Cargando…

Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model

BACKGROUND: Primary care research is at a crossroad in South Pacific. A steering committee comprising a member of WONCA Asia Pacific Regional (APR) council and the President of Fiji College of General Practitioners garnered sponsorship from Fiji Ministry of Health, WONCA APR and pharmaceutical agenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Ngiap Chuan, Ng, Chirk Jenn, Rosemary, Mitchell, Wahid, Khan, Goh, Lee Gan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12930-014-0017-9
_version_ 1782353483937087488
author Tan, Ngiap Chuan
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Rosemary, Mitchell
Wahid, Khan
Goh, Lee Gan
author_facet Tan, Ngiap Chuan
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Rosemary, Mitchell
Wahid, Khan
Goh, Lee Gan
author_sort Tan, Ngiap Chuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care research is at a crossroad in South Pacific. A steering committee comprising a member of WONCA Asia Pacific Regional (APR) council and the President of Fiji College of General Practitioners garnered sponsorship from Fiji Ministry of Health, WONCA APR and pharmaceutical agencies to organize the event in October 2013. This paper describes the processes needed to set up a national primary research agenda through the collaborative efforts of local stakeholders and external facilitators using a test case in South Pacific. METHOD: The setting was a 2-day primary care research workshop in Fiji. The steering committee invited a team of three external facilitators from the Asia-Pacific region to organize and operationalize the workshop. The eventual participants were 3 external facilitators, 6 local facilitators, and 29 local primary care physicians, academics, and local medical leaders from Fiji and South Pacific Islands. Pre-workshop and main workshop programs were drawn up by the external facilitators, using participants’ input of research topics relating to their local clinical issues of interest. Course notes were prepared and distributed before the workshop. In the workshop, proposed research topics were shortlisted by group discussion and consensus. Study designs were proposed, scrutinized, and adopted for further research development. RESULTS: The facilitators reviewed the processes in setting the research agenda after the workshop and conceived the proposed 6E model. These processes can be grouped for easy reference, comprising the pre-workshop stages of “entreat”, “enlist”, “engage”, and the workshop stages of “educe”, “empower”, and “encapsulate”. CONCLUSION: The 6E model to establish a research agenda is conceptually logical. Its feasibility can be further tested in its application in other situation where research agenda setting is the critical step to improve the quality of primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43001502015-01-21 Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model Tan, Ngiap Chuan Ng, Chirk Jenn Rosemary, Mitchell Wahid, Khan Goh, Lee Gan Asia Pac Fam Med Research BACKGROUND: Primary care research is at a crossroad in South Pacific. A steering committee comprising a member of WONCA Asia Pacific Regional (APR) council and the President of Fiji College of General Practitioners garnered sponsorship from Fiji Ministry of Health, WONCA APR and pharmaceutical agencies to organize the event in October 2013. This paper describes the processes needed to set up a national primary research agenda through the collaborative efforts of local stakeholders and external facilitators using a test case in South Pacific. METHOD: The setting was a 2-day primary care research workshop in Fiji. The steering committee invited a team of three external facilitators from the Asia-Pacific region to organize and operationalize the workshop. The eventual participants were 3 external facilitators, 6 local facilitators, and 29 local primary care physicians, academics, and local medical leaders from Fiji and South Pacific Islands. Pre-workshop and main workshop programs were drawn up by the external facilitators, using participants’ input of research topics relating to their local clinical issues of interest. Course notes were prepared and distributed before the workshop. In the workshop, proposed research topics were shortlisted by group discussion and consensus. Study designs were proposed, scrutinized, and adopted for further research development. RESULTS: The facilitators reviewed the processes in setting the research agenda after the workshop and conceived the proposed 6E model. These processes can be grouped for easy reference, comprising the pre-workshop stages of “entreat”, “enlist”, “engage”, and the workshop stages of “educe”, “empower”, and “encapsulate”. CONCLUSION: The 6E model to establish a research agenda is conceptually logical. Its feasibility can be further tested in its application in other situation where research agenda setting is the critical step to improve the quality of primary care. BioMed Central 2014-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4300150/ /pubmed/25606021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12930-014-0017-9 Text en © Tan et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tan, Ngiap Chuan
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Rosemary, Mitchell
Wahid, Khan
Goh, Lee Gan
Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
title Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
title_full Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
title_fullStr Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
title_full_unstemmed Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
title_short Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
title_sort developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6e” model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12930-014-0017-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tanngiapchuan developingaprimarycareresearchagendathroughcollaborativeeffortsaproposed6emodel
AT ngchirkjenn developingaprimarycareresearchagendathroughcollaborativeeffortsaproposed6emodel
AT rosemarymitchell developingaprimarycareresearchagendathroughcollaborativeeffortsaproposed6emodel
AT wahidkhan developingaprimarycareresearchagendathroughcollaborativeeffortsaproposed6emodel
AT gohleegan developingaprimarycareresearchagendathroughcollaborativeeffortsaproposed6emodel