Cargando…
Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors
INTRODUCTION: Fixed orthodontic appliances have been regarded as a common causative factor of oral lesions. To manage soft tissue discomfort, most orthodontists recommend using a small amount of utility wax over the brackets in order to alleviate trauma. This in vitro study aimed at evaluating frict...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24713564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar |
_version_ | 1782353389588316160 |
---|---|
author | Mendonça, Steyner de Lima Praxedes Neto, Otávio José de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão |
author_facet | Mendonça, Steyner de Lima Praxedes Neto, Otávio José de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão |
author_sort | Mendonça, Steyner de Lima |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Fixed orthodontic appliances have been regarded as a common causative factor of oral lesions. To manage soft tissue discomfort, most orthodontists recommend using a small amount of utility wax over the brackets in order to alleviate trauma. This in vitro study aimed at evaluating friction generated by two types of bracket protectors (customized acetate protector [CAP] and temporary resin protector [TRP]) during the initial stages of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: An experimental model (test unit) was used to assess friction. In order to measure the friction produced in each test, the model was attached to a mechanical testing machine which simulated maxillary canines alignment. Intergroup comparison was carried out by one-way ANOVA with level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The friction presented by the TRP group was statistically higher than that of the control group at 6 mm. It was also higher than in the control and CAP groups in terms of maximum friction. CONCLUSION: The customized acetate protector (CAP) demonstrated not to interfere in friction between the wire and the orthodontic bracket slot. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4299415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42994152015-01-26 Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors Mendonça, Steyner de Lima Praxedes Neto, Otávio José de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: Fixed orthodontic appliances have been regarded as a common causative factor of oral lesions. To manage soft tissue discomfort, most orthodontists recommend using a small amount of utility wax over the brackets in order to alleviate trauma. This in vitro study aimed at evaluating friction generated by two types of bracket protectors (customized acetate protector [CAP] and temporary resin protector [TRP]) during the initial stages of orthodontic treatment. METHODS: An experimental model (test unit) was used to assess friction. In order to measure the friction produced in each test, the model was attached to a mechanical testing machine which simulated maxillary canines alignment. Intergroup comparison was carried out by one-way ANOVA with level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The friction presented by the TRP group was statistically higher than that of the control group at 6 mm. It was also higher than in the control and CAP groups in terms of maximum friction. CONCLUSION: The customized acetate protector (CAP) demonstrated not to interfere in friction between the wire and the orthodontic bracket slot. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4299415/ /pubmed/24713564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar Text en © 2014 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Mendonça, Steyner de Lima Praxedes Neto, Otávio José de Oliveira, Patricia Teixeira dos Santos, Patricia Bittencourt Dutra Pinheiro, Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors |
title | Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket
protectors |
title_full | Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket
protectors |
title_fullStr | Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket
protectors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket
protectors |
title_short | Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket
protectors |
title_sort | comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket
protectors |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24713564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mendoncasteynerdelima comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors AT praxedesnetootaviojose comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors AT deoliveirapatriciateixeira comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors AT dossantospatriciabittencourtdutra comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors AT pinheirofabiohenriquedesaleitao comparisonoffrictionproducedbytwotypesoforthodonticbracketprotectors |