Cargando…

Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors

INTRODUCTION: Fixed orthodontic appliances have been regarded as a common causative factor of oral lesions. To manage soft tissue discomfort, most orthodontists recommend using a small amount of utility wax over the brackets in order to alleviate trauma. This in vitro study aimed at evaluating frict...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendonça, Steyner de Lima, Praxedes Neto, Otávio José, de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira, dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra, Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24713564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar
_version_ 1782353389588316160
author Mendonça, Steyner de Lima
Praxedes Neto, Otávio José
de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira
dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra
Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão
author_facet Mendonça, Steyner de Lima
Praxedes Neto, Otávio José
de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira
dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra
Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão
author_sort Mendonça, Steyner de Lima
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fixed orthodontic appliances have been regarded as a common causative factor of oral lesions. To manage soft tissue discomfort, most orthodontists recommend using a small amount of utility wax over the brackets in order to alleviate trauma. This in vitro study aimed at evaluating friction generated by two types of bracket protectors (customized acetate protector [CAP] and temporary resin protector [TRP]) during the initial stages of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: An experimental model (test unit) was used to assess friction. In order to measure the friction produced in each test, the model was attached to a mechanical testing machine which simulated maxillary canines alignment. Intergroup comparison was carried out by one-way ANOVA with level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The friction presented by the TRP group was statistically higher than that of the control group at 6 mm. It was also higher than in the control and CAP groups in terms of maximum friction. CONCLUSION: The customized acetate protector (CAP) demonstrated not to interfere in friction between the wire and the orthodontic bracket slot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4299415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42994152015-01-26 Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors Mendonça, Steyner de Lima Praxedes Neto, Otávio José de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: Fixed orthodontic appliances have been regarded as a common causative factor of oral lesions. To manage soft tissue discomfort, most orthodontists recommend using a small amount of utility wax over the brackets in order to alleviate trauma. This in vitro study aimed at evaluating friction generated by two types of bracket protectors (customized acetate protector [CAP] and temporary resin protector [TRP]) during the initial stages of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: An experimental model (test unit) was used to assess friction. In order to measure the friction produced in each test, the model was attached to a mechanical testing machine which simulated maxillary canines alignment. Intergroup comparison was carried out by one-way ANOVA with level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The friction presented by the TRP group was statistically higher than that of the control group at 6 mm. It was also higher than in the control and CAP groups in terms of maximum friction. CONCLUSION: The customized acetate protector (CAP) demonstrated not to interfere in friction between the wire and the orthodontic bracket slot. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4299415/ /pubmed/24713564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar Text en © 2014 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Mendonça, Steyner de Lima
Praxedes Neto, Otávio José
de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira
dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra
Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão
Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
title Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
title_full Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
title_fullStr Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
title_short Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
title_sort comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24713564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT mendoncasteynerdelima comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors
AT praxedesnetootaviojose comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors
AT deoliveirapatriciateixeira comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors
AT dossantospatriciabittencourtdutra comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors
AT pinheirofabiohenriquedesaleitao comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors