Cargando…
Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock
INTRODUCTION: Intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) is useful for proximal vascular control, by clamping the descending aorta, in traumatic haemorrhagic shock. However, there are limited clinical studies regarding its effectiveness. This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of IABO for tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-10-1 |
_version_ | 1782353146538885120 |
---|---|
author | Irahara, Takayuki Sato, Norio Moroe, Yuuta Fukuda, Reo Iwai, Yusuke Unemoto, Kyoko |
author_facet | Irahara, Takayuki Sato, Norio Moroe, Yuuta Fukuda, Reo Iwai, Yusuke Unemoto, Kyoko |
author_sort | Irahara, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) is useful for proximal vascular control, by clamping the descending aorta, in traumatic haemorrhagic shock. However, there are limited clinical studies regarding its effectiveness. This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of IABO for traumatic haemorrhagic shock. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included trauma patients who underwent IABO at the Emergency and Critical Care Center of Nippon Medical School Tama-Nagayama Hospital between January 2009 and March 2013. 14 patients were included to this study who were in shock on arrival (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90 mmHg or shock index ≥1), underwent IABO for resuscitation and temporary haemostasis, and subsequently underwent haemostatic intervention (operation or transcatheter arterial embolization). Patient characteristics, physiological status, SBP, heart rate (HR), initial fluid and blood transfusion, time course, and total occlusion time were compared before and after IABO as well as between the survived (n = 5) and non-survived (n = 9) groups. RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced blunt injuries, with an average injury severity score of 29.5. The liver, pelvis, spleen, and mesenterium represented the majority of injured organs. SBP, but not HR, was significantly higher after IABO than before IABO (123.1 vs. 65.5 mmHg, P = 0.0001). The revised trauma score and probability of survival were significantly different between the survived and non-survived groups (both, P = 0.04). The survived group required significantly less blood transfusion volume than the non-survived group (20 vs. 33.7 red blood cell units, P = 0.04). In addition, the survived group required a significantly shorter total occlusion time than the non-survived group (46.2 vs. 224.1 min, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IABO was used for relatively severe trauma patients. SBP was significantly higher after IABO, but was not related to survival. However, blood transfusion volume and total occlusion time were related to survival; therefore, it is important to reduce or shorten these parameters, i.e., immediate definitive haemostasis. IABO is effective for traumatic haemorrhagic shock; however, it is also important to consider these points and potential complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4297416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42974162015-01-18 Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock Irahara, Takayuki Sato, Norio Moroe, Yuuta Fukuda, Reo Iwai, Yusuke Unemoto, Kyoko World J Emerg Surg Research Article INTRODUCTION: Intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) is useful for proximal vascular control, by clamping the descending aorta, in traumatic haemorrhagic shock. However, there are limited clinical studies regarding its effectiveness. This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of IABO for traumatic haemorrhagic shock. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included trauma patients who underwent IABO at the Emergency and Critical Care Center of Nippon Medical School Tama-Nagayama Hospital between January 2009 and March 2013. 14 patients were included to this study who were in shock on arrival (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90 mmHg or shock index ≥1), underwent IABO for resuscitation and temporary haemostasis, and subsequently underwent haemostatic intervention (operation or transcatheter arterial embolization). Patient characteristics, physiological status, SBP, heart rate (HR), initial fluid and blood transfusion, time course, and total occlusion time were compared before and after IABO as well as between the survived (n = 5) and non-survived (n = 9) groups. RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced blunt injuries, with an average injury severity score of 29.5. The liver, pelvis, spleen, and mesenterium represented the majority of injured organs. SBP, but not HR, was significantly higher after IABO than before IABO (123.1 vs. 65.5 mmHg, P = 0.0001). The revised trauma score and probability of survival were significantly different between the survived and non-survived groups (both, P = 0.04). The survived group required significantly less blood transfusion volume than the non-survived group (20 vs. 33.7 red blood cell units, P = 0.04). In addition, the survived group required a significantly shorter total occlusion time than the non-survived group (46.2 vs. 224.1 min, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IABO was used for relatively severe trauma patients. SBP was significantly higher after IABO, but was not related to survival. However, blood transfusion volume and total occlusion time were related to survival; therefore, it is important to reduce or shorten these parameters, i.e., immediate definitive haemostasis. IABO is effective for traumatic haemorrhagic shock; however, it is also important to consider these points and potential complications. BioMed Central 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4297416/ /pubmed/25598838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-10-1 Text en © Irahara et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Irahara, Takayuki Sato, Norio Moroe, Yuuta Fukuda, Reo Iwai, Yusuke Unemoto, Kyoko Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
title | Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
title_full | Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
title_fullStr | Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
title_short | Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
title_sort | retrospective study of the effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon occlusion (iabo) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-10-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iraharatakayuki retrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessofintraaorticballoonocclusioniabofortraumatichaemorrhagicshock AT satonorio retrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessofintraaorticballoonocclusioniabofortraumatichaemorrhagicshock AT moroeyuuta retrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessofintraaorticballoonocclusioniabofortraumatichaemorrhagicshock AT fukudareo retrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessofintraaorticballoonocclusioniabofortraumatichaemorrhagicshock AT iwaiyusuke retrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessofintraaorticballoonocclusioniabofortraumatichaemorrhagicshock AT unemotokyoko retrospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessofintraaorticballoonocclusioniabofortraumatichaemorrhagicshock |