Cargando…

Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft

BACKGROUND: Platelet rich plasma is known for its hemostatic, adhesive and healing properties in view of the multiple growth factors released from the platelets to the site of wound. The primary objective of this study was to use autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) in wound beds for anchorage of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: P Waiker, Veena, Shivalingappa, Shanthakumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606477
_version_ 1782353310573920256
author P Waiker, Veena
Shivalingappa, Shanthakumar
author_facet P Waiker, Veena
Shivalingappa, Shanthakumar
author_sort P Waiker, Veena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Platelet rich plasma is known for its hemostatic, adhesive and healing properties in view of the multiple growth factors released from the platelets to the site of wound. The primary objective of this study was to use autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) in wound beds for anchorage of skin grafts instead of conventional methods like sutures, staplers or glue. METHODS: In a single center based randomized controlled prospective study of nine months duration, 200 patients with wounds were divided into two equal groups. Autologous PRP was applied on wound beds in PRP group and conventional methods like staples/sutures used to anchor the skin grafts in a control group. RESULTS: Instant graft adherence to wound bed was statistically significant in the PRP group. Time of first post-graft inspection was delayed, and hematoma, graft edema, discharge from graft site, frequency of dressings and duration of stay in plastic surgery unit were significantly less in the PRP group. CONCLUSION: Autologous PRP ensured instant skin graft adherence to wound bed in comparison to conventional methods of anchorage. Hence, we recommend the use of autologous PRP routinely on wounds prior to resurfacing to ensure the benefits of early healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4298865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42988652015-01-20 Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft P Waiker, Veena Shivalingappa, Shanthakumar World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Platelet rich plasma is known for its hemostatic, adhesive and healing properties in view of the multiple growth factors released from the platelets to the site of wound. The primary objective of this study was to use autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) in wound beds for anchorage of skin grafts instead of conventional methods like sutures, staplers or glue. METHODS: In a single center based randomized controlled prospective study of nine months duration, 200 patients with wounds were divided into two equal groups. Autologous PRP was applied on wound beds in PRP group and conventional methods like staples/sutures used to anchor the skin grafts in a control group. RESULTS: Instant graft adherence to wound bed was statistically significant in the PRP group. Time of first post-graft inspection was delayed, and hematoma, graft edema, discharge from graft site, frequency of dressings and duration of stay in plastic surgery unit were significantly less in the PRP group. CONCLUSION: Autologous PRP ensured instant skin graft adherence to wound bed in comparison to conventional methods of anchorage. Hence, we recommend the use of autologous PRP routinely on wounds prior to resurfacing to ensure the benefits of early healing. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4298865/ /pubmed/25606477 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
P Waiker, Veena
Shivalingappa, Shanthakumar
Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft
title Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft
title_full Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft
title_fullStr Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft
title_short Comparison between Conventional Mechanical Fixation and Use of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Wound Beds Prior to Resurfacing with Split Thickness Skin Graft
title_sort comparison between conventional mechanical fixation and use of autologous platelet rich plasma (prp) in wound beds prior to resurfacing with split thickness skin graft
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606477
work_keys_str_mv AT pwaikerveena comparisonbetweenconventionalmechanicalfixationanduseofautologousplateletrichplasmaprpinwoundbedspriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraft
AT shivalingappashanthakumar comparisonbetweenconventionalmechanicalfixationanduseofautologousplateletrichplasmaprpinwoundbedspriortoresurfacingwithsplitthicknessskingraft