Cargando…
Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography
BACKGROUND: Mammography is the primary imaging technique for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the contrast of a mammogram image is often poor, especially for dense and glandular tissues. In these cases the radiologist may miss some diagnostically important microcalcifications. In o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628822 |
_version_ | 1782353424593977344 |
---|---|
author | Moradmand, Hajar Setayeshi, Saeed Karimian, Ali Reza Sirous, Mehri Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil |
author_facet | Moradmand, Hajar Setayeshi, Saeed Karimian, Ali Reza Sirous, Mehri Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil |
author_sort | Moradmand, Hajar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mammography is the primary imaging technique for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the contrast of a mammogram image is often poor, especially for dense and glandular tissues. In these cases the radiologist may miss some diagnostically important microcalcifications. In order to improve diagnosis of cancer correctly, image enhancement technology is often used to enhance the image and help radiologists. METHODS: This paper presents a comparative study in digital mammography image enhancement based on four different algorithms: wavelet-based enhancement (Asymmetric Daubechies of order 8), Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), morphological operators and unsharp masking. These algorithms have been tested on 114 clinical digital mammography images. The comparison for all the proposed image enhancement techniques was carried out to find out the best technique in enhancement of the mammogram images to detect microcalcifications. RESULTS: For evaluation of performance of image enhancement algorithms, the Contrast Improvement Index (CII) and profile intensity surface area distribution curve quality assessment have been used after any enhancement. The results of this study have shown that the average of CII is about 2.61 for wavelet and for CLAHE, unsharp masking and morphology operation are about 2.047, 1.63 and 1.315 respectively. CONCLUSION: Experimental results strongly suggest that the wavelet transformation can be more effective and improve significantly overall detection of the Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system especially for dense breast. Compare to other studies, our method achieved a higher CII. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4299620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42996202015-01-27 Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography Moradmand, Hajar Setayeshi, Saeed Karimian, Ali Reza Sirous, Mehri Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Iran J Cancer Prev Original Article BACKGROUND: Mammography is the primary imaging technique for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the contrast of a mammogram image is often poor, especially for dense and glandular tissues. In these cases the radiologist may miss some diagnostically important microcalcifications. In order to improve diagnosis of cancer correctly, image enhancement technology is often used to enhance the image and help radiologists. METHODS: This paper presents a comparative study in digital mammography image enhancement based on four different algorithms: wavelet-based enhancement (Asymmetric Daubechies of order 8), Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), morphological operators and unsharp masking. These algorithms have been tested on 114 clinical digital mammography images. The comparison for all the proposed image enhancement techniques was carried out to find out the best technique in enhancement of the mammogram images to detect microcalcifications. RESULTS: For evaluation of performance of image enhancement algorithms, the Contrast Improvement Index (CII) and profile intensity surface area distribution curve quality assessment have been used after any enhancement. The results of this study have shown that the average of CII is about 2.61 for wavelet and for CLAHE, unsharp masking and morphology operation are about 2.047, 1.63 and 1.315 respectively. CONCLUSION: Experimental results strongly suggest that the wavelet transformation can be more effective and improve significantly overall detection of the Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system especially for dense breast. Compare to other studies, our method achieved a higher CII. Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC4299620/ /pubmed/25628822 Text en © 2014 Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moradmand, Hajar Setayeshi, Saeed Karimian, Ali Reza Sirous, Mehri Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography |
title | Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography |
title_full | Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography |
title_short | Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography |
title_sort | comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628822 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moradmandhajar comparingtheperformanceofimageenhancementmethodstodetectmicrocalcificationclustersindigitalmammography AT setayeshisaeed comparingtheperformanceofimageenhancementmethodstodetectmicrocalcificationclustersindigitalmammography AT karimianalireza comparingtheperformanceofimageenhancementmethodstodetectmicrocalcificationclustersindigitalmammography AT sirousmehri comparingtheperformanceofimageenhancementmethodstodetectmicrocalcificationclustersindigitalmammography AT akbarimohammadesmaeil comparingtheperformanceofimageenhancementmethodstodetectmicrocalcificationclustersindigitalmammography |