Cargando…

Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment

BACKGROUND: Strategies are needed to help general practitioners (GPs) promote smoking cessation as recommended by guidelines. This study examines whether the quality of action planning among GPs improves their provision of smoking cessation care. METHODS: The effectiveness of a 1-h training programm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verbiest, Marjolein EA, Presseau, Justin, Chavannes, Niels H, Scharloo, Margreet, Kaptein, Ad A, Assendelft, Willem JJ, Crone, Mathilde R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25547978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0180-2
_version_ 1782353415805861888
author Verbiest, Marjolein EA
Presseau, Justin
Chavannes, Niels H
Scharloo, Margreet
Kaptein, Ad A
Assendelft, Willem JJ
Crone, Mathilde R
author_facet Verbiest, Marjolein EA
Presseau, Justin
Chavannes, Niels H
Scharloo, Margreet
Kaptein, Ad A
Assendelft, Willem JJ
Crone, Mathilde R
author_sort Verbiest, Marjolein EA
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strategies are needed to help general practitioners (GPs) promote smoking cessation as recommended by guidelines. This study examines whether the quality of action planning among GPs improves their provision of smoking cessation care. METHODS: The effectiveness of a 1-h training programme was examined in a cluster randomised controlled trial in which 49 GPs participated. GPs who followed the training (intervention group; n = 25) formulated action plans related to i) enquiring about smoking, ii) advising to quit smoking, and iii) arranging follow-up for smokers motivated to quit. GPs also formulated a coping plan for encountering smokers not motivated to quit. The quality of these plans (plan specificity) was rated and, 6 weeks after the training, GPs reported on the performance of these plans (plan enactment). Multilevel regression analyses were used to examine the effects of plan specificity and plan enactment on patient-reported smoking cessation activities of the GPs in the intervention group (n = 1,632 patients) compared with the control group (n = 1,769 patients). RESULTS: Compared to the control group, GPs who formulated a highly specific action plan during the training asked their patients about smoking more often after the training compared to prior to the training (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.51–2.95). GPs were most likely to have asked patients about smoking after the training compared to prior to the training when they had enacted a highly specific formulated action plan (OR 3.08, 95% CI 2.04–4.64). The effects of GP plan specificity and plan enactment on asking patient about smoking were most prominent among GPs who, at baseline, intended to provide smoking cessation care. CONCLUSIONS: A highly specific action plan formulated by a GP on when, how, and by whom patients will be asked about smoking had a positive effect on GPs’ asking patients about smoking, especially when these professionals also reported to have enacted this plan. This effect was most prominent among GPs who intended to provide smoking cessation care prior to the intervention. Training in devising personalised coping plans is recommended to further increase GPs’ provision of advice to quit smoking and arranging follow-up support to quit smoking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4299546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42995462015-01-21 Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment Verbiest, Marjolein EA Presseau, Justin Chavannes, Niels H Scharloo, Margreet Kaptein, Ad A Assendelft, Willem JJ Crone, Mathilde R Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Strategies are needed to help general practitioners (GPs) promote smoking cessation as recommended by guidelines. This study examines whether the quality of action planning among GPs improves their provision of smoking cessation care. METHODS: The effectiveness of a 1-h training programme was examined in a cluster randomised controlled trial in which 49 GPs participated. GPs who followed the training (intervention group; n = 25) formulated action plans related to i) enquiring about smoking, ii) advising to quit smoking, and iii) arranging follow-up for smokers motivated to quit. GPs also formulated a coping plan for encountering smokers not motivated to quit. The quality of these plans (plan specificity) was rated and, 6 weeks after the training, GPs reported on the performance of these plans (plan enactment). Multilevel regression analyses were used to examine the effects of plan specificity and plan enactment on patient-reported smoking cessation activities of the GPs in the intervention group (n = 1,632 patients) compared with the control group (n = 1,769 patients). RESULTS: Compared to the control group, GPs who formulated a highly specific action plan during the training asked their patients about smoking more often after the training compared to prior to the training (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.51–2.95). GPs were most likely to have asked patients about smoking after the training compared to prior to the training when they had enacted a highly specific formulated action plan (OR 3.08, 95% CI 2.04–4.64). The effects of GP plan specificity and plan enactment on asking patient about smoking were most prominent among GPs who, at baseline, intended to provide smoking cessation care. CONCLUSIONS: A highly specific action plan formulated by a GP on when, how, and by whom patients will be asked about smoking had a positive effect on GPs’ asking patients about smoking, especially when these professionals also reported to have enacted this plan. This effect was most prominent among GPs who intended to provide smoking cessation care prior to the intervention. Training in devising personalised coping plans is recommended to further increase GPs’ provision of advice to quit smoking and arranging follow-up support to quit smoking. BioMed Central 2014-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4299546/ /pubmed/25547978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0180-2 Text en © Verbiest et al.; licensee BioMed Central 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Verbiest, Marjolein EA
Presseau, Justin
Chavannes, Niels H
Scharloo, Margreet
Kaptein, Ad A
Assendelft, Willem JJ
Crone, Mathilde R
Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
title Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
title_full Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
title_fullStr Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
title_full_unstemmed Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
title_short Use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
title_sort use of action planning to increase provision of smoking cessation care by general practitioners: role of plan specificity and enactment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25547978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0180-2
work_keys_str_mv AT verbiestmarjoleinea useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment
AT presseaujustin useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment
AT chavannesnielsh useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment
AT scharloomargreet useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment
AT kapteinada useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment
AT assendelftwillemjj useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment
AT cronemathilder useofactionplanningtoincreaseprovisionofsmokingcessationcarebygeneralpractitionersroleofplanspecificityandenactment