Cargando…

Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of two different alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists on lower urinary tract symptoms in patients who underwent LDR-brachytherapy. METHODS: A total of 141 patients who had been clinically diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and underwent LDR-brachytherapy were enr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Nobumichi, Torimoto, Kazumasa, Asakawa, Isao, Miyake, Makito, Anai, Satoshi, Hirayama, Akihide, Hasegawa, Masatoshi, Konishi, Noboru, Fujimoto, Kiyohide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25544509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0302-7
_version_ 1782353475687940096
author Tanaka, Nobumichi
Torimoto, Kazumasa
Asakawa, Isao
Miyake, Makito
Anai, Satoshi
Hirayama, Akihide
Hasegawa, Masatoshi
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
author_facet Tanaka, Nobumichi
Torimoto, Kazumasa
Asakawa, Isao
Miyake, Makito
Anai, Satoshi
Hirayama, Akihide
Hasegawa, Masatoshi
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
author_sort Tanaka, Nobumichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of two different alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists on lower urinary tract symptoms in patients who underwent LDR-brachytherapy. METHODS: A total of 141 patients who had been clinically diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and underwent LDR-brachytherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized and allocated to two groups (silodosin 8 mg vs. naftopidil 75 mg). The primary endpoint was a change in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at 3 months after seed implantation. Secondary endpoints included the recovery rate of IPSS at 12 months after seed implantation, the change in IPSS and overactive bladder symptom score, uroflowmetric parameters, and frequency volume chart (FVC). To determine independent variables that can predict IPSS recovery, logistic regression analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The mean change in the IPSS at 3 months after seed implantation in both groups was ⊿10.6 (naftopidil) and ⊿10.4 (silodosin), respectively. There was not a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.728). An increase in urinary frequency and a decrease in total urinated volume and mean voided volume were observed in FVC for 12 months after seed implantation. Multivariate analysis revealed that the urethral dose (UD30) was an independent predictive parameter of IPSS recovery. Patients with UD30 < 200Gy showed a higher recovery rate of IPSS at 12 months after seed implantation. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference of serial change in IPSS between silodosin and naftopidil during the first year after seed implantation. A lower dose on the urethra was an independent predictor of IPSS recovery at 12 months after seed implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43000482015-01-21 Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil - Tanaka, Nobumichi Torimoto, Kazumasa Asakawa, Isao Miyake, Makito Anai, Satoshi Hirayama, Akihide Hasegawa, Masatoshi Konishi, Noboru Fujimoto, Kiyohide Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of two different alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists on lower urinary tract symptoms in patients who underwent LDR-brachytherapy. METHODS: A total of 141 patients who had been clinically diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and underwent LDR-brachytherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized and allocated to two groups (silodosin 8 mg vs. naftopidil 75 mg). The primary endpoint was a change in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at 3 months after seed implantation. Secondary endpoints included the recovery rate of IPSS at 12 months after seed implantation, the change in IPSS and overactive bladder symptom score, uroflowmetric parameters, and frequency volume chart (FVC). To determine independent variables that can predict IPSS recovery, logistic regression analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The mean change in the IPSS at 3 months after seed implantation in both groups was ⊿10.6 (naftopidil) and ⊿10.4 (silodosin), respectively. There was not a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.728). An increase in urinary frequency and a decrease in total urinated volume and mean voided volume were observed in FVC for 12 months after seed implantation. Multivariate analysis revealed that the urethral dose (UD30) was an independent predictive parameter of IPSS recovery. Patients with UD30 < 200Gy showed a higher recovery rate of IPSS at 12 months after seed implantation. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference of serial change in IPSS between silodosin and naftopidil during the first year after seed implantation. A lower dose on the urethra was an independent predictor of IPSS recovery at 12 months after seed implantation. BioMed Central 2014-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4300048/ /pubmed/25544509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0302-7 Text en © Tanaka et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tanaka, Nobumichi
Torimoto, Kazumasa
Asakawa, Isao
Miyake, Makito
Anai, Satoshi
Hirayama, Akihide
Hasegawa, Masatoshi
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
title Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
title_full Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
title_fullStr Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
title_full_unstemmed Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
title_short Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
title_sort use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil -
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25544509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0302-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakanobumichi useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT torimotokazumasa useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT asakawaisao useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT miyakemakito useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT anaisatoshi useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT hirayamaakihide useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT hasegawamasatoshi useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT konishinoboru useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil
AT fujimotokiyohide useofalpha1adrenoceptorantagonistsinpatientswhounderwentlowdoseratebrachytherapyforprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledtrialofsilodosinversusnaftopidil