Cargando…

Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II

INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric radiographs are traditionally required for orthodontic treatment, yet rarely used to assess asymmetries. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to use lateral cephalometric radiographs to identify existing skeletal and dentoalveolar morphological altera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meloti, Aparecida Fernanda, Gonçalves, Renata de Cássia, Silva, Ertty, Martins, Lídia Parsekian, dos Santos-Pinto, Ary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.080-088.oar
_version_ 1782353018499366912
author Meloti, Aparecida Fernanda
Gonçalves, Renata de Cássia
Silva, Ertty
Martins, Lídia Parsekian
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary
author_facet Meloti, Aparecida Fernanda
Gonçalves, Renata de Cássia
Silva, Ertty
Martins, Lídia Parsekian
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary
author_sort Meloti, Aparecida Fernanda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric radiographs are traditionally required for orthodontic treatment, yet rarely used to assess asymmetries. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to use lateral cephalometric radiographs to identify existing skeletal and dentoalveolar morphological alterations in Class II subdivision and to compare them with the existing morphology in Class I and II relationship. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety initial lateral cephalometric radiographs of male and female Brazilian children aged between 12 to 15 years old were randomly and proportionally divided into three groups: Group 1 (Class I), Group 2 (Class II) and Group 3 (Class II subdivision). Analysis of lateral cephalometric radiographs included angular measurements, horizontal linear measurements and two indexes of asymmetry that were prepared for this study. RESULTS: In accordance with an Index of Dental Asymmetry (IDA), greater mandibular dental asymmetry was identified in Group 3. An Index of Mandibular Asymmetry (IMA) revealed less skeletal and dental mandibular asymmetry in Group 2, greater skeletal mandibular asymmetry in Group 1, and greater mandibular dental asymmetry in Group 3. CONCLUSION: Both IDA and IMA revealed greater mandibular dental asymmetry for Group 3 in comparison to Groups 1 and 2. These results are in accordance with those found by other diagnostic methods, showing that lateral cephalometric radiography is an acceptable method to identify existing skeletal and dentoalveolar morphological alterations in malocclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4296639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42966392015-01-26 Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II Meloti, Aparecida Fernanda Gonçalves, Renata de Cássia Silva, Ertty Martins, Lídia Parsekian dos Santos-Pinto, Ary Dental Press J Orthod Original Article INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric radiographs are traditionally required for orthodontic treatment, yet rarely used to assess asymmetries. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to use lateral cephalometric radiographs to identify existing skeletal and dentoalveolar morphological alterations in Class II subdivision and to compare them with the existing morphology in Class I and II relationship. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety initial lateral cephalometric radiographs of male and female Brazilian children aged between 12 to 15 years old were randomly and proportionally divided into three groups: Group 1 (Class I), Group 2 (Class II) and Group 3 (Class II subdivision). Analysis of lateral cephalometric radiographs included angular measurements, horizontal linear measurements and two indexes of asymmetry that were prepared for this study. RESULTS: In accordance with an Index of Dental Asymmetry (IDA), greater mandibular dental asymmetry was identified in Group 3. An Index of Mandibular Asymmetry (IMA) revealed less skeletal and dental mandibular asymmetry in Group 2, greater skeletal mandibular asymmetry in Group 1, and greater mandibular dental asymmetry in Group 3. CONCLUSION: Both IDA and IMA revealed greater mandibular dental asymmetry for Group 3 in comparison to Groups 1 and 2. These results are in accordance with those found by other diagnostic methods, showing that lateral cephalometric radiography is an acceptable method to identify existing skeletal and dentoalveolar morphological alterations in malocclusions. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4296639/ /pubmed/25279525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.080-088.oar Text en © 2014 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Meloti, Aparecida Fernanda
Gonçalves, Renata de Cássia
Silva, Ertty
Martins, Lídia Parsekian
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary
Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II
title Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II
title_full Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II
title_fullStr Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II
title_full_unstemmed Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II
title_short Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II
title_sort lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in angle class ii subdivision compared to class i and ii
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.080-088.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT melotiaparecidafernanda lateralcephalometricdiagnosisofasymmetryinangleclassiisubdivisioncomparedtoclassiandii
AT goncalvesrenatadecassia lateralcephalometricdiagnosisofasymmetryinangleclassiisubdivisioncomparedtoclassiandii
AT silvaertty lateralcephalometricdiagnosisofasymmetryinangleclassiisubdivisioncomparedtoclassiandii
AT martinslidiaparsekian lateralcephalometricdiagnosisofasymmetryinangleclassiisubdivisioncomparedtoclassiandii
AT dossantospintoary lateralcephalometricdiagnosisofasymmetryinangleclassiisubdivisioncomparedtoclassiandii