Cargando…
Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514529587 |
_version_ | 1782353120406274048 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Charles P. Surowiec, Rachel K. Ferro, Fernando P. Lucas, Erin P. Saroki, Adriana J. Dornan, Grant J. Fitzcharles, Eric K. Anz, Adam W. Smith, W. Sean Wilson, Katharine J. Philippon, Marc J. |
author_facet | Ho, Charles P. Surowiec, Rachel K. Ferro, Fernando P. Lucas, Erin P. Saroki, Adriana J. Dornan, Grant J. Fitzcharles, Eric K. Anz, Adam W. Smith, W. Sean Wilson, Katharine J. Philippon, Marc J. |
author_sort | Ho, Charles P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of hip cartilage damage using T2 mapping to determine the normative T2 values in asymptomatic individuals. DESIGN: Nineteen prospectively enrolled asymptomatic volunteers (age 18-35 years, males 10, females 9, alpha angle 49.3º ± 7.2º) were evaluated with a sagittal T2 mapping sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acetabular and femoral cartilage was manually segmented directly on the second echo of the T2 mapping sequence by 3 raters, twice. Segmentations were divided into 12 subregions modified from the geographic zone method. Median T2 values within each subregion were compiled for further analysis and interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed. RESULTS: In the femur, the posterior-superior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than those in the posterior-inferior and anterior-inferior subregions. In the acetabulum, the anterior-inferior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001) than in the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. T2 values of the posterior-superior subregion were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. Interrater agreement was generally fair to good. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4297181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42971812015-07-01 Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips Ho, Charles P. Surowiec, Rachel K. Ferro, Fernando P. Lucas, Erin P. Saroki, Adriana J. Dornan, Grant J. Fitzcharles, Eric K. Anz, Adam W. Smith, W. Sean Wilson, Katharine J. Philippon, Marc J. Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of hip cartilage damage using T2 mapping to determine the normative T2 values in asymptomatic individuals. DESIGN: Nineteen prospectively enrolled asymptomatic volunteers (age 18-35 years, males 10, females 9, alpha angle 49.3º ± 7.2º) were evaluated with a sagittal T2 mapping sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acetabular and femoral cartilage was manually segmented directly on the second echo of the T2 mapping sequence by 3 raters, twice. Segmentations were divided into 12 subregions modified from the geographic zone method. Median T2 values within each subregion were compiled for further analysis and interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed. RESULTS: In the femur, the posterior-superior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than those in the posterior-inferior and anterior-inferior subregions. In the acetabulum, the anterior-inferior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001) than in the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. T2 values of the posterior-superior subregion were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. Interrater agreement was generally fair to good. SAGE Publications 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4297181/ /pubmed/26069695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514529587 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 |
spellingShingle | Article Ho, Charles P. Surowiec, Rachel K. Ferro, Fernando P. Lucas, Erin P. Saroki, Adriana J. Dornan, Grant J. Fitzcharles, Eric K. Anz, Adam W. Smith, W. Sean Wilson, Katharine J. Philippon, Marc J. Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips |
title | Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips |
title_full | Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips |
title_fullStr | Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips |
title_full_unstemmed | Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips |
title_short | Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips |
title_sort | subregional anatomical distribution of t2 values of articular cartilage in asymptomatic hips |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514529587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hocharlesp subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT surowiecrachelk subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT ferrofernandop subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT lucaserinp subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT sarokiadrianaj subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT dornangrantj subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT fitzcharleserick subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT anzadamw subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT smithwsean subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT wilsonkatharinej subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips AT philipponmarcj subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips |