Cargando…

Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to develop a method to assess the changes in palatal and lingual cross-sectional areas in patients submitted to rapid maxillary expansion (RME). METHODS: The sample comprised 31 Class I malocclusion individuals submitted to RME and divided into two groups treated with H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melgaço, Camilo Aquino, Columbano, José, Jurach, Estela Maris, Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves, Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti, Nojima, Lincoln Issamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25715721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.088-096.oar
_version_ 1782353023649972224
author Melgaço, Camilo Aquino
Columbano, José
Jurach, Estela Maris
Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
Nojima, Lincoln Issamu
author_facet Melgaço, Camilo Aquino
Columbano, José
Jurach, Estela Maris
Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
Nojima, Lincoln Issamu
author_sort Melgaço, Camilo Aquino
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aims to develop a method to assess the changes in palatal and lingual cross-sectional areas in patients submitted to rapid maxillary expansion (RME). METHODS: The sample comprised 31 Class I malocclusion individuals submitted to RME and divided into two groups treated with Haas (17 patients) and Hyrax (14 patients) expanders. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were acquired at T(0) (before expansion ) and T(1) (six months after screw stabilization). Maxillary and mandibular cross-sectional areas were assessed at first permanent molars and first premolars regions and compared at T(0) and T(1). Mandibular occlusal area was also analyzed. RESULTS: Maxillary cross-sectional areas increased in 56.18 mm(2) and 44.32 mm(2) for the posterior and anterior regions. These values were smaller for the mandible, representing augmentation of 40.32 mm(2) and 39.91 mm(2) for posterior and anterior sections. No differences were found when comparing both expanders. Mandibular occlusal area increased 43.99mm(2) and mandibular incisors proclined. Increments of 1.74 mm and 1.7 mm occurred in mandibular intermolar and interpremolar distances. These same distances presented increments of 5.5 mm and 5.57 mm for the maxillary arch. CONCLUSION: Occlusal and cross-sectional areas increased significantly after RME. The method described seems to be reliable and precise to assess intraoral area changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4296661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42966612015-01-26 Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography Melgaço, Camilo Aquino Columbano, José Jurach, Estela Maris Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti Nojima, Lincoln Issamu Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: This study aims to develop a method to assess the changes in palatal and lingual cross-sectional areas in patients submitted to rapid maxillary expansion (RME). METHODS: The sample comprised 31 Class I malocclusion individuals submitted to RME and divided into two groups treated with Haas (17 patients) and Hyrax (14 patients) expanders. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were acquired at T(0) (before expansion ) and T(1) (six months after screw stabilization). Maxillary and mandibular cross-sectional areas were assessed at first permanent molars and first premolars regions and compared at T(0) and T(1). Mandibular occlusal area was also analyzed. RESULTS: Maxillary cross-sectional areas increased in 56.18 mm(2) and 44.32 mm(2) for the posterior and anterior regions. These values were smaller for the mandible, representing augmentation of 40.32 mm(2) and 39.91 mm(2) for posterior and anterior sections. No differences were found when comparing both expanders. Mandibular occlusal area increased 43.99mm(2) and mandibular incisors proclined. Increments of 1.74 mm and 1.7 mm occurred in mandibular intermolar and interpremolar distances. These same distances presented increments of 5.5 mm and 5.57 mm for the maxillary arch. CONCLUSION: Occlusal and cross-sectional areas increased significantly after RME. The method described seems to be reliable and precise to assess intraoral area changes. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4296661/ /pubmed/25715721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.088-096.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Melgaço, Camilo Aquino
Columbano, José
Jurach, Estela Maris
Nojima, Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves
Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
Nojima, Lincoln Issamu
Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
title Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
title_full Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
title_fullStr Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
title_full_unstemmed Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
title_short Rapid maxillary expansion effects: An alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
title_sort rapid maxillary expansion effects: an alternative assessment method by means of cone-beam tomography
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25715721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.088-096.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT melgacocamiloaquino rapidmaxillaryexpansioneffectsanalternativeassessmentmethodbymeansofconebeamtomography
AT columbanojose rapidmaxillaryexpansioneffectsanalternativeassessmentmethodbymeansofconebeamtomography
AT jurachestelamaris rapidmaxillaryexpansioneffectsanalternativeassessmentmethodbymeansofconebeamtomography
AT nojimamatildedacunhagoncalves rapidmaxillaryexpansioneffectsanalternativeassessmentmethodbymeansofconebeamtomography
AT santannaeduardofranzotti rapidmaxillaryexpansioneffectsanalternativeassessmentmethodbymeansofconebeamtomography
AT nojimalincolnissamu rapidmaxillaryexpansioneffectsanalternativeassessmentmethodbymeansofconebeamtomography