Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.47898 |
_version_ | 1782353504384319488 |
---|---|
author | Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka Rosołowski, Mariusz Wróblewski, Eugeniusz Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dąbrowski, Andrzej |
author_facet | Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka Rosołowski, Mariusz Wróblewski, Eugeniusz Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dąbrowski, Andrzej |
author_sort | Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation modalities have confirmed the superiority of one of these techniques over the others. AIM: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of the use of a device enabling both injection of adrenaline solution and bipolar electrocoagulation (A + BE) to those of combined adrenaline injection with mechanical therapy (haemostatic clips) (A + HC) in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two subjects with bleeding ulcers were assigned to the A + BE group, and 55 patients were treated with A + HC. RESULTS: Overall, treatment failed in 20 patients (20/107, 18.7%): in 10 individuals from the A + BE group (10/52; 18.2%) and in 10 individuals from the A + HC group (10/55; 19.2%) (p > 0.05). Primary haemostasis was not obtained in 7 patients (6.5%): in 4 patients in the A + BE group and in 3 patients in the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Ten individuals (9.3%) experienced recurrent bleeding during hospitalisation: 4 patients from the A + BE group and 6 patients from the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Finally, in 96.3% of the patients (n = 103) the endoscopic treatment proved efficient with regards to obtaining haemostasis during hospitalisation. Surgical intervention was required in 4 individuals (3.7%): 2 patients in the A + BE group and 2 patients treated with A + HC (p > 0.05). Three patients (2.8%) – all from the A + HC group – died during hospitalisation. No significant intergroup differences were documented with regards to the mean number of transfused blood units and the mean length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of combined endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding with a probe enabling simultaneous bipolar electrocoagulation and adrenaline injection seems comparable to the widely used dual technique of adrenaline injection and haemostatic clipping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4300351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43003512015-02-04 Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka Rosołowski, Mariusz Wróblewski, Eugeniusz Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dąbrowski, Andrzej Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation modalities have confirmed the superiority of one of these techniques over the others. AIM: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of the use of a device enabling both injection of adrenaline solution and bipolar electrocoagulation (A + BE) to those of combined adrenaline injection with mechanical therapy (haemostatic clips) (A + HC) in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two subjects with bleeding ulcers were assigned to the A + BE group, and 55 patients were treated with A + HC. RESULTS: Overall, treatment failed in 20 patients (20/107, 18.7%): in 10 individuals from the A + BE group (10/52; 18.2%) and in 10 individuals from the A + HC group (10/55; 19.2%) (p > 0.05). Primary haemostasis was not obtained in 7 patients (6.5%): in 4 patients in the A + BE group and in 3 patients in the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Ten individuals (9.3%) experienced recurrent bleeding during hospitalisation: 4 patients from the A + BE group and 6 patients from the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Finally, in 96.3% of the patients (n = 103) the endoscopic treatment proved efficient with regards to obtaining haemostasis during hospitalisation. Surgical intervention was required in 4 individuals (3.7%): 2 patients in the A + BE group and 2 patients treated with A + HC (p > 0.05). Three patients (2.8%) – all from the A + HC group – died during hospitalisation. No significant intergroup differences were documented with regards to the mean number of transfused blood units and the mean length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of combined endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding with a probe enabling simultaneous bipolar electrocoagulation and adrenaline injection seems comparable to the widely used dual technique of adrenaline injection and haemostatic clipping. Termedia Publishing House 2014-12-30 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4300351/ /pubmed/25653731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.47898 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka Rosołowski, Mariusz Wróblewski, Eugeniusz Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dąbrowski, Andrzej Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
title | Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.47898 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swidnickasiergiejkoagnieszka comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation AT rosołowskimariusz comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation AT wroblewskieugeniusz comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation AT baniukiewiczandrzej comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation AT dabrowskiandrzej comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation |