Cargando…
Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2014.47816 |
_version_ | 1782353506711109632 |
---|---|
author | Bahadur, Yasir A. Constantinescu, Camelia Hassouna, Ashraf H. Eltaher, Maha M. Ghassal, Noor M. Awad, Nesreen A. |
author_facet | Bahadur, Yasir A. Constantinescu, Camelia Hassouna, Ashraf H. Eltaher, Maha M. Ghassal, Noor M. Awad, Nesreen A. |
author_sort | Bahadur, Yasir A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly selected 12 patients with endometrial carcinoma, who received adjuvant vaginal cuff HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel applicator. For each brachytherapy fraction, two inverse treatment plans (for central channel and multichannel loadings) were performed and compared. The advantage of fractional re-planning was also investigated. RESULTS: Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) analysis showed limited, but statistically significant difference (p = 0.007) regarding clinical-target-volume dose coverage between single and multichannel approaches. For the organs-at-risk rectum and bladder, the use of multichannel applicator demonstrated a noticeable dose reduction, when compared to single channel, but statistically significant for rectum only (p = 0.0001). For D(2cc) of rectum, an average fractional dose of 6.1 ± 0.7 Gy resulted for single channel vs. 5.1 ± 0.6 Gy for multichannel. For D(2cc) of bladder, an average fractional dose of 5 ± 0.9 Gy occurred for single channel vs. 4.9 ± 0.8 Gy for multichannel. The dosimetric benefit of fractional re-planning was demonstrated: DVH analysis showed large, but not statistically significant differences between first fraction plan and fractional re-planning, due to large inter-fraction variations for rectum and bladder positioning and filling. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel vaginal applicator and inverse planning provides dosimetric advantages over single channel cylinder, by reducing the dose to organs at risk without compromising the target volume coverage, but at the expense of an increased vaginal mucosa dose. Due to large inter-fraction dose variations, we recommend individual fraction treatment plan optimization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4300361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43003612015-04-01 Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning Bahadur, Yasir A. Constantinescu, Camelia Hassouna, Ashraf H. Eltaher, Maha M. Ghassal, Noor M. Awad, Nesreen A. J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly selected 12 patients with endometrial carcinoma, who received adjuvant vaginal cuff HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel applicator. For each brachytherapy fraction, two inverse treatment plans (for central channel and multichannel loadings) were performed and compared. The advantage of fractional re-planning was also investigated. RESULTS: Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) analysis showed limited, but statistically significant difference (p = 0.007) regarding clinical-target-volume dose coverage between single and multichannel approaches. For the organs-at-risk rectum and bladder, the use of multichannel applicator demonstrated a noticeable dose reduction, when compared to single channel, but statistically significant for rectum only (p = 0.0001). For D(2cc) of rectum, an average fractional dose of 6.1 ± 0.7 Gy resulted for single channel vs. 5.1 ± 0.6 Gy for multichannel. For D(2cc) of bladder, an average fractional dose of 5 ± 0.9 Gy occurred for single channel vs. 4.9 ± 0.8 Gy for multichannel. The dosimetric benefit of fractional re-planning was demonstrated: DVH analysis showed large, but not statistically significant differences between first fraction plan and fractional re-planning, due to large inter-fraction variations for rectum and bladder positioning and filling. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel vaginal applicator and inverse planning provides dosimetric advantages over single channel cylinder, by reducing the dose to organs at risk without compromising the target volume coverage, but at the expense of an increased vaginal mucosa dose. Due to large inter-fraction dose variations, we recommend individual fraction treatment plan optimization. Termedia Publishing House 2014-12-31 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300361/ /pubmed/25834580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2014.47816 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bahadur, Yasir A. Constantinescu, Camelia Hassouna, Ashraf H. Eltaher, Maha M. Ghassal, Noor M. Awad, Nesreen A. Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
title | Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
title_full | Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
title_fullStr | Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
title_short | Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
title_sort | single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2014.47816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bahaduryasira singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning AT constantinescucamelia singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning AT hassounaashrafh singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning AT eltahermaham singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning AT ghassalnoorm singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning AT awadnesreena singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning |