Cargando…
“The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Challenging behavior exhibited by people with dementia can have adverse outcomes, like stress, low morale, low work satisfaction and absenteeism for nursing staff in long-term care settings. Training nursing staff to manage challenging behavior may reduce its impact. Although much of the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-014-0046-6 |
_version_ | 1782353375040372736 |
---|---|
author | Hazelhof, Theo J G M Gerritsen, Debby L Schoonhoven, Lisette Koopmans, Raymond T C M |
author_facet | Hazelhof, Theo J G M Gerritsen, Debby L Schoonhoven, Lisette Koopmans, Raymond T C M |
author_sort | Hazelhof, Theo J G M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Challenging behavior exhibited by people with dementia can have adverse outcomes, like stress, low morale, low work satisfaction and absenteeism for nursing staff in long-term care settings. Training nursing staff to manage challenging behavior may reduce its impact. Although much of the research into training nursing staff shows methodological limitations, several studies find some effect of training programs on knowledge about and on management of challenging behavior. Effects on stress or burnout are almost not found. METHODS/DESIGN: The TENSE-study is a randomized controlled study on 18 nursing home units (9 control, 9 intervention) investigating the effects of a continuous educational program for nursing staff about managing challenging behavior. Nursing staff of intervention units receive the program, nursing staff of control units do not and continue usual care. The primary outcome is stress experienced by nursing staff (N = 135). Secondary outcomes are: emotional workload, work satisfaction, stress reactions at work and knowledge about challenging behaviour of nursing staff; and frequency of challenging behavior, quality of life and social engagement of residents (N = 135). Because there are many unknown factors influencing the effect of the training, a process evaluation to evaluate sampling-, implementation- and intervention quality as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation will also be included in the analysis. Nursing staff could not be blinded to the intervention, but were blinded for the outcomes. DISCUSSION: Strengths of this study are the (good) description of the intervention complemented by a process evaluation and the tailoring of the intervention to the wishes and needs of the nursing homes at any moment during the study. Sustaining the effects of the intervention by using follow up sessions is another strength. Possible drawbacks may be dropout because of the frailty of the elderly population and because nursing staff might move to another job during the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR (Dutch Trial Registration) number NTR3620 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4299299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42992992015-01-21 “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial Hazelhof, Theo J G M Gerritsen, Debby L Schoonhoven, Lisette Koopmans, Raymond T C M BMC Nurs Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Challenging behavior exhibited by people with dementia can have adverse outcomes, like stress, low morale, low work satisfaction and absenteeism for nursing staff in long-term care settings. Training nursing staff to manage challenging behavior may reduce its impact. Although much of the research into training nursing staff shows methodological limitations, several studies find some effect of training programs on knowledge about and on management of challenging behavior. Effects on stress or burnout are almost not found. METHODS/DESIGN: The TENSE-study is a randomized controlled study on 18 nursing home units (9 control, 9 intervention) investigating the effects of a continuous educational program for nursing staff about managing challenging behavior. Nursing staff of intervention units receive the program, nursing staff of control units do not and continue usual care. The primary outcome is stress experienced by nursing staff (N = 135). Secondary outcomes are: emotional workload, work satisfaction, stress reactions at work and knowledge about challenging behaviour of nursing staff; and frequency of challenging behavior, quality of life and social engagement of residents (N = 135). Because there are many unknown factors influencing the effect of the training, a process evaluation to evaluate sampling-, implementation- and intervention quality as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation will also be included in the analysis. Nursing staff could not be blinded to the intervention, but were blinded for the outcomes. DISCUSSION: Strengths of this study are the (good) description of the intervention complemented by a process evaluation and the tailoring of the intervention to the wishes and needs of the nursing homes at any moment during the study. Sustaining the effects of the intervention by using follow up sessions is another strength. Possible drawbacks may be dropout because of the frailty of the elderly population and because nursing staff might move to another job during the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR (Dutch Trial Registration) number NTR3620 BioMed Central 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4299299/ /pubmed/25606022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-014-0046-6 Text en © Hazelhof et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hazelhof, Theo J G M Gerritsen, Debby L Schoonhoven, Lisette Koopmans, Raymond T C M “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title | “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full | “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short | “The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | “the educating nursing staff effectively (tense) study”: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-014-0046-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hazelhoftheojgm theeducatingnursingstaffeffectivelytensestudydesignofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gerritsendebbyl theeducatingnursingstaffeffectivelytensestudydesignofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schoonhovenlisette theeducatingnursingstaffeffectivelytensestudydesignofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koopmansraymondtcm theeducatingnursingstaffeffectivelytensestudydesignofaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |