Cargando…
Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults
Introduction Hearing screening allows the identification of individuals with hearing loss. Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a portable hearing screening device in middle-aged and older adults using the manufacturer scoring and a scoring system proposed by the researchers. Methods ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Publicações Ltda
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1358660 |
_version_ | 1782353071907536896 |
---|---|
author | Cardoso, Carolina Louise Bós, Ângelo José Gonçalves Gonçalves, Andréa Krüger Olchik, Maira Rozenfeld Flores, Leticia Sousa Seimetz, Bruna Macagnin Bauer, Magda Aline Coradini, Patricia Pérez Teixeira, Adriane Ribeiro |
author_facet | Cardoso, Carolina Louise Bós, Ângelo José Gonçalves Gonçalves, Andréa Krüger Olchik, Maira Rozenfeld Flores, Leticia Sousa Seimetz, Bruna Macagnin Bauer, Magda Aline Coradini, Patricia Pérez Teixeira, Adriane Ribeiro |
author_sort | Cardoso, Carolina Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Hearing screening allows the identification of individuals with hearing loss. Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a portable hearing screening device in middle-aged and older adults using the manufacturer scoring and a scoring system proposed by the researchers. Methods In this transversal study, participants underwent anamnesis, otoscopy, and hearing screening using portable equipment. After this, a pure tone audiometry was performed, with participants classified into two groups: with and without hearing loss. The sensitivity and specificity of the hearing screening were calculated for the right and left ears using two methods of interpretation: the original method recommended by the manufacturer (criteria 1) and the method proposed by researchers (criteria 2). Results The sample consisted of 55 individuals, 83.6% (n = 46) of whom were women. Per criteria 1, the sensitivities were 26.3 (right ear) and 21.4% (left ear). The specificity was 100% for both ears. Using criteria 2, the sensitivity was 94.7 (right ear) and 100% (left ear). The specificity was 74.3 (right ear) and 65.9% (left ear). Conclusion This study showed that the criteria proposed by the manufacturer presented low sensitivity in the hearing screening. The criteria proposed by the researchers to achieve a more efficient performance reached high and balanced values for sensitivity and specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4296949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Thieme Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42969492015-05-19 Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Cardoso, Carolina Louise Bós, Ângelo José Gonçalves Gonçalves, Andréa Krüger Olchik, Maira Rozenfeld Flores, Leticia Sousa Seimetz, Bruna Macagnin Bauer, Magda Aline Coradini, Patricia Pérez Teixeira, Adriane Ribeiro Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Article Introduction Hearing screening allows the identification of individuals with hearing loss. Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a portable hearing screening device in middle-aged and older adults using the manufacturer scoring and a scoring system proposed by the researchers. Methods In this transversal study, participants underwent anamnesis, otoscopy, and hearing screening using portable equipment. After this, a pure tone audiometry was performed, with participants classified into two groups: with and without hearing loss. The sensitivity and specificity of the hearing screening were calculated for the right and left ears using two methods of interpretation: the original method recommended by the manufacturer (criteria 1) and the method proposed by researchers (criteria 2). Results The sample consisted of 55 individuals, 83.6% (n = 46) of whom were women. Per criteria 1, the sensitivities were 26.3 (right ear) and 21.4% (left ear). The specificity was 100% for both ears. Using criteria 2, the sensitivity was 94.7 (right ear) and 100% (left ear). The specificity was 74.3 (right ear) and 65.9% (left ear). Conclusion This study showed that the criteria proposed by the manufacturer presented low sensitivity in the hearing screening. The criteria proposed by the researchers to achieve a more efficient performance reached high and balanced values for sensitivity and specificity. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2013-11-07 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4296949/ /pubmed/25992058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1358660 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Cardoso, Carolina Louise Bós, Ângelo José Gonçalves Gonçalves, Andréa Krüger Olchik, Maira Rozenfeld Flores, Leticia Sousa Seimetz, Bruna Macagnin Bauer, Magda Aline Coradini, Patricia Pérez Teixeira, Adriane Ribeiro Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults |
title | Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults |
title_full | Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults |
title_short | Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults |
title_sort | sensitivity and specificity of portable hearing screening in middle-aged and older adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1358660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardosocarolinalouise sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT bosangelojosegoncalves sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT goncalvesandreakruger sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT olchikmairarozenfeld sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT floresleticiasousa sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT seimetzbrunamacagnin sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT bauermagdaaline sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT coradinipatriciaperez sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults AT teixeiraadrianeribeiro sensitivityandspecificityofportablehearingscreeninginmiddleagedandolderadults |