Cargando…
Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro
OBJECTIVE: Differences in contrast agent diffusion reflect changes in composition and structure of articular cartilage. However, in clinical application the contrast agent concentration in the joint capsule varies, which may affect the reliability of contrast enhanced cartilage tomography (CECT). In...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512451023 |
_version_ | 1782353105089724416 |
---|---|
author | Silvast, Tuomo S. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Tiitu, Virpi Quinn, Thomas M. Töyräs, Juha |
author_facet | Silvast, Tuomo S. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Tiitu, Virpi Quinn, Thomas M. Töyräs, Juha |
author_sort | Silvast, Tuomo S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Differences in contrast agent diffusion reflect changes in composition and structure of articular cartilage. However, in clinical application the contrast agent concentration in the joint capsule varies, which may affect the reliability of contrast enhanced cartilage tomography (CECT). In the present study, effects of concentration of x-ray contrast agents on their diffusion and equilibrium distribution in cartilage were investigated. DESIGN: Full-thickness cartilage discs (d = 4.0 mm, n = 120) were detached from bovine patellae (n = 24). The diffusion of various concentrations of ioxaglate (5, 10, 21, 50 mM) and iodide (30, 60, 126, 300 mM) was allowed only through the articular surface. Samples were imaged with a clinical peripheral quantitative computed tomography scanner before immersion in contrast agent, and after 1, 5, 9, 16, 25, and 29 hours in the bath. RESULTS: Diffusion and partition coefficients were similar between different contrast agent concentrations. The diffusion coefficient of iodide (473 ± 133 µm(2)/s) was greater (P ≤ 0.001) than that of ioxaglate (92 ± 46 µm(2)/s). In full-thickness cartilage, the partition coefficient (at 29 h) of iodide (71 ± 5%) was greater (P ≤ 0.02 with most concentrations) than that of ioxaglate (62 ± 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in partition and diffusion coefficient of two similarly charged (−1) contrast agents were detected, which shows the effect of steric interactions. However, the increase in solute concentration did not increase its partition coefficient. In clinical application, it is important that contrast agent concentration does not affect the interpretation of CECT imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4297109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42971092015-06-11 Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro Silvast, Tuomo S. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Tiitu, Virpi Quinn, Thomas M. Töyräs, Juha Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: Differences in contrast agent diffusion reflect changes in composition and structure of articular cartilage. However, in clinical application the contrast agent concentration in the joint capsule varies, which may affect the reliability of contrast enhanced cartilage tomography (CECT). In the present study, effects of concentration of x-ray contrast agents on their diffusion and equilibrium distribution in cartilage were investigated. DESIGN: Full-thickness cartilage discs (d = 4.0 mm, n = 120) were detached from bovine patellae (n = 24). The diffusion of various concentrations of ioxaglate (5, 10, 21, 50 mM) and iodide (30, 60, 126, 300 mM) was allowed only through the articular surface. Samples were imaged with a clinical peripheral quantitative computed tomography scanner before immersion in contrast agent, and after 1, 5, 9, 16, 25, and 29 hours in the bath. RESULTS: Diffusion and partition coefficients were similar between different contrast agent concentrations. The diffusion coefficient of iodide (473 ± 133 µm(2)/s) was greater (P ≤ 0.001) than that of ioxaglate (92 ± 46 µm(2)/s). In full-thickness cartilage, the partition coefficient (at 29 h) of iodide (71 ± 5%) was greater (P ≤ 0.02 with most concentrations) than that of ioxaglate (62 ± 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in partition and diffusion coefficient of two similarly charged (−1) contrast agents were detected, which shows the effect of steric interactions. However, the increase in solute concentration did not increase its partition coefficient. In clinical application, it is important that contrast agent concentration does not affect the interpretation of CECT imaging. SAGE Publications 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4297109/ /pubmed/26069649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512451023 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 |
spellingShingle | Article Silvast, Tuomo S. Jurvelin, Jukka S. Tiitu, Virpi Quinn, Thomas M. Töyräs, Juha Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro |
title | Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro |
title_full | Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro |
title_fullStr | Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro |
title_full_unstemmed | Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro |
title_short | Bath Concentration of Anionic Contrast Agents Does Not Affect Their Diffusion and Distribution in Articular Cartilage In Vitro |
title_sort | bath concentration of anionic contrast agents does not affect their diffusion and distribution in articular cartilage in vitro |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512451023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvasttuomos bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro AT jurvelinjukkas bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro AT tiituvirpi bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro AT quinnthomasm bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro AT toyrasjuha bathconcentrationofanioniccontrastagentsdoesnotaffecttheirdiffusionanddistributioninarticularcartilageinvitro |