Cargando…
Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients. METHODS: A total of 74 adult patients were as...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653 |
_version_ | 1782353221559255040 |
---|---|
author | Komasawa, Nobuyasu Nishihara, Isao Tatsumi, Shinichi Minami, Toshiaki |
author_facet | Komasawa, Nobuyasu Nishihara, Isao Tatsumi, Shinichi Minami, Toshiaki |
author_sort | Komasawa, Nobuyasu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients. METHODS: A total of 74 adult patients were assigned to the warm (i-gel prewarmed to 42°C; W group; 37 patients) or the control (i-gel kept at room temperature; C group; 37 patients) groups. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. The i-gel was prewarmed to 42°C for 30 min before insertion in the W group, but kept at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for the C group. The number of attempts made until successful insertion and sealing pressure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Insertion was successful with one attempt in 35 cases each for the W and C groups. Two attempts were needed in two cases for the W group and one case for the C group. There was one failed attempt in the C group, but none in the W group. None of the differences between the two groups were significant (p=0.51). Sealing pressure was slightly, but not significantly, higher in the W group than in the C group (W group 22.6±6.1 cm H(2)O; C group 20.7±6.1 cm H(2)O; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Prewarming of the i-gel to 42°C did not increase the success rate of insertion, nor did it significantly increase sealing pressure in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients. Our data suggest that we can keep the i-gel at room temperature for emergency airway management for non-paralysed, sedated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Medical Information Network, Japan 000012287. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4298088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42980882015-01-23 Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial Komasawa, Nobuyasu Nishihara, Isao Tatsumi, Shinichi Minami, Toshiaki BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients. METHODS: A total of 74 adult patients were assigned to the warm (i-gel prewarmed to 42°C; W group; 37 patients) or the control (i-gel kept at room temperature; C group; 37 patients) groups. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. The i-gel was prewarmed to 42°C for 30 min before insertion in the W group, but kept at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for the C group. The number of attempts made until successful insertion and sealing pressure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Insertion was successful with one attempt in 35 cases each for the W and C groups. Two attempts were needed in two cases for the W group and one case for the C group. There was one failed attempt in the C group, but none in the W group. None of the differences between the two groups were significant (p=0.51). Sealing pressure was slightly, but not significantly, higher in the W group than in the C group (W group 22.6±6.1 cm H(2)O; C group 20.7±6.1 cm H(2)O; p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Prewarming of the i-gel to 42°C did not increase the success rate of insertion, nor did it significantly increase sealing pressure in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients. Our data suggest that we can keep the i-gel at room temperature for emergency airway management for non-paralysed, sedated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University Medical Information Network, Japan 000012287. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4298088/ /pubmed/25586372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesia Komasawa, Nobuyasu Nishihara, Isao Tatsumi, Shinichi Minami, Toshiaki Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Anaesthesia |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT komasawanobuyasu doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nishiharaisao doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tatsumishinichi doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT minamitoshiaki doesprewarmingtheigelsupraglotticairwaydevicefitthelarynxbettercomparedtokeepingitatroomtemperaturefornonparalysedsedatedpatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial |