Cargando…

Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies

Previous studies have suggested that processing categorical spatial relations requires high spatial frequency (HSF) information, while coordinate spatial relations require low spatial frequency (LSF) information. The aim of the present study was to determine whether spatial frequency influences cate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saneyoshi, Ayako, Michimata, Chikashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25236965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0635-z
_version_ 1782353130687561728
author Saneyoshi, Ayako
Michimata, Chikashi
author_facet Saneyoshi, Ayako
Michimata, Chikashi
author_sort Saneyoshi, Ayako
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have suggested that processing categorical spatial relations requires high spatial frequency (HSF) information, while coordinate spatial relations require low spatial frequency (LSF) information. The aim of the present study was to determine whether spatial frequency influences categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition. Participants performed two object-matching tasks for novel, non-nameable objects consisting of “geons” (c.f. Brain Cogn 71:181–186, 2009). For each original stimulus, categorical and coordinate transformations were applied to create comparison stimuli. These stimuli were high-pass/low-cut-filtered or low-pass/high-cut-filtered by a filter with a 2D Gaussian envelope. The categorical task consisted of the original and categorical-transformed objects. The coordinate task consisted of the original and coordinate-transformed objects. The non-filtered object image was presented on a CRT monitor, followed by a comparison object (non-filtered, high-pass-filtered, and low-pass-filtered stimuli). The results showed that the removal of HSF information from the object image produced longer reaction times (RTs) in the categorical task, while removal of LSF information produced longer RTs in the coordinate task. These results support spatial frequency processing theory, specifically Kosslyn’s hypothesis and the double filtering frequency model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42973032015-01-21 Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies Saneyoshi, Ayako Michimata, Chikashi Cogn Process Research Report Previous studies have suggested that processing categorical spatial relations requires high spatial frequency (HSF) information, while coordinate spatial relations require low spatial frequency (LSF) information. The aim of the present study was to determine whether spatial frequency influences categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition. Participants performed two object-matching tasks for novel, non-nameable objects consisting of “geons” (c.f. Brain Cogn 71:181–186, 2009). For each original stimulus, categorical and coordinate transformations were applied to create comparison stimuli. These stimuli were high-pass/low-cut-filtered or low-pass/high-cut-filtered by a filter with a 2D Gaussian envelope. The categorical task consisted of the original and categorical-transformed objects. The coordinate task consisted of the original and coordinate-transformed objects. The non-filtered object image was presented on a CRT monitor, followed by a comparison object (non-filtered, high-pass-filtered, and low-pass-filtered stimuli). The results showed that the removal of HSF information from the object image produced longer reaction times (RTs) in the categorical task, while removal of LSF information produced longer RTs in the coordinate task. These results support spatial frequency processing theory, specifically Kosslyn’s hypothesis and the double filtering frequency model. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-09-19 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4297303/ /pubmed/25236965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0635-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Report
Saneyoshi, Ayako
Michimata, Chikashi
Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
title Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
title_full Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
title_fullStr Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
title_full_unstemmed Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
title_short Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
title_sort categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25236965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0635-z
work_keys_str_mv AT saneyoshiayako categoricalandcoordinateprocessinginobjectrecognitiondependsondifferentspatialfrequencies
AT michimatachikashi categoricalandcoordinateprocessinginobjectrecognitiondependsondifferentspatialfrequencies