Cargando…

Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning

We aim to determine if machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines (SVMs), can predict the occurrence of a second clinical attack, which leads to the diagnosis of clinically-definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), on the basis of sin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wottschel, V., Alexander, D.C., Kwok, P.P., Chard, D.T., Stromillo, M.L., De Stefano, N., Thompson, A.J., Miller, D.H., Ciccarelli, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.021
_version_ 1782353188227121152
author Wottschel, V.
Alexander, D.C.
Kwok, P.P.
Chard, D.T.
Stromillo, M.L.
De Stefano, N.
Thompson, A.J.
Miller, D.H.
Ciccarelli, O.
author_facet Wottschel, V.
Alexander, D.C.
Kwok, P.P.
Chard, D.T.
Stromillo, M.L.
De Stefano, N.
Thompson, A.J.
Miller, D.H.
Ciccarelli, O.
author_sort Wottschel, V.
collection PubMed
description We aim to determine if machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines (SVMs), can predict the occurrence of a second clinical attack, which leads to the diagnosis of clinically-definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), on the basis of single patient's lesion features and clinical/demographic characteristics. Seventy-four patients at onset of CIS were scanned and clinically reviewed after one and three years. CDMS was used as the gold standard against which SVM classification accuracy was tested. Radiological features related to lesional characteristics on conventional MRI were defined a priori and used in combination with clinical/demographic features in an SVM. Forward recursive feature elimination with 100 bootstraps and a leave-one-out cross-validation was used to find the most predictive feature combinations. 30 % and 44 % of patients developed CDMS within one and three years, respectively. The SVMs correctly predicted the presence (or the absence) of CDMS in 71.4 % of patients (sensitivity/specificity: 77 %/66 %) at 1 year, and in 68 % (60 %/76 %) at 3 years on average over all bootstraps. Combinations of features consistently gave a higher accuracy in predicting outcome than any single feature. Machine-learning-based classifications can be used to provide an “individualised” prediction of conversion to MS from subjects' baseline scans and clinical characteristics, with potential to be incorporated into routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4297887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42978872015-01-21 Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning Wottschel, V. Alexander, D.C. Kwok, P.P. Chard, D.T. Stromillo, M.L. De Stefano, N. Thompson, A.J. Miller, D.H. Ciccarelli, O. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article We aim to determine if machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines (SVMs), can predict the occurrence of a second clinical attack, which leads to the diagnosis of clinically-definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), on the basis of single patient's lesion features and clinical/demographic characteristics. Seventy-four patients at onset of CIS were scanned and clinically reviewed after one and three years. CDMS was used as the gold standard against which SVM classification accuracy was tested. Radiological features related to lesional characteristics on conventional MRI were defined a priori and used in combination with clinical/demographic features in an SVM. Forward recursive feature elimination with 100 bootstraps and a leave-one-out cross-validation was used to find the most predictive feature combinations. 30 % and 44 % of patients developed CDMS within one and three years, respectively. The SVMs correctly predicted the presence (or the absence) of CDMS in 71.4 % of patients (sensitivity/specificity: 77 %/66 %) at 1 year, and in 68 % (60 %/76 %) at 3 years on average over all bootstraps. Combinations of features consistently gave a higher accuracy in predicting outcome than any single feature. Machine-learning-based classifications can be used to provide an “individualised” prediction of conversion to MS from subjects' baseline scans and clinical characteristics, with potential to be incorporated into routine clinical practice. Elsevier 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4297887/ /pubmed/25610791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.021 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Wottschel, V.
Alexander, D.C.
Kwok, P.P.
Chard, D.T.
Stromillo, M.L.
De Stefano, N.
Thompson, A.J.
Miller, D.H.
Ciccarelli, O.
Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
title Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
title_full Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
title_short Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
title_sort predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.021
work_keys_str_mv AT wottschelv predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT alexanderdc predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT kwokpp predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT charddt predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT stromilloml predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT destefanon predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT thompsonaj predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT millerdh predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning
AT ciccarellio predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning