Cargando…

Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahadur, Yasir A., Constantinescu, Camelia, Hassouna, Ashraf H., Eltaher, Maha M., Ghassal, Noor M., Awad, Nesreen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834580
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2014.47816
_version_ 1782353506711109632
author Bahadur, Yasir A.
Constantinescu, Camelia
Hassouna, Ashraf H.
Eltaher, Maha M.
Ghassal, Noor M.
Awad, Nesreen A.
author_facet Bahadur, Yasir A.
Constantinescu, Camelia
Hassouna, Ashraf H.
Eltaher, Maha M.
Ghassal, Noor M.
Awad, Nesreen A.
author_sort Bahadur, Yasir A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly selected 12 patients with endometrial carcinoma, who received adjuvant vaginal cuff HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel applicator. For each brachytherapy fraction, two inverse treatment plans (for central channel and multichannel loadings) were performed and compared. The advantage of fractional re-planning was also investigated. RESULTS: Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) analysis showed limited, but statistically significant difference (p = 0.007) regarding clinical-target-volume dose coverage between single and multichannel approaches. For the organs-at-risk rectum and bladder, the use of multichannel applicator demonstrated a noticeable dose reduction, when compared to single channel, but statistically significant for rectum only (p = 0.0001). For D(2cc) of rectum, an average fractional dose of 6.1 ± 0.7 Gy resulted for single channel vs. 5.1 ± 0.6 Gy for multichannel. For D(2cc) of bladder, an average fractional dose of 5 ± 0.9 Gy occurred for single channel vs. 4.9 ± 0.8 Gy for multichannel. The dosimetric benefit of fractional re-planning was demonstrated: DVH analysis showed large, but not statistically significant differences between first fraction plan and fractional re-planning, due to large inter-fraction variations for rectum and bladder positioning and filling. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel vaginal applicator and inverse planning provides dosimetric advantages over single channel cylinder, by reducing the dose to organs at risk without compromising the target volume coverage, but at the expense of an increased vaginal mucosa dose. Due to large inter-fraction dose variations, we recommend individual fraction treatment plan optimization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43003612015-04-01 Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning Bahadur, Yasir A. Constantinescu, Camelia Hassouna, Ashraf H. Eltaher, Maha M. Ghassal, Noor M. Awad, Nesreen A. J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly selected 12 patients with endometrial carcinoma, who received adjuvant vaginal cuff HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel applicator. For each brachytherapy fraction, two inverse treatment plans (for central channel and multichannel loadings) were performed and compared. The advantage of fractional re-planning was also investigated. RESULTS: Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) analysis showed limited, but statistically significant difference (p = 0.007) regarding clinical-target-volume dose coverage between single and multichannel approaches. For the organs-at-risk rectum and bladder, the use of multichannel applicator demonstrated a noticeable dose reduction, when compared to single channel, but statistically significant for rectum only (p = 0.0001). For D(2cc) of rectum, an average fractional dose of 6.1 ± 0.7 Gy resulted for single channel vs. 5.1 ± 0.6 Gy for multichannel. For D(2cc) of bladder, an average fractional dose of 5 ± 0.9 Gy occurred for single channel vs. 4.9 ± 0.8 Gy for multichannel. The dosimetric benefit of fractional re-planning was demonstrated: DVH analysis showed large, but not statistically significant differences between first fraction plan and fractional re-planning, due to large inter-fraction variations for rectum and bladder positioning and filling. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel vaginal applicator and inverse planning provides dosimetric advantages over single channel cylinder, by reducing the dose to organs at risk without compromising the target volume coverage, but at the expense of an increased vaginal mucosa dose. Due to large inter-fraction dose variations, we recommend individual fraction treatment plan optimization. Termedia Publishing House 2014-12-31 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300361/ /pubmed/25834580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2014.47816 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bahadur, Yasir A.
Constantinescu, Camelia
Hassouna, Ashraf H.
Eltaher, Maha M.
Ghassal, Noor M.
Awad, Nesreen A.
Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
title Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
title_full Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
title_fullStr Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
title_short Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
title_sort single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834580
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2014.47816
work_keys_str_mv AT bahaduryasira singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning
AT constantinescucamelia singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning
AT hassounaashrafh singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning
AT eltahermaham singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning
AT ghassalnoorm singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning
AT awadnesreena singleversusmultichannelapplicatorinhighdoseratevaginalbrachytherapyoptimizedbyinversetreatmentplanning