Cargando…

Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips

OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Charles P., Surowiec, Rachel K., Ferro, Fernando P., Lucas, Erin P., Saroki, Adriana J., Dornan, Grant J., Fitzcharles, Eric K., Anz, Adam W., Smith, W. Sean, Wilson, Katharine J., Philippon, Marc J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514529587
_version_ 1782353120406274048
author Ho, Charles P.
Surowiec, Rachel K.
Ferro, Fernando P.
Lucas, Erin P.
Saroki, Adriana J.
Dornan, Grant J.
Fitzcharles, Eric K.
Anz, Adam W.
Smith, W. Sean
Wilson, Katharine J.
Philippon, Marc J.
author_facet Ho, Charles P.
Surowiec, Rachel K.
Ferro, Fernando P.
Lucas, Erin P.
Saroki, Adriana J.
Dornan, Grant J.
Fitzcharles, Eric K.
Anz, Adam W.
Smith, W. Sean
Wilson, Katharine J.
Philippon, Marc J.
author_sort Ho, Charles P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of hip cartilage damage using T2 mapping to determine the normative T2 values in asymptomatic individuals. DESIGN: Nineteen prospectively enrolled asymptomatic volunteers (age 18-35 years, males 10, females 9, alpha angle 49.3º ± 7.2º) were evaluated with a sagittal T2 mapping sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acetabular and femoral cartilage was manually segmented directly on the second echo of the T2 mapping sequence by 3 raters, twice. Segmentations were divided into 12 subregions modified from the geographic zone method. Median T2 values within each subregion were compiled for further analysis and interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed. RESULTS: In the femur, the posterior-superior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than those in the posterior-inferior and anterior-inferior subregions. In the acetabulum, the anterior-inferior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001) than in the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. T2 values of the posterior-superior subregion were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. Interrater agreement was generally fair to good.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42971812015-07-01 Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips Ho, Charles P. Surowiec, Rachel K. Ferro, Fernando P. Lucas, Erin P. Saroki, Adriana J. Dornan, Grant J. Fitzcharles, Eric K. Anz, Adam W. Smith, W. Sean Wilson, Katharine J. Philippon, Marc J. Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition of normative T2 values across the articular surface of the hip must be defined in order to fully understand T2 values for detecting early degeneration. Therefore, in this article, we seek to lay foundational methodology for reproducible quantitative evaluation of hip cartilage damage using T2 mapping to determine the normative T2 values in asymptomatic individuals. DESIGN: Nineteen prospectively enrolled asymptomatic volunteers (age 18-35 years, males 10, females 9, alpha angle 49.3º ± 7.2º) were evaluated with a sagittal T2 mapping sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acetabular and femoral cartilage was manually segmented directly on the second echo of the T2 mapping sequence by 3 raters, twice. Segmentations were divided into 12 subregions modified from the geographic zone method. Median T2 values within each subregion were compiled for further analysis and interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed. RESULTS: In the femur, the posterior-superior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than those in the posterior-inferior and anterior-inferior subregions. In the acetabulum, the anterior-inferior subregion was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001) than in the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. T2 values of the posterior-superior subregion were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) than the anterior-superior, middle, and posterior-inferior subregions. Interrater agreement was generally fair to good. SAGE Publications 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4297181/ /pubmed/26069695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514529587 Text en © The Author(s) 2014
spellingShingle Article
Ho, Charles P.
Surowiec, Rachel K.
Ferro, Fernando P.
Lucas, Erin P.
Saroki, Adriana J.
Dornan, Grant J.
Fitzcharles, Eric K.
Anz, Adam W.
Smith, W. Sean
Wilson, Katharine J.
Philippon, Marc J.
Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
title Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
title_full Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
title_fullStr Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
title_full_unstemmed Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
title_short Subregional Anatomical Distribution of T2 Values of Articular Cartilage in Asymptomatic Hips
title_sort subregional anatomical distribution of t2 values of articular cartilage in asymptomatic hips
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514529587
work_keys_str_mv AT hocharlesp subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT surowiecrachelk subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT ferrofernandop subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT lucaserinp subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT sarokiadrianaj subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT dornangrantj subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT fitzcharleserick subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT anzadamw subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT smithwsean subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT wilsonkatharinej subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips
AT philipponmarcj subregionalanatomicaldistributionoft2valuesofarticularcartilageinasymptomatichips