK
Sibi, Maj. E
Datta, Barun
Gogoi, Biraj
Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
title Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
title_full Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
title_fullStr Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
title_short Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
title_sort comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624532
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.147138
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaralok comparisonofperipheralnervestimulatorversusultrasonographyguidedaxillaryblockusingmultipleinjectiontechnique
AT sharmadk comparisonofperipheralnervestimulatorversusultrasonographyguidedaxillaryblockusingmultipleinjectiontechnique
AT sibimaje comparisonofperipheralnervestimulatorversusultrasonographyguidedaxillaryblockusingmultipleinjectiontechnique
AT dattabarun comparisonofperipheralnervestimulatorversusultrasonographyguidedaxillaryblockusingmultipleinjectiontechnique
AT gogoibiraj comparisonofperipheralnervestimulatorversusultrasonographyguidedaxillaryblockusingmultipleinjectiontechnique