Cargando…

Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries

BACKGROUND: The Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI), the measure underlying the European indicator Healthy Life Years (HLY), is widely used to compare population health across countries. However, the comparability of the item has been questioned. This study aims to further validate the GALI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berger, Nicolas, Van Oyen, Herman, Cambois, Emmanuelle, Fouweather, Tony, Jagger, Carol, Nusselder, Wilma, Robine, Jean-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25555466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-15-1
_version_ 1782353214282137600
author Berger, Nicolas
Van Oyen, Herman
Cambois, Emmanuelle
Fouweather, Tony
Jagger, Carol
Nusselder, Wilma
Robine, Jean-Marie
author_facet Berger, Nicolas
Van Oyen, Herman
Cambois, Emmanuelle
Fouweather, Tony
Jagger, Carol
Nusselder, Wilma
Robine, Jean-Marie
author_sort Berger, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI), the measure underlying the European indicator Healthy Life Years (HLY), is widely used to compare population health across countries. However, the comparability of the item has been questioned. This study aims to further validate the GALI in the adult European population. METHODS: Data from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), covering 14 European countries and 152,787 individuals, were used to explore how the GALI was associated with other measures of disability and whether the GALI was consistent or reflected different disability situations in different countries. RESULTS: When considering each country separately or all combined, we found that the GALI was significantly associated with measures of activities of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living, and functional limitations (P < 0.001 in all cases). Associations were largest for activity of daily living and lowest though still high for functional limitations. For each measure, the magnitude of the association was similar across most countries. Overall, however, the GALI differed significantly between countries in terms of how it reflected each of the three disability measures (P < 0.001 in all cases). We suspect cross-country differences in the results may be due to variations in: the implementation of the EHIS, the perception of functioning and limitations, and the understanding of the GALI question. CONCLUSION: The study both confirms the relevance of this indicator to measure general activity limitations in the European population and the need for caution when comparing the level of the GALI from one country to another. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-15-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4298058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42980582015-01-20 Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries Berger, Nicolas Van Oyen, Herman Cambois, Emmanuelle Fouweather, Tony Jagger, Carol Nusselder, Wilma Robine, Jean-Marie BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI), the measure underlying the European indicator Healthy Life Years (HLY), is widely used to compare population health across countries. However, the comparability of the item has been questioned. This study aims to further validate the GALI in the adult European population. METHODS: Data from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), covering 14 European countries and 152,787 individuals, were used to explore how the GALI was associated with other measures of disability and whether the GALI was consistent or reflected different disability situations in different countries. RESULTS: When considering each country separately or all combined, we found that the GALI was significantly associated with measures of activities of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living, and functional limitations (P < 0.001 in all cases). Associations were largest for activity of daily living and lowest though still high for functional limitations. For each measure, the magnitude of the association was similar across most countries. Overall, however, the GALI differed significantly between countries in terms of how it reflected each of the three disability measures (P < 0.001 in all cases). We suspect cross-country differences in the results may be due to variations in: the implementation of the EHIS, the perception of functioning and limitations, and the understanding of the GALI question. CONCLUSION: The study both confirms the relevance of this indicator to measure general activity limitations in the European population and the need for caution when comparing the level of the GALI from one country to another. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-15-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4298058/ /pubmed/25555466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-15-1 Text en © Berger et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Berger, Nicolas
Van Oyen, Herman
Cambois, Emmanuelle
Fouweather, Tony
Jagger, Carol
Nusselder, Wilma
Robine, Jean-Marie
Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries
title Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries
title_full Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries
title_fullStr Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries
title_short Assessing the validity of the Global Activity Limitation Indicator in fourteen European countries
title_sort assessing the validity of the global activity limitation indicator in fourteen european countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25555466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-15-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bergernicolas assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries
AT vanoyenherman assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries
AT camboisemmanuelle assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries
AT fouweathertony assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries
AT jaggercarol assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries
AT nusselderwilma assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries
AT robinejeanmarie assessingthevalidityoftheglobalactivitylimitationindicatorinfourteeneuropeancountries