Cargando…

In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

OBJECTIVE: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) involves the application of a chondrocyte suspension into a membrane-sealed cartilage defect. Recently, “cell-seeded collagen matrix-supported” ACI has been developed wherein chondrocytes are seeded on a biomembrane. This study aimed at preclinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maréchal, Marina, Van Hauwermeiren, Hadewych, Neys, Johan, Vanderlinden, Gert, Van de Putte, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512457564
_version_ 1782353105322508288
author Maréchal, Marina
Van Hauwermeiren, Hadewych
Neys, Johan
Vanderlinden, Gert
Van de Putte, Tom
author_facet Maréchal, Marina
Van Hauwermeiren, Hadewych
Neys, Johan
Vanderlinden, Gert
Van de Putte, Tom
author_sort Maréchal, Marina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) involves the application of a chondrocyte suspension into a membrane-sealed cartilage defect. Recently, “cell-seeded collagen matrix-supported” ACI has been developed wherein chondrocytes are seeded on a biomembrane. This study aimed at preclinically comparing 4 variant ACI techniques in a refined goat model: 2 traditional procedures, whereby the defect is sealed by a periosteal flap or collagen membrane, and 2 cell-seeding methods, with the collagen membrane either sutured or glued into the defect. DESIGN: The efficacy of the surgical techniques was evaluated in an acute critical size chondral defect in the medial condyle of 32 skeletally mature goats, randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 aforementioned treatment groups. After 10 weeks in vivo, the quality of the repair was graded histologically by 2 independent, blinded readers using the “modified O’Driscoll” score. RESULTS: The cell-seeding procedure whereby the membrane is sutured into the defect has a similar structural repair capacity than traditional ACI techniques. However, when the cell-seeded membrane was glued into the defect, the outcome appeared inferior. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that optimizing the goat model and the postoperative recovery does allow preclinical evaluation of ACI-based cartilage implants in a load-bearing setting. This preclinical observation provides support to the clinical utilization of the sutured membrane-seeded (ACI-CS) technique, provided sutures, but not fibrin sealants, are used to fix the cell-seeded membrane in the defect bed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42971102015-06-11 In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Maréchal, Marina Van Hauwermeiren, Hadewych Neys, Johan Vanderlinden, Gert Van de Putte, Tom Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) involves the application of a chondrocyte suspension into a membrane-sealed cartilage defect. Recently, “cell-seeded collagen matrix-supported” ACI has been developed wherein chondrocytes are seeded on a biomembrane. This study aimed at preclinically comparing 4 variant ACI techniques in a refined goat model: 2 traditional procedures, whereby the defect is sealed by a periosteal flap or collagen membrane, and 2 cell-seeding methods, with the collagen membrane either sutured or glued into the defect. DESIGN: The efficacy of the surgical techniques was evaluated in an acute critical size chondral defect in the medial condyle of 32 skeletally mature goats, randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 aforementioned treatment groups. After 10 weeks in vivo, the quality of the repair was graded histologically by 2 independent, blinded readers using the “modified O’Driscoll” score. RESULTS: The cell-seeding procedure whereby the membrane is sutured into the defect has a similar structural repair capacity than traditional ACI techniques. However, when the cell-seeded membrane was glued into the defect, the outcome appeared inferior. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that optimizing the goat model and the postoperative recovery does allow preclinical evaluation of ACI-based cartilage implants in a load-bearing setting. This preclinical observation provides support to the clinical utilization of the sutured membrane-seeded (ACI-CS) technique, provided sutures, but not fibrin sealants, are used to fix the cell-seeded membrane in the defect bed. SAGE Publications 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4297110/ /pubmed/26069652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512457564 Text en © The Author(s) 2013
spellingShingle Article
Maréchal, Marina
Van Hauwermeiren, Hadewych
Neys, Johan
Vanderlinden, Gert
Van de Putte, Tom
In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
title In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
title_full In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
title_fullStr In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
title_short In Vivo Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
title_sort in vivo evaluation of different surgical procedures for autologous chondrocyte implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512457564
work_keys_str_mv AT marechalmarina invivoevaluationofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforautologouschondrocyteimplantation
AT vanhauwermeirenhadewych invivoevaluationofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforautologouschondrocyteimplantation
AT neysjohan invivoevaluationofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforautologouschondrocyteimplantation
AT vanderlindengert invivoevaluationofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforautologouschondrocyteimplantation
AT vandeputtetom invivoevaluationofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforautologouschondrocyteimplantation