Cargando…
Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar |
_version_ | 1782353016618221568 |
---|---|
author | Jakob, Sérgio Ricardo Matheus, Davison Jimenez-Pellegrin, Maria Cristina Turssi, Cecília Pedroso do Amaral, Flávia Lucisano Botelho |
author_facet | Jakob, Sérgio Ricardo Matheus, Davison Jimenez-Pellegrin, Maria Cristina Turssi, Cecília Pedroso do Amaral, Flávia Lucisano Botelho |
author_sort | Jakob, Sérgio Ricardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used for each model. They were bonded to an aluminum prototype that allowed the simulation of four misalignment situations (n = 10). Three of these situations occurred at the initial phase (in which a 0.016-in nickel-titanium wire was used): 1. horizontal; 2. vertical; and 3. simultaneous horizontal/vertical. One of the situations occurred at the final treatment phase: 4. no misalignment (in which a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel rectangular wire was used). The wires slipped through the brackets and friction was measured by a Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) were applied to assess the results. Significant interaction (p < 0.01) among groups was found. For the tests that simulated initial alignment, Ovation(®) bracket produced the highest friction. The two self-ligating models resulted in lower and similar values, except for the horizontal situation, in which In-Ovation C(®) showed lower friction, which was similar to the In-Ovation R(®) metallic model. For the no misalignment situation, the same results were observed. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating system was superior to the conventional one due to producing less friction. With regard to the material used for manufacturing the brackets, the In-Ovation C(®) ceramic model showed less friction than the metallic ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4296631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42966312015-01-26 Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions Jakob, Sérgio Ricardo Matheus, Davison Jimenez-Pellegrin, Maria Cristina Turssi, Cecília Pedroso do Amaral, Flávia Lucisano Botelho Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC). METHODS: Five brackets were used for each model. They were bonded to an aluminum prototype that allowed the simulation of four misalignment situations (n = 10). Three of these situations occurred at the initial phase (in which a 0.016-in nickel-titanium wire was used): 1. horizontal; 2. vertical; and 3. simultaneous horizontal/vertical. One of the situations occurred at the final treatment phase: 4. no misalignment (in which a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel rectangular wire was used). The wires slipped through the brackets and friction was measured by a Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) were applied to assess the results. Significant interaction (p < 0.01) among groups was found. For the tests that simulated initial alignment, Ovation(®) bracket produced the highest friction. The two self-ligating models resulted in lower and similar values, except for the horizontal situation, in which In-Ovation C(®) showed lower friction, which was similar to the In-Ovation R(®) metallic model. For the no misalignment situation, the same results were observed. CONCLUSION: The self-ligating system was superior to the conventional one due to producing less friction. With regard to the material used for manufacturing the brackets, the In-Ovation C(®) ceramic model showed less friction than the metallic ones. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4296631/ /pubmed/25162570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar Text en © 2014 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jakob, Sérgio Ricardo Matheus, Davison Jimenez-Pellegrin, Maria Cristina Turssi, Cecília Pedroso do Amaral, Flávia Lucisano Botelho Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
title | Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional
interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
title_full | Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional
interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional
interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional
interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
title_short | Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional
interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
title_sort | comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional
interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakobsergioricardo comparativestudyoffrictionbetweenmetallicandconventionalinteractiveselfligatingbracketsindifferentalignmentconditions AT matheusdavison comparativestudyoffrictionbetweenmetallicandconventionalinteractiveselfligatingbracketsindifferentalignmentconditions AT jimenezpellegrinmariacristina comparativestudyoffrictionbetweenmetallicandconventionalinteractiveselfligatingbracketsindifferentalignmentconditions AT turssiceciliapedroso comparativestudyoffrictionbetweenmetallicandconventionalinteractiveselfligatingbracketsindifferentalignmentconditions AT doamaralflavialucisanobotelho comparativestudyoffrictionbetweenmetallicandconventionalinteractiveselfligatingbracketsindifferentalignmentconditions |