Cargando…

Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients. METHODS: A total of 74 adult patients were as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komasawa, Nobuyasu, Nishihara, Isao, Tatsumi, Shinichi, Minami, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653
_version_ 1782353221559255040
author Komasawa, Nobuyasu
Nishihara, Isao
Tatsumi, Shinichi
Minami, Toshiaki
author_facet Komasawa, Nobuyasu
Nishihara, Isao
Tatsumi, Shinichi
Minami, Toshiaki
author_sort Komasawa, Nobuyasu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients. METHODS: A total of 74 adult patients were assigned to the warm (i-gel prewarmed to 42°C; W group; 37 patients) or the control (i-gel kept at room temperature; C group; 37 patients) groups. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. The i-gel was prewarmed to 42°C for 30 min before insertion in the W group, but kept at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for the C group. The number of attempts made until successful insertion and sealing pressure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Insertion was successful with one attempt in 35 cases each for the W and C groups. Two attempts were needed in two cases for the W group and one case for the C group. There was one failed attempt in the C group, but none in the W group. None of the differences between the two groups were significant (p=0.51). Sealing pressure was slightly, but not significantly, higher in the W group than in the C group (W group 22.6±6.1 cm H(2)O; C group 20.7±6.1 cm H(2)O; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Prewarming of the i-gel to 42°C did not increase the success rate of insertion, nor did it significantly increase sealing pressure in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients. Our data suggest that we can keep the i-gel at room temperature for emergency airway management for non-paralysed, sedated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Medical Information Network, Japan 000012287.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4298088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42980882015-01-23 Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial Komasawa, Nobuyasu Nishihara, Isao Tatsumi, Shinichi Minami, Toshiaki BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients. METHODS: A total of 74 adult patients were assigned to the warm (i-gel prewarmed to 42°C; W group; 37 patients) or the control (i-gel kept at room temperature; C group; 37 patients) groups. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. The i-gel was prewarmed to 42°C for 30 min before insertion in the W group, but kept at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for the C group. The number of attempts made until successful insertion and sealing pressure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Insertion was successful with one attempt in 35 cases each for the W and C groups. Two attempts were needed in two cases for the W group and one case for the C group. There was one failed attempt in the C group, but none in the W group. None of the differences between the two groups were significant (p=0.51). Sealing pressure was slightly, but not significantly, higher in the W group than in the C group (W group 22.6±6.1 cm H(2)O; C group 20.7±6.1 cm H(2)O; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Prewarming of the i-gel to 42°C did not increase the success rate of insertion, nor did it significantly increase sealing pressure in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients. Our data suggest that we can keep the i-gel at room temperature for emergency airway management for non-paralysed, sedated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Medical Information Network, Japan 000012287. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4298088/ /pubmed/25586372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Komasawa, Nobuyasu
Nishihara, Isao
Tatsumi, Shinichi
Minami, Toshiaki
Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
title Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653
work_keys_str_mv AT komasawanobuyasu doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nishiharaisao doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tatsumishinichi doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT minamitoshiaki doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial