Cargando…

Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies

In the United States, few Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved options exist for the treatment of focal cartilage and osteochondral lesions. Developers of products for cartilage repair face many challenges to obtain marketing approval from the FDA. The objective of this review is to discuss t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGowan, Kevin B., Stiegman, Glenn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512460756
_version_ 1782353105566826496
author McGowan, Kevin B.
Stiegman, Glenn
author_facet McGowan, Kevin B.
Stiegman, Glenn
author_sort McGowan, Kevin B.
collection PubMed
description In the United States, few Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved options exist for the treatment of focal cartilage and osteochondral lesions. Developers of products for cartilage repair face many challenges to obtain marketing approval from the FDA. The objective of this review is to discuss the necessary steps for FDA application and approval for a new cartilage repair product. FDA Guidance Documents, FDA Panel Meetings, scientific organization recommendations, and clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed to demonstrate the current thinking of FDA and the scientific community on the regulatory process for cartilage repair therapies. Cartilage repair therapies can receive market approval from FDA as medical devices, drugs, or biologics, and the specific classification of product can affect the nonclinical, clinical, and regulatory strategy to bring the product to market. Recent FDA guidance gives an outline of the required elements to bring a cartilage repair product to market, although these standards are often very general. As a result, companies have to carefully craft their study patient population, comparator group, and clinical endpoint to best showcase their product’s attributes. In addition, regulatory strategy and manufacturing process validation need to be considered early in the clinical study process to allow for timely product approval following the completion of clinical study. Although the path to regulatory approval for a cartilage repair therapy is challenging and time-consuming, proper clinical trial planning and attention to the details can eventually save companies time and money by bringing a product to the market in the most expeditious process possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42971112015-06-11 Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies McGowan, Kevin B. Stiegman, Glenn Cartilage Article In the United States, few Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved options exist for the treatment of focal cartilage and osteochondral lesions. Developers of products for cartilage repair face many challenges to obtain marketing approval from the FDA. The objective of this review is to discuss the necessary steps for FDA application and approval for a new cartilage repair product. FDA Guidance Documents, FDA Panel Meetings, scientific organization recommendations, and clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed to demonstrate the current thinking of FDA and the scientific community on the regulatory process for cartilage repair therapies. Cartilage repair therapies can receive market approval from FDA as medical devices, drugs, or biologics, and the specific classification of product can affect the nonclinical, clinical, and regulatory strategy to bring the product to market. Recent FDA guidance gives an outline of the required elements to bring a cartilage repair product to market, although these standards are often very general. As a result, companies have to carefully craft their study patient population, comparator group, and clinical endpoint to best showcase their product’s attributes. In addition, regulatory strategy and manufacturing process validation need to be considered early in the clinical study process to allow for timely product approval following the completion of clinical study. Although the path to regulatory approval for a cartilage repair therapy is challenging and time-consuming, proper clinical trial planning and attention to the details can eventually save companies time and money by bringing a product to the market in the most expeditious process possible. SAGE Publications 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4297111/ /pubmed/26069647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512460756 Text en © The Author(s) 2013
spellingShingle Article
McGowan, Kevin B.
Stiegman, Glenn
Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies
title Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies
title_full Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies
title_fullStr Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies
title_short Regulatory Challenges for Cartilage Repair Technologies
title_sort regulatory challenges for cartilage repair technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603512460756
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgowankevinb regulatorychallengesforcartilagerepairtechnologies
AT stiegmanglenn regulatorychallengesforcartilagerepairtechnologies