Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation

INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka, Rosołowski, Mariusz, Wróblewski, Eugeniusz, Baniukiewicz, Andrzej, Dąbrowski, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653731
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.47898
_version_ 1782353504384319488
author Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka
Rosołowski, Mariusz
Wróblewski, Eugeniusz
Baniukiewicz, Andrzej
Dąbrowski, Andrzej
author_facet Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka
Rosołowski, Mariusz
Wróblewski, Eugeniusz
Baniukiewicz, Andrzej
Dąbrowski, Andrzej
author_sort Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation modalities have confirmed the superiority of one of these techniques over the others. AIM: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of the use of a device enabling both injection of adrenaline solution and bipolar electrocoagulation (A + BE) to those of combined adrenaline injection with mechanical therapy (haemostatic clips) (A + HC) in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two subjects with bleeding ulcers were assigned to the A + BE group, and 55 patients were treated with A + HC. RESULTS: Overall, treatment failed in 20 patients (20/107, 18.7%): in 10 individuals from the A + BE group (10/52; 18.2%) and in 10 individuals from the A + HC group (10/55; 19.2%) (p > 0.05). Primary haemostasis was not obtained in 7 patients (6.5%): in 4 patients in the A + BE group and in 3 patients in the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Ten individuals (9.3%) experienced recurrent bleeding during hospitalisation: 4 patients from the A + BE group and 6 patients from the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Finally, in 96.3% of the patients (n = 103) the endoscopic treatment proved efficient with regards to obtaining haemostasis during hospitalisation. Surgical intervention was required in 4 individuals (3.7%): 2 patients in the A + BE group and 2 patients treated with A + HC (p > 0.05). Three patients (2.8%) – all from the A + HC group – died during hospitalisation. No significant intergroup differences were documented with regards to the mean number of transfused blood units and the mean length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of combined endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding with a probe enabling simultaneous bipolar electrocoagulation and adrenaline injection seems comparable to the widely used dual technique of adrenaline injection and haemostatic clipping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43003512015-02-04 Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka Rosołowski, Mariusz Wróblewski, Eugeniusz Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dąbrowski, Andrzej Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer remains the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment of bleeding with simultaneous combination of two endoscopic techniques has proved to be more efficient than monotherapy. None of the published comparative studies of various contact coagulation modalities have confirmed the superiority of one of these techniques over the others. AIM: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of the use of a device enabling both injection of adrenaline solution and bipolar electrocoagulation (A + BE) to those of combined adrenaline injection with mechanical therapy (haemostatic clips) (A + HC) in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two subjects with bleeding ulcers were assigned to the A + BE group, and 55 patients were treated with A + HC. RESULTS: Overall, treatment failed in 20 patients (20/107, 18.7%): in 10 individuals from the A + BE group (10/52; 18.2%) and in 10 individuals from the A + HC group (10/55; 19.2%) (p > 0.05). Primary haemostasis was not obtained in 7 patients (6.5%): in 4 patients in the A + BE group and in 3 patients in the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Ten individuals (9.3%) experienced recurrent bleeding during hospitalisation: 4 patients from the A + BE group and 6 patients from the A + HC group (p > 0.05). Finally, in 96.3% of the patients (n = 103) the endoscopic treatment proved efficient with regards to obtaining haemostasis during hospitalisation. Surgical intervention was required in 4 individuals (3.7%): 2 patients in the A + BE group and 2 patients treated with A + HC (p > 0.05). Three patients (2.8%) – all from the A + HC group – died during hospitalisation. No significant intergroup differences were documented with regards to the mean number of transfused blood units and the mean length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of combined endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding with a probe enabling simultaneous bipolar electrocoagulation and adrenaline injection seems comparable to the widely used dual technique of adrenaline injection and haemostatic clipping. Termedia Publishing House 2014-12-30 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4300351/ /pubmed/25653731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.47898 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Świdnicka-Siergiejko, Agnieszka
Rosołowski, Mariusz
Wróblewski, Eugeniusz
Baniukiewicz, Andrzej
Dąbrowski, Andrzej
Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
title Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of two combined therapies for peptic ulcer bleeding: adrenaline injection plus haemoclipping versus adrenaline injection followed by bipolar electrocoagulation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653731
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2014.47898
work_keys_str_mv AT swidnickasiergiejkoagnieszka comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation
AT rosołowskimariusz comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation
AT wroblewskieugeniusz comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation
AT baniukiewiczandrzej comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation
AT dabrowskiandrzej comparisonoftheefficacyoftwocombinedtherapiesforpepticulcerbleedingadrenalineinjectionplushaemoclippingversusadrenalineinjectionfollowedbybipolarelectrocoagulation