Cargando…

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers

OBJECTIVE: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for applicants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveys before and after the streamlining. SETTING: The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Researchers who submitted o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Barnett, Adrian G, Graves, Nicholas, Clarke, Philip, Herbert, Danielle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25596201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006912

Ejemplares similares

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study
por: Strand, Linn Beate, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews
por: Sorrell, Lexy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
por: Maggio, Lauren A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Meta-research: justifying career disruption in funding applications, a survey of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study
por: Rowhani-Farid, Anisa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Scientific research output in orthopaedics from China and other top-ranking countries: a 10-year survey of the literature
por: Zou, Yuming, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants
por: Liu, Mengyao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study
por: Barnett, Adrian G., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis
por: Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers
por: Harris, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Employing diffusion of innovation theory for ‘not missing the mass’ in community-engaged research
por: Turin, Tanvir C, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
por: Kojima, Takako, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research
por: Superchi, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Data sharing through an NIH central database repository: a cross-sectional survey of BioLINCC users
por: Ross, Joseph S, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey
por: Sriganesh, Kamath, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
por: Miranda, Jessica Steffany, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting of data on participant ethnicity and socioeconomic status in high-impact medical journals: a targeted literature review
por: Buttery, Sara C, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Improving the evaluation of worldwide biomedical research output: classification method and standardised bibliometric indicators by disease
por: van de Laar, Lissy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study
por: Ivlev, Ilya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Thinker, Soldier, Scribe: cross-sectional study of researchers' roles and author order in the Annals of Internal Medicine
por: Perneger, Thomas V, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Performance curves of medical researchers during their career: analysis of scientific production from a retrospective cohort
por: Duclos, Antoine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel
por: Graves, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals
por: Ravichandran, Caitlin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of the extent of unpublished studies in prognostic factor research: a systematic review of p53 immunohistochemistry in bladder cancer as an example
por: Sekula, Peggy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_gtf4f7k3pjp5spck2q55v6mdhb