Cargando…

Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur

BACKGROUND: The transfemoral and the extended trochanteric osteotomies are the most common osteotomies used in femoral revision, both when proximal or diaphyseal fixation of the new component has been decided. We present an alternative approach to the trochanteric osteotomies, most frequently used w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Megas, Panagiotis, Georgiou, Christos S, Panagopoulos, Andreas, Kouzelis, Antonis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25551372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0137-9
_version_ 1782353436863365120
author Megas, Panagiotis
Georgiou, Christos S
Panagopoulos, Andreas
Kouzelis, Antonis
author_facet Megas, Panagiotis
Georgiou, Christos S
Panagopoulos, Andreas
Kouzelis, Antonis
author_sort Megas, Panagiotis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transfemoral and the extended trochanteric osteotomies are the most common osteotomies used in femoral revision, both when proximal or diaphyseal fixation of the new component has been decided. We present an alternative approach to the trochanteric osteotomies, most frequently used with distally fixated stems, to overcome their shortcomings of osteotomy migration and nonunion, but, most of all, the uncontrollable fragmentation of the femur. METHODS: The procedure includes a complete circular femoral osteotomy just below the stem tip to prevent distal fracture propagation and a subsequent preplanned segmentation of the proximal femur for better exposure and fast removal of the old prosthesis. The bone fragments are reattached with cerclage wires to the revision prosthesis, which is safely anchored distally. A modified posterolateral approach is used, as the preservation of the continuity of the abductors, the greater trochanter, and the vastus lateralis is a prerequisite. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, 47 stems (33 women, 14 men, mean age 68 years, range 39–88 years) were revised using this technique. They were 12 (26%) stable and 35 (74%) loose prostheses and were all revised to tapered, fluted, grit-blasted stems. No fracture of the trochanters or the distal femur occurred intraoperatively. Mean follow-up was 28 months (range 6–70 months). No case of trochanteric migration or nonunion of the osteotomies was recorded. Restoration of the preexisting bone defects occurred in 83% of the patients. Three patients required repeat revision due to dislocation and one due to a postoperative periprosthetic fracture. None of the failures was attributed to the procedure itself. CONCLUSIONS: This new osteotomy technique may seem aggressive at first, but, at least in our hands, has effectively increased the speed of the femoral revision, particularly for the most difficult well-fixed components, but not at the expense of safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4299768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42997682015-01-21 Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur Megas, Panagiotis Georgiou, Christos S Panagopoulos, Andreas Kouzelis, Antonis J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The transfemoral and the extended trochanteric osteotomies are the most common osteotomies used in femoral revision, both when proximal or diaphyseal fixation of the new component has been decided. We present an alternative approach to the trochanteric osteotomies, most frequently used with distally fixated stems, to overcome their shortcomings of osteotomy migration and nonunion, but, most of all, the uncontrollable fragmentation of the femur. METHODS: The procedure includes a complete circular femoral osteotomy just below the stem tip to prevent distal fracture propagation and a subsequent preplanned segmentation of the proximal femur for better exposure and fast removal of the old prosthesis. The bone fragments are reattached with cerclage wires to the revision prosthesis, which is safely anchored distally. A modified posterolateral approach is used, as the preservation of the continuity of the abductors, the greater trochanter, and the vastus lateralis is a prerequisite. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, 47 stems (33 women, 14 men, mean age 68 years, range 39–88 years) were revised using this technique. They were 12 (26%) stable and 35 (74%) loose prostheses and were all revised to tapered, fluted, grit-blasted stems. No fracture of the trochanters or the distal femur occurred intraoperatively. Mean follow-up was 28 months (range 6–70 months). No case of trochanteric migration or nonunion of the osteotomies was recorded. Restoration of the preexisting bone defects occurred in 83% of the patients. Three patients required repeat revision due to dislocation and one due to a postoperative periprosthetic fracture. None of the failures was attributed to the procedure itself. CONCLUSIONS: This new osteotomy technique may seem aggressive at first, but, at least in our hands, has effectively increased the speed of the femoral revision, particularly for the most difficult well-fixed components, but not at the expense of safety. BioMed Central 2014-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4299768/ /pubmed/25551372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0137-9 Text en © Megas et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Megas, Panagiotis
Georgiou, Christos S
Panagopoulos, Andreas
Kouzelis, Antonis
Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
title Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
title_full Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
title_fullStr Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
title_full_unstemmed Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
title_short Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
title_sort removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25551372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0137-9
work_keys_str_mv AT megaspanagiotis removalofwellfixedcomponentsinfemoralrevisionarthroplastywithcontrolledsegmentationoftheproximalfemur
AT georgiouchristoss removalofwellfixedcomponentsinfemoralrevisionarthroplastywithcontrolledsegmentationoftheproximalfemur
AT panagopoulosandreas removalofwellfixedcomponentsinfemoralrevisionarthroplastywithcontrolledsegmentationoftheproximalfemur
AT kouzelisantonis removalofwellfixedcomponentsinfemoralrevisionarthroplastywithcontrolledsegmentationoftheproximalfemur