Cargando…
Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning
We aim to determine if machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines (SVMs), can predict the occurrence of a second clinical attack, which leads to the diagnosis of clinically-definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), on the basis of sin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.021 |
_version_ | 1782353188227121152 |
---|---|
author | Wottschel, V. Alexander, D.C. Kwok, P.P. Chard, D.T. Stromillo, M.L. De Stefano, N. Thompson, A.J. Miller, D.H. Ciccarelli, O. |
author_facet | Wottschel, V. Alexander, D.C. Kwok, P.P. Chard, D.T. Stromillo, M.L. De Stefano, N. Thompson, A.J. Miller, D.H. Ciccarelli, O. |
author_sort | Wottschel, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aim to determine if machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines (SVMs), can predict the occurrence of a second clinical attack, which leads to the diagnosis of clinically-definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), on the basis of single patient's lesion features and clinical/demographic characteristics. Seventy-four patients at onset of CIS were scanned and clinically reviewed after one and three years. CDMS was used as the gold standard against which SVM classification accuracy was tested. Radiological features related to lesional characteristics on conventional MRI were defined a priori and used in combination with clinical/demographic features in an SVM. Forward recursive feature elimination with 100 bootstraps and a leave-one-out cross-validation was used to find the most predictive feature combinations. 30 % and 44 % of patients developed CDMS within one and three years, respectively. The SVMs correctly predicted the presence (or the absence) of CDMS in 71.4 % of patients (sensitivity/specificity: 77 %/66 %) at 1 year, and in 68 % (60 %/76 %) at 3 years on average over all bootstraps. Combinations of features consistently gave a higher accuracy in predicting outcome than any single feature. Machine-learning-based classifications can be used to provide an “individualised” prediction of conversion to MS from subjects' baseline scans and clinical characteristics, with potential to be incorporated into routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4297887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42978872015-01-21 Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning Wottschel, V. Alexander, D.C. Kwok, P.P. Chard, D.T. Stromillo, M.L. De Stefano, N. Thompson, A.J. Miller, D.H. Ciccarelli, O. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article We aim to determine if machine learning techniques, such as support vector machines (SVMs), can predict the occurrence of a second clinical attack, which leads to the diagnosis of clinically-definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), on the basis of single patient's lesion features and clinical/demographic characteristics. Seventy-four patients at onset of CIS were scanned and clinically reviewed after one and three years. CDMS was used as the gold standard against which SVM classification accuracy was tested. Radiological features related to lesional characteristics on conventional MRI were defined a priori and used in combination with clinical/demographic features in an SVM. Forward recursive feature elimination with 100 bootstraps and a leave-one-out cross-validation was used to find the most predictive feature combinations. 30 % and 44 % of patients developed CDMS within one and three years, respectively. The SVMs correctly predicted the presence (or the absence) of CDMS in 71.4 % of patients (sensitivity/specificity: 77 %/66 %) at 1 year, and in 68 % (60 %/76 %) at 3 years on average over all bootstraps. Combinations of features consistently gave a higher accuracy in predicting outcome than any single feature. Machine-learning-based classifications can be used to provide an “individualised” prediction of conversion to MS from subjects' baseline scans and clinical characteristics, with potential to be incorporated into routine clinical practice. Elsevier 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4297887/ /pubmed/25610791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.021 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Wottschel, V. Alexander, D.C. Kwok, P.P. Chard, D.T. Stromillo, M.L. De Stefano, N. Thompson, A.J. Miller, D.H. Ciccarelli, O. Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
title | Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
title_full | Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
title_short | Predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
title_sort | predicting outcome in clinically isolated syndrome using machine learning |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wottschelv predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT alexanderdc predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT kwokpp predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT charddt predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT stromilloml predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT destefanon predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT thompsonaj predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT millerdh predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning AT ciccarellio predictingoutcomeinclinicallyisolatedsyndromeusingmachinelearning |