Cargando…
Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Among methods for preventing pneumonia and possibly also bacteremia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, Selective Digestive Decontamination (SDD) appears most effective within randomized concurrent controlled trials (RCCT’s) although more recent trials have been cluster randomized. Ho...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25551776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x |
_version_ | 1782353477593202688 |
---|---|
author | Hurley, James C |
author_facet | Hurley, James C |
author_sort | Hurley, James C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Among methods for preventing pneumonia and possibly also bacteremia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, Selective Digestive Decontamination (SDD) appears most effective within randomized concurrent controlled trials (RCCT’s) although more recent trials have been cluster randomized. However, of the SDD components, whether protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP) is required, and whether the topical antibiotic actually presents a contextual hazard, remain unresolved. The objective here is to compare the bacteremia rates and patterns of isolates in SDD-RCCT’s versus the broader evidence base. METHODS: Bacteremia incidence proportion data were extracted from component (control and intervention) groups decanted from studies investigating antibiotic (SDD) or non-antibiotic methods of VAP prevention and summarized using random effects meta-analysis of study and group level data. A reference category of groups derived from purely observational studies without any prevention method under study provided a benchmark incidence. RESULTS: Within SDD RCCTs, the mean bacteremia incidence among concurrent component groups not exposed to PPAP (27 control; 17.1%; 13.1-22.1% and 12 intervention groups; 16.2%; 9.1-27.3%) is double that of the benchmark bacteremia incidence derived from 39 benchmark groups (8.3; 6.8-10.2%) and also 20 control groups from studies of non-antibiotic methods (7.1%; 4.8 – 10.5). There is a selective increase in coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) but not in Pseudomonas aeruginosa among bacteremia isolates within control groups of SDD-RCCT’s versus benchmark groups with data available. CONCLUSIONS: The topical antibiotic component of SDD presents a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia against which the PPAP component partially mitigates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4300056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43000562015-01-21 Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis Hurley, James C BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Among methods for preventing pneumonia and possibly also bacteremia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, Selective Digestive Decontamination (SDD) appears most effective within randomized concurrent controlled trials (RCCT’s) although more recent trials have been cluster randomized. However, of the SDD components, whether protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP) is required, and whether the topical antibiotic actually presents a contextual hazard, remain unresolved. The objective here is to compare the bacteremia rates and patterns of isolates in SDD-RCCT’s versus the broader evidence base. METHODS: Bacteremia incidence proportion data were extracted from component (control and intervention) groups decanted from studies investigating antibiotic (SDD) or non-antibiotic methods of VAP prevention and summarized using random effects meta-analysis of study and group level data. A reference category of groups derived from purely observational studies without any prevention method under study provided a benchmark incidence. RESULTS: Within SDD RCCTs, the mean bacteremia incidence among concurrent component groups not exposed to PPAP (27 control; 17.1%; 13.1-22.1% and 12 intervention groups; 16.2%; 9.1-27.3%) is double that of the benchmark bacteremia incidence derived from 39 benchmark groups (8.3; 6.8-10.2%) and also 20 control groups from studies of non-antibiotic methods (7.1%; 4.8 – 10.5). There is a selective increase in coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) but not in Pseudomonas aeruginosa among bacteremia isolates within control groups of SDD-RCCT’s versus benchmark groups with data available. CONCLUSIONS: The topical antibiotic component of SDD presents a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia against which the PPAP component partially mitigates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4300056/ /pubmed/25551776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x Text en © Hurley; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hurley, James C Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
title | Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25551776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurleyjamesc topicalantibioticsasamajorcontextualhazardtowardbacteremiawithinselectivedigestivedecontaminationstudiesametaanalysis |