Cargando…

Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if the noninvasive or minimally invasive and nondestructive imaging techniques of quantitative T2-mapping or multiphoton microscopy (MPM) respectively, could detect differences in cartilage collagen orientation similar to polarized light microscopy (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Keir A., Williams, Rebecca M., Schnabel, Lauren V., Mohammed, Hussni O., Potter, Hollis G., Bradica, Gino, Castiglione, Emme, Pownder, Sarah L., Satchell, Patrick W., Saska, Ryan A., Fortier, Lisa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512461440
_version_ 1782353104160686080
author Ross, Keir A.
Williams, Rebecca M.
Schnabel, Lauren V.
Mohammed, Hussni O.
Potter, Hollis G.
Bradica, Gino
Castiglione, Emme
Pownder, Sarah L.
Satchell, Patrick W.
Saska, Ryan A.
Fortier, Lisa A.
author_facet Ross, Keir A.
Williams, Rebecca M.
Schnabel, Lauren V.
Mohammed, Hussni O.
Potter, Hollis G.
Bradica, Gino
Castiglione, Emme
Pownder, Sarah L.
Satchell, Patrick W.
Saska, Ryan A.
Fortier, Lisa A.
author_sort Ross, Keir A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if the noninvasive or minimally invasive and nondestructive imaging techniques of quantitative T2-mapping or multiphoton microscopy (MPM) respectively, could detect differences in cartilage collagen orientation similar to polarized light microscopy (PLM). It was hypothesized that MRI, MPM, and PLM would all detect quantitative differences between repair and normal cartilage tissue. METHODS: Osteochondral defects in the medial femoral condyle were created and repaired in 5 mature goats. Postmortem, MRI with T2-mapping and histology were performed. T2 maps were generated and a mean T2 value was calculated for each region of interest. Histologic slides were assessed using MPM with measurements of autocorrelation ellipticity, and by PLM with application of a validated scoring method. Collagen orientation using each of the 3 modalities (T2-mapping, MPM, and PLM) was measured in the center of the repair tissue and compared to remote, normal cartilage. RESULTS: MRI, MPM, and PLM were able to detect a significant difference between repair and normal cartilage (n = 5). The average T2 value was longer for repair tissue (41.43 ± 9.81 ms) compared with normal cartilage (27.12 ± 14.22 ms; P = 0.04); MPM autocorrelation ellipticity was higher in fibrous tissue (3.75 ± 1.17) compared with normal cartilage (2.24 ± 0.51; P = 0.01); the average PLM score for repair tissue was lower (1.6 ± 1.02) than the score for remote normal cartilage (4.4 ± 0.42; P = 0.002). The strongest correlation among the methods was between MRI and PLM (r = −0.76; P = 0.01), followed by MPM and PLM (r = −0.58; P = 0.08), with the weakest correlation shown between MRI and MPM (r = 0.35; P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: All 3 imaging methods quantitatively measured differences in collagen orientation between repair and normal cartilage, but at very different levels of resolution. PLM is destructive to tissue and requires euthanasia, but because MPM can be used arthroscopically, both T2-mapping and MPM can be performed in vivo, offering nondestructive means to assess collagen orientation that could be used to obtain longitudinal data in cartilage repair studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42971042015-06-11 Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation Ross, Keir A. Williams, Rebecca M. Schnabel, Lauren V. Mohammed, Hussni O. Potter, Hollis G. Bradica, Gino Castiglione, Emme Pownder, Sarah L. Satchell, Patrick W. Saska, Ryan A. Fortier, Lisa A. Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if the noninvasive or minimally invasive and nondestructive imaging techniques of quantitative T2-mapping or multiphoton microscopy (MPM) respectively, could detect differences in cartilage collagen orientation similar to polarized light microscopy (PLM). It was hypothesized that MRI, MPM, and PLM would all detect quantitative differences between repair and normal cartilage tissue. METHODS: Osteochondral defects in the medial femoral condyle were created and repaired in 5 mature goats. Postmortem, MRI with T2-mapping and histology were performed. T2 maps were generated and a mean T2 value was calculated for each region of interest. Histologic slides were assessed using MPM with measurements of autocorrelation ellipticity, and by PLM with application of a validated scoring method. Collagen orientation using each of the 3 modalities (T2-mapping, MPM, and PLM) was measured in the center of the repair tissue and compared to remote, normal cartilage. RESULTS: MRI, MPM, and PLM were able to detect a significant difference between repair and normal cartilage (n = 5). The average T2 value was longer for repair tissue (41.43 ± 9.81 ms) compared with normal cartilage (27.12 ± 14.22 ms; P = 0.04); MPM autocorrelation ellipticity was higher in fibrous tissue (3.75 ± 1.17) compared with normal cartilage (2.24 ± 0.51; P = 0.01); the average PLM score for repair tissue was lower (1.6 ± 1.02) than the score for remote normal cartilage (4.4 ± 0.42; P = 0.002). The strongest correlation among the methods was between MRI and PLM (r = −0.76; P = 0.01), followed by MPM and PLM (r = −0.58; P = 0.08), with the weakest correlation shown between MRI and MPM (r = 0.35; P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: All 3 imaging methods quantitatively measured differences in collagen orientation between repair and normal cartilage, but at very different levels of resolution. PLM is destructive to tissue and requires euthanasia, but because MPM can be used arthroscopically, both T2-mapping and MPM can be performed in vivo, offering nondestructive means to assess collagen orientation that could be used to obtain longitudinal data in cartilage repair studies. SAGE Publications 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4297104/ /pubmed/26069654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512461440 Text en © The Author(s) 2012
spellingShingle Article
Ross, Keir A.
Williams, Rebecca M.
Schnabel, Lauren V.
Mohammed, Hussni O.
Potter, Hollis G.
Bradica, Gino
Castiglione, Emme
Pownder, Sarah L.
Satchell, Patrick W.
Saska, Ryan A.
Fortier, Lisa A.
Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation
title Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation
title_full Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation
title_short Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Repair Cartilage Collagen Orientation
title_sort comparison of three methods to quantify repair cartilage collagen orientation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512461440
work_keys_str_mv AT rosskeira comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT williamsrebeccam comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT schnabellaurenv comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT mohammedhussnio comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT potterhollisg comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT bradicagino comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT castiglioneemme comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT powndersarahl comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT satchellpatrickw comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT saskaryana comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation
AT fortierlisaa comparisonofthreemethodstoquantifyrepaircartilagecollagenorientation