Cargando…

Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the biological interaction of human osteoblasts and cells of the human periodontal ligament (PDL) with different endodontic restorative material as Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, amalgam and composite over a time period of 20 days. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Susanne, Mielert, Jana, Kleinheinz, Johannes, Dammaschke, Till
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25533283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-014-0055-4
_version_ 1782353311726305280
author Jung, Susanne
Mielert, Jana
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Dammaschke, Till
author_facet Jung, Susanne
Mielert, Jana
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Dammaschke, Till
author_sort Jung, Susanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the biological interaction of human osteoblasts and cells of the human periodontal ligament (PDL) with different endodontic restorative material as Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, amalgam and composite over a time period of 20 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human PDL cells and osteoblasts were harvested, cultured and according to standardized protocols. The cell populations were characterized with the corresponding surface markers following standardized procedures. The specimens were produced with special regard to constant dimensions and volume in the different groups. Cell attachment and proliferation were evaluated morphologically after Richardson staining and cell count was performed after 1d, 8d, 13d and 20d. All experiments were performed in triplets. The results were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA- and Tukey-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Morphological analysis proved good proliferation and cell attachment in both cements. A remarkable result was the organized spreading and parallel alignment of the PDL cells in contact with MTA and especially Biodentine (cells maturing in a second cell layer crossway to the first one). From 8d onward Biodentine showed the highest quantity of PDL cells (p < 0.05). Biodentine and MTA resulted in a significantly higher cell density in osteoblast and PDL cell culture. The other groups showed a lower PDL cell density from 8d and a lower osteoblast cell density from 13d when compared to control and cement samples (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MTA and Biodentine showed a good biocompatibility in contact with the human osteoblasts and cells of the periodontal ligament. Regarding cell survival and proliferation particularly of PDL cells Biodentine showed good results and can be considered as a well-tolerated bioactive endodontic material. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13005-014-0055-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4298870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42988702015-01-21 Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study Jung, Susanne Mielert, Jana Kleinheinz, Johannes Dammaschke, Till Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the biological interaction of human osteoblasts and cells of the human periodontal ligament (PDL) with different endodontic restorative material as Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, amalgam and composite over a time period of 20 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human PDL cells and osteoblasts were harvested, cultured and according to standardized protocols. The cell populations were characterized with the corresponding surface markers following standardized procedures. The specimens were produced with special regard to constant dimensions and volume in the different groups. Cell attachment and proliferation were evaluated morphologically after Richardson staining and cell count was performed after 1d, 8d, 13d and 20d. All experiments were performed in triplets. The results were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA- and Tukey-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Morphological analysis proved good proliferation and cell attachment in both cements. A remarkable result was the organized spreading and parallel alignment of the PDL cells in contact with MTA and especially Biodentine (cells maturing in a second cell layer crossway to the first one). From 8d onward Biodentine showed the highest quantity of PDL cells (p < 0.05). Biodentine and MTA resulted in a significantly higher cell density in osteoblast and PDL cell culture. The other groups showed a lower PDL cell density from 8d and a lower osteoblast cell density from 13d when compared to control and cement samples (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MTA and Biodentine showed a good biocompatibility in contact with the human osteoblasts and cells of the periodontal ligament. Regarding cell survival and proliferation particularly of PDL cells Biodentine showed good results and can be considered as a well-tolerated bioactive endodontic material. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13005-014-0055-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4298870/ /pubmed/25533283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-014-0055-4 Text en © Jung et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jung, Susanne
Mielert, Jana
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Dammaschke, Till
Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
title Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
title_full Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
title_short Human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
title_sort human oral cells’ response to different endodontic restorative materials: an in vitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4298870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25533283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-014-0055-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jungsusanne humanoralcellsresponsetodifferentendodonticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT mielertjana humanoralcellsresponsetodifferentendodonticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT kleinheinzjohannes humanoralcellsresponsetodifferentendodonticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT dammaschketill humanoralcellsresponsetodifferentendodonticrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy