Cargando…
Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review
Assessing unconsciousness is important to safeguard animal welfare shortly after stunning at the slaughter plant. Indicators that can be visually evaluated are most often used when assessing unconsciousness, as they can be easily applied in slaughter plants. These indicators include reflexes origina...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002596 |
_version_ | 1782353413191761920 |
---|---|
author | Verhoeven, M. T. W. Gerritzen, M. A. Hellebrekers, L. J. Kemp, B. |
author_facet | Verhoeven, M. T. W. Gerritzen, M. A. Hellebrekers, L. J. Kemp, B. |
author_sort | Verhoeven, M. T. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assessing unconsciousness is important to safeguard animal welfare shortly after stunning at the slaughter plant. Indicators that can be visually evaluated are most often used when assessing unconsciousness, as they can be easily applied in slaughter plants. These indicators include reflexes originating from the brain stem (e.g. eye reflexes) or from the spinal cord (e.g. pedal reflex) and behavioural indicators such as loss of posture, vocalisations and rhythmic breathing. When physically stunning an animal, for example, captive bolt, most important indicators looked at are posture, righting reflex, rhythmic breathing and the corneal or palpebral reflex that should all be absent if the animal is unconscious. Spinal reflexes are difficult as a measure of unconsciousness with this type of stunning, as they may occur more vigorous. For stunning methods that do not physically destroy the brain, for example, electrical and gas stunning, most important indicators looked at are posture, righting reflex, natural blinking response, rhythmic breathing, vocalisations and focused eye movement that should all be absent if the animal is unconscious. Brain stem reflexes such as the cornea reflex are difficult as measures of unconsciousness in electrically stunned animals, as they may reflect residual brain stem activity and not necessarily consciousness. Under commercial conditions, none of the indicators mentioned above should be used as a single indicator to determine unconsciousness after stunning. Multiple indicators should be used to determine unconsciousness and sufficient time should be left for the animal to die following exsanguination before starting invasive dressing procedures such as scalding or skinning. The recording and subsequent assessment of brain activity, as presented in an electroencephalogram (EEG), is considered the most objective way to assess unconsciousness compared with reflexes and behavioural indicators, but is only applied in experimental set-ups. Studies performed in an experimental set-up have often looked at either the EEG or reflexes and behavioural indicators and there is a scarcity of studies that correlate these different readout parameters. It is recommended to study these correlations in more detail to investigate the validity of reflexes and behavioural indicators and to accurately determine the point in time at which the animal loses consciousness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4299535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42995352015-04-13 Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review Verhoeven, M. T. W. Gerritzen, M. A. Hellebrekers, L. J. Kemp, B. Animal Behaviour, Welfare and Health Assessing unconsciousness is important to safeguard animal welfare shortly after stunning at the slaughter plant. Indicators that can be visually evaluated are most often used when assessing unconsciousness, as they can be easily applied in slaughter plants. These indicators include reflexes originating from the brain stem (e.g. eye reflexes) or from the spinal cord (e.g. pedal reflex) and behavioural indicators such as loss of posture, vocalisations and rhythmic breathing. When physically stunning an animal, for example, captive bolt, most important indicators looked at are posture, righting reflex, rhythmic breathing and the corneal or palpebral reflex that should all be absent if the animal is unconscious. Spinal reflexes are difficult as a measure of unconsciousness with this type of stunning, as they may occur more vigorous. For stunning methods that do not physically destroy the brain, for example, electrical and gas stunning, most important indicators looked at are posture, righting reflex, natural blinking response, rhythmic breathing, vocalisations and focused eye movement that should all be absent if the animal is unconscious. Brain stem reflexes such as the cornea reflex are difficult as measures of unconsciousness in electrically stunned animals, as they may reflect residual brain stem activity and not necessarily consciousness. Under commercial conditions, none of the indicators mentioned above should be used as a single indicator to determine unconsciousness after stunning. Multiple indicators should be used to determine unconsciousness and sufficient time should be left for the animal to die following exsanguination before starting invasive dressing procedures such as scalding or skinning. The recording and subsequent assessment of brain activity, as presented in an electroencephalogram (EEG), is considered the most objective way to assess unconsciousness compared with reflexes and behavioural indicators, but is only applied in experimental set-ups. Studies performed in an experimental set-up have often looked at either the EEG or reflexes and behavioural indicators and there is a scarcity of studies that correlate these different readout parameters. It is recommended to study these correlations in more detail to investigate the validity of reflexes and behavioural indicators and to accurately determine the point in time at which the animal loses consciousness. Cambridge University Press 2014-10-30 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4299535/ /pubmed/25354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002596 Text en © The Animal Consortium 2014 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Behaviour, Welfare and Health Verhoeven, M. T. W. Gerritzen, M. A. Hellebrekers, L. J. Kemp, B. Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review |
title | Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a
review |
title_full | Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a
review |
title_fullStr | Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a
review |
title_full_unstemmed | Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a
review |
title_short | Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a
review |
title_sort | indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a
review |
topic | Behaviour, Welfare and Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verhoevenmtw indicatorsusedinlivestocktoassessunconsciousnessafterstunningareview AT gerritzenma indicatorsusedinlivestocktoassessunconsciousnessafterstunningareview AT hellebrekerslj indicatorsusedinlivestocktoassessunconsciousnessafterstunningareview AT kempb indicatorsusedinlivestocktoassessunconsciousnessafterstunningareview |