Cargando…

Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location

In the present study we investigate age-related changes in hand preference for grasping and the influence of task demands on such preference. Children (2–11), young-adults (17–28) and older-adults (57–90) were examined in a grasp-to-eat and a grasp-to-construct task. The end-goal of these tasks was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzalez, Claudia L. R., Flindall, Jason W., Stone, Kayla D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01579
_version_ 1782353392974168064
author Gonzalez, Claudia L. R.
Flindall, Jason W.
Stone, Kayla D.
author_facet Gonzalez, Claudia L. R.
Flindall, Jason W.
Stone, Kayla D.
author_sort Gonzalez, Claudia L. R.
collection PubMed
description In the present study we investigate age-related changes in hand preference for grasping and the influence of task demands on such preference. Children (2–11), young-adults (17–28) and older-adults (57–90) were examined in a grasp-to-eat and a grasp-to-construct task. The end-goal of these tasks was different (eat vs. construct) as was the nature of the task (unimanual vs. bimanual). In both tasks, ipsilateral and contralateral grasps were analyzed. Results showed a right-hand preference that did not change with age. Across the three age groups, a more robust right-hand preference was observed for the unimanual, grasp-to-eat task. To disentangle if the nature (unimanual) or the end-goal (grasp-to-eat) was the driver of the robust right-hand preference, a follow up experiment was conducted. Young-adult participants completed a unimanual grasp-to-place task. This was contrasted with the unimanual grasp-to-eat task and the bimanual grasp-to-construct task. Rates of hand preference for the grasp-to-eat task remained the highest when compared to the other two grasping tasks. Together, the results demonstrate that hand preference remains stable from childhood to older adulthood, and they suggest that a left hemisphere specialization exists for grasping, particularly when bringing food to the mouth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4299429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42994292015-02-04 Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location Gonzalez, Claudia L. R. Flindall, Jason W. Stone, Kayla D. Front Psychol Psychology In the present study we investigate age-related changes in hand preference for grasping and the influence of task demands on such preference. Children (2–11), young-adults (17–28) and older-adults (57–90) were examined in a grasp-to-eat and a grasp-to-construct task. The end-goal of these tasks was different (eat vs. construct) as was the nature of the task (unimanual vs. bimanual). In both tasks, ipsilateral and contralateral grasps were analyzed. Results showed a right-hand preference that did not change with age. Across the three age groups, a more robust right-hand preference was observed for the unimanual, grasp-to-eat task. To disentangle if the nature (unimanual) or the end-goal (grasp-to-eat) was the driver of the robust right-hand preference, a follow up experiment was conducted. Young-adult participants completed a unimanual grasp-to-place task. This was contrasted with the unimanual grasp-to-eat task and the bimanual grasp-to-construct task. Rates of hand preference for the grasp-to-eat task remained the highest when compared to the other two grasping tasks. Together, the results demonstrate that hand preference remains stable from childhood to older adulthood, and they suggest that a left hemisphere specialization exists for grasping, particularly when bringing food to the mouth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4299429/ /pubmed/25653633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01579 Text en Copyright © 2015 Gonzalez, Flindall and Stone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Gonzalez, Claudia L. R.
Flindall, Jason W.
Stone, Kayla D.
Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
title Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
title_full Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
title_fullStr Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
title_full_unstemmed Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
title_short Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
title_sort hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01579
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezclaudialr handpreferenceacrossthelifespaneffectsofendgoaltasknatureandobjectlocation
AT flindalljasonw handpreferenceacrossthelifespaneffectsofendgoaltasknatureandobjectlocation
AT stonekaylad handpreferenceacrossthelifespaneffectsofendgoaltasknatureandobjectlocation