Cargando…

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without

OBJECTIVE: To date only a few randomized controlled studies have compared grafting strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease. This study represents a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of a trial comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Jeffrey, Baskett, Roger JF, Buth, Karen J, Hirsch, Gregory M, Brydie, Allan, Gayner, Ryan, Legare, Jean-Francois
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0203-8
_version_ 1782353387944148992
author Le, Jeffrey
Baskett, Roger JF
Buth, Karen J
Hirsch, Gregory M
Brydie, Allan
Gayner, Ryan
Legare, Jean-Francois
author_facet Le, Jeffrey
Baskett, Roger JF
Buth, Karen J
Hirsch, Gregory M
Brydie, Allan
Gayner, Ryan
Legare, Jean-Francois
author_sort Le, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To date only a few randomized controlled studies have compared grafting strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease. This study represents a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of a trial comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) and CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). METHODS: Consenting patients undergoing non-redo isolated CABG surgery at a single institution were randomized to TAG or LIMA+SVG groups. Exclusion criteria included prior CABG, emergent procedure, concomitant procedure, varicose veins and renal dysfunction. The primary endpoints were: enrolment >20% and completion of CT coronary angiography at 6 months >80%. Statistical investigation was performed on an intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: Of 421 eligible patients, 60 were enrolled and 2 withdrew (n = 30 in TAG, n = 28 LIMA+SVG) for 14% enrolment rate. Patient characteristics were similar in each group. No patients died in hospital and adverse events such as MI, stroke and deep sternal wound infection were not significantly different between groups. Clinical follow-up was complete in 100% of patients, with 44/58 (76%) undergoing CT coronary angio at 6 months. Graft occlusion occurred in 2 patients in each group for patency rates of 89% (TAG) and 91% (LIMA+SVG). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that an RCT comparing grafting strategy is possible but also show that achieving recruitment or follow-up CT may be difficult. Given the excellent patency results and little difference between groups, our findings suggest that the sample size required may make it infeasible to compare graft patency at 6 months as a study end-point. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized Controlled Trial number: ISRCTN80270323. ULTRA-MINI ABSTRACT: Few RCT’s exist comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) compared to CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). This study is a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of such a trial and identify pitfalls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4299408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42994082015-01-21 A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without Le, Jeffrey Baskett, Roger JF Buth, Karen J Hirsch, Gregory M Brydie, Allan Gayner, Ryan Legare, Jean-Francois J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article OBJECTIVE: To date only a few randomized controlled studies have compared grafting strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease. This study represents a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of a trial comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) and CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). METHODS: Consenting patients undergoing non-redo isolated CABG surgery at a single institution were randomized to TAG or LIMA+SVG groups. Exclusion criteria included prior CABG, emergent procedure, concomitant procedure, varicose veins and renal dysfunction. The primary endpoints were: enrolment >20% and completion of CT coronary angiography at 6 months >80%. Statistical investigation was performed on an intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: Of 421 eligible patients, 60 were enrolled and 2 withdrew (n = 30 in TAG, n = 28 LIMA+SVG) for 14% enrolment rate. Patient characteristics were similar in each group. No patients died in hospital and adverse events such as MI, stroke and deep sternal wound infection were not significantly different between groups. Clinical follow-up was complete in 100% of patients, with 44/58 (76%) undergoing CT coronary angio at 6 months. Graft occlusion occurred in 2 patients in each group for patency rates of 89% (TAG) and 91% (LIMA+SVG). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that an RCT comparing grafting strategy is possible but also show that achieving recruitment or follow-up CT may be difficult. Given the excellent patency results and little difference between groups, our findings suggest that the sample size required may make it infeasible to compare graft patency at 6 months as a study end-point. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized Controlled Trial number: ISRCTN80270323. ULTRA-MINI ABSTRACT: Few RCT’s exist comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) compared to CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). This study is a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of such a trial and identify pitfalls. BioMed Central 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4299408/ /pubmed/25567131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0203-8 Text en © Le et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le, Jeffrey
Baskett, Roger JF
Buth, Karen J
Hirsch, Gregory M
Brydie, Allan
Gayner, Ryan
Legare, Jean-Francois
A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
title A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
title_full A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
title_fullStr A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
title_full_unstemmed A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
title_short A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
title_sort pilot randomized controlled trial comparing cabg surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25567131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0203-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lejeffrey apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT baskettrogerjf apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT buthkarenj apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT hirschgregorym apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT brydieallan apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT gaynerryan apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT legarejeanfrancois apilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT lejeffrey pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT baskettrogerjf pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT buthkarenj pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT hirschgregorym pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT brydieallan pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT gaynerryan pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout
AT legarejeanfrancois pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingcabgsurgeryperformedwithtotalarterialgraftsorwithout