Cargando…

Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to cephalometrically assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Class II malocclusion treatment performed with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample comprised 25 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Jones...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Mayara Paim, Henriques, José Fernando Castanha, de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore, Grec, Roberto Henrique da Costa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar
_version_ 1782353016152653824
author Patel, Mayara Paim
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Grec, Roberto Henrique da Costa
author_facet Patel, Mayara Paim
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Grec, Roberto Henrique da Costa
author_sort Patel, Mayara Paim
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to cephalometrically assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Class II malocclusion treatment performed with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample comprised 25 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances, at a mean initial age of 12.90 years old. The mean time of the entire orthodontic treatment was 3.89 years. The distalization phase lasted for 0.85 years, after which the fixed appliance was used for 3.04 years. Cephalograms were used at initial (T(1)), post-distalization (T(2)) and final phases of treatment (T(3)). For intragroup comparison of the three phases evaluated, dependent ANOVA and Tukey tests were used. RESULTS: Jones Jig appliance did not interfere in the maxillary and mandibular component and did not change maxillomandibular relationship. Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss, mesialization and significant extrusion of first and second premolars, as well as a significant increase in anterior face height at the end of treatment. The majority of adverse effects that occur during intraoral distalization are subsequently corrected during corrective mechanics. Buccal inclination and protrusion of mandibular incisors were identified. By the end of treatment, correction of overjet and overbite was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss represented by significant mesial movement and extrusion of first and second premolars, in addition to a significant increase in anterior face height.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4296629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42966292015-01-26 Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment Patel, Mayara Paim Henriques, José Fernando Castanha de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore Grec, Roberto Henrique da Costa Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to cephalometrically assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Class II malocclusion treatment performed with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances. METHODS: The sample comprised 25 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances, at a mean initial age of 12.90 years old. The mean time of the entire orthodontic treatment was 3.89 years. The distalization phase lasted for 0.85 years, after which the fixed appliance was used for 3.04 years. Cephalograms were used at initial (T(1)), post-distalization (T(2)) and final phases of treatment (T(3)). For intragroup comparison of the three phases evaluated, dependent ANOVA and Tukey tests were used. RESULTS: Jones Jig appliance did not interfere in the maxillary and mandibular component and did not change maxillomandibular relationship. Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss, mesialization and significant extrusion of first and second premolars, as well as a significant increase in anterior face height at the end of treatment. The majority of adverse effects that occur during intraoral distalization are subsequently corrected during corrective mechanics. Buccal inclination and protrusion of mandibular incisors were identified. By the end of treatment, correction of overjet and overbite was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Jones Jig appliance promoted distalization of first molars with anchorage loss represented by significant mesial movement and extrusion of first and second premolars, in addition to a significant increase in anterior face height. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4296629/ /pubmed/25162565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar Text en © 2014 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Mayara Paim
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Grec, Roberto Henrique da Costa
Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_full Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_fullStr Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_full_unstemmed Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_short Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
title_sort cephalometric effects of the jones jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in class ii malocclusion treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.044-051.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT patelmayarapaim cephalometriceffectsofthejonesjigappliancefollowedbyfixedappliancesinclassiimalocclusiontreatment
AT henriquesjosefernandocastanha cephalometriceffectsofthejonesjigappliancefollowedbyfixedappliancesinclassiimalocclusiontreatment
AT defreitaskarinamariasalvatore cephalometriceffectsofthejonesjigappliancefollowedbyfixedappliancesinclassiimalocclusiontreatment
AT grecrobertohenriquedacosta cephalometriceffectsofthejonesjigappliancefollowedbyfixedappliancesinclassiimalocclusiontreatment