Cargando…

Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro

OBJECTIVE: Differences in contrast agent diffusion reflect changes in composition and structure of articular cartilage. However, in clinical application the contrast agent concentration in the joint capsule varies, which may affect the reliability of contrast enhanced cartilage tomography (CECT). In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvast, Tuomo S., Jurvelin, Jukka S., Tiitu, Virpi, Quinn, Thomas M., Töyräs, Juha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512451023
_version_ 1782353105089724416
author Silvast, Tuomo S.
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
Tiitu, Virpi
Quinn, Thomas M.
Töyräs, Juha
author_facet Silvast, Tuomo S.
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
Tiitu, Virpi
Quinn, Thomas M.
Töyräs, Juha
author_sort Silvast, Tuomo S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Differences in contrast agent diffusion reflect changes in composition and structure of articular cartilage. However, in clinical application the contrast agent concentration in the joint capsule varies, which may affect the reliability of contrast enhanced cartilage tomography (CECT). In the present study, effects of concentration of x-ray contrast agents on their diffusion and equilibrium distribution in cartilage were investigated. DESIGN: Full-thickness cartilage discs (d = 4.0 mm, n = 120) were detached from bovine patellae (n = 24). The diffusion of various concentrations of ioxaglate (5, 10, 21, 50 mM) and iodide (30, 60, 126, 300 mM) was allowed only through the articular surface. Samples were imaged with a clinical peripheral quantitative computed tomography scanner before immersion in contrast agent, and after 1, 5, 9, 16, 25, and 29 hours in the bath. RESULTS: Diffusion and partition coefficients were similar between different contrast agent concentrations. The diffusion coefficient of iodide (473 ± 133 µm(2)/s) was greater (P ≤ 0.001) than that of ioxaglate (92 ± 46 µm(2)/s). In full-thickness cartilage, the partition coefficient (at 29 h) of iodide (71 ± 5%) was greater (P ≤ 0.02 with most concentrations) than that of ioxaglate (62 ± 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in partition and diffusion coefficient of two similarly charged (−1) contrast agents were detected, which shows the effect of steric interactions. However, the increase in solute concentration did not increase its partition coefficient. In clinical application, it is important that contrast agent concentration does not affect the interpretation of CECT imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42971092015-06-11 Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro Silvast, Tuomo S. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Tiitu, Virpi Quinn, Thomas M. Töyräs, Juha Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: Differences in contrast agent diffusion reflect changes in composition and structure of articular cartilage. However, in clinical application the contrast agent concentration in the joint capsule varies, which may affect the reliability of contrast enhanced cartilage tomography (CECT). In the present study, effects of concentration of x-ray contrast agents on their diffusion and equilibrium distribution in cartilage were investigated. DESIGN: Full-thickness cartilage discs (d = 4.0 mm, n = 120) were detached from bovine patellae (n = 24). The diffusion of various concentrations of ioxaglate (5, 10, 21, 50 mM) and iodide (30, 60, 126, 300 mM) was allowed only through the articular surface. Samples were imaged with a clinical peripheral quantitative computed tomography scanner before immersion in contrast agent, and after 1, 5, 9, 16, 25, and 29 hours in the bath. RESULTS: Diffusion and partition coefficients were similar between different contrast agent concentrations. The diffusion coefficient of iodide (473 ± 133 µm(2)/s) was greater (P ≤ 0.001) than that of ioxaglate (92 ± 46 µm(2)/s). In full-thickness cartilage, the partition coefficient (at 29 h) of iodide (71 ± 5%) was greater (P ≤ 0.02 with most concentrations) than that of ioxaglate (62 ± 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in partition and diffusion coefficient of two similarly charged (−1) contrast agents were detected, which shows the effect of steric interactions. However, the increase in solute concentration did not increase its partition coefficient. In clinical application, it is important that contrast agent concentration does not affect the interpretation of CECT imaging. SAGE Publications 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4297109/ /pubmed/26069649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512451023 Text en © The Author(s) 2013
spellingShingle Article
Silvast, Tuomo S.
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
Tiitu, Virpi
Quinn, Thomas M.
Töyräs, Juha
Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
title Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
title_full Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
title_fullStr Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
title_short Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
title_sort bath concentration of anionic contrast agents does not affect their diffusion and distribution in articular cartilage in vitro
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512451023
work_keys_str_mv AT silvasttuomos bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro
AT jurvelinjukkas bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro
AT tiituvirpi bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro
AT quinnthomasm bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro
AT toyrasjuha bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro