Cargando…

Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow

The major aim of this study was to compare the morphology and activity of rumen protozoa of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow using in vitro digestibility and gas production parameters of steam treated sugarcane pith. Rumen fluid obtained from two buffalo and cow steers fed the same diet, 30:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabari, Safora, Eslami, Moosa, Chaji, Morteza, Mohammadabadi, Tahereh, Bojarpour, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Urmia University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610581
_version_ 1782353463323131904
author Jabari, Safora
Eslami, Moosa
Chaji, Morteza
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Bojarpour, Mohammad
author_facet Jabari, Safora
Eslami, Moosa
Chaji, Morteza
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Bojarpour, Mohammad
author_sort Jabari, Safora
collection PubMed
description The major aim of this study was to compare the morphology and activity of rumen protozoa of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow using in vitro digestibility and gas production parameters of steam treated sugarcane pith. Rumen fluid obtained from two buffalo and cow steers fed the same diet, 30:70 concentrate: forage. To separate rumen protozoa, antibiotic solution and fungicides were added to rumen fluid. The results of present experiment indicated that the neutral detergent fiber (NDF; 7.8 vs. 1.69%) and acid detergent fiber (ADF; 6.24 vs. 3.24%) digestibility of steam treated sugarcane pith by rumen protozoal population of Khuzestan buffalo was higher than those of cow (p < 0.05). Also, digestibility of dry matter, NDF and ADF by whole buffalo micro-organisms was more than those in cow (p < 0.05). The results indicated that the potential of gas production of sugarcane pith by rumen protozoa in water buffalo was more than that of cow (p < 0.05). Total rumen ciliate protozoa numbers in water buffalo were significantly higher than those of cow (3.68 × 10(5) vs. 2.18 × 10(5) mL(-1) of rumen content) (p < 0.05). The number of Diplodinium in buffalo was more than that of cow (41.27 vs. 35.7% of total rumen protozoa, respectively). Percentage of Entodinium, Epidinium, Ophryoscolex and Isotricha in cow was more than those of buffalo. Therefore, in the same diet, protozoa and total rumen micro-organisms of Khuzestan water buffalo have higher digestion activity compared to Holstein cow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4299995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Urmia University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42999952015-01-21 Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow Jabari, Safora Eslami, Moosa Chaji, Morteza Mohammadabadi, Tahereh Bojarpour, Mohammad Vet Res Forum Original Article The major aim of this study was to compare the morphology and activity of rumen protozoa of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow using in vitro digestibility and gas production parameters of steam treated sugarcane pith. Rumen fluid obtained from two buffalo and cow steers fed the same diet, 30:70 concentrate: forage. To separate rumen protozoa, antibiotic solution and fungicides were added to rumen fluid. The results of present experiment indicated that the neutral detergent fiber (NDF; 7.8 vs. 1.69%) and acid detergent fiber (ADF; 6.24 vs. 3.24%) digestibility of steam treated sugarcane pith by rumen protozoal population of Khuzestan buffalo was higher than those of cow (p < 0.05). Also, digestibility of dry matter, NDF and ADF by whole buffalo micro-organisms was more than those in cow (p < 0.05). The results indicated that the potential of gas production of sugarcane pith by rumen protozoa in water buffalo was more than that of cow (p < 0.05). Total rumen ciliate protozoa numbers in water buffalo were significantly higher than those of cow (3.68 × 10(5) vs. 2.18 × 10(5) mL(-1) of rumen content) (p < 0.05). The number of Diplodinium in buffalo was more than that of cow (41.27 vs. 35.7% of total rumen protozoa, respectively). Percentage of Entodinium, Epidinium, Ophryoscolex and Isotricha in cow was more than those of buffalo. Therefore, in the same diet, protozoa and total rumen micro-organisms of Khuzestan water buffalo have higher digestion activity compared to Holstein cow. Urmia University Press 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4299995/ /pubmed/25610581 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jabari, Safora
Eslami, Moosa
Chaji, Morteza
Mohammadabadi, Tahereh
Bojarpour, Mohammad
Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow
title Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow
title_full Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow
title_fullStr Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow
title_full_unstemmed Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow
title_short Comparison digestibility and protozoa population of Khuzestan water buffalo and Holstein cow
title_sort comparison digestibility and protozoa population of khuzestan water buffalo and holstein cow
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4299995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610581
work_keys_str_mv AT jabarisafora comparisondigestibilityandprotozoapopulationofkhuzestanwaterbuffaloandholsteincow
AT eslamimoosa comparisondigestibilityandprotozoapopulationofkhuzestanwaterbuffaloandholsteincow
AT chajimorteza comparisondigestibilityandprotozoapopulationofkhuzestanwaterbuffaloandholsteincow
AT mohammadabaditahereh comparisondigestibilityandprotozoapopulationofkhuzestanwaterbuffaloandholsteincow
AT bojarpourmohammad comparisondigestibilityandprotozoapopulationofkhuzestanwaterbuffaloandholsteincow