Cargando…

Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception

Perception routinely integrates inputs from different senses. Stimulus temporal proximity critically determines whether or not these inputs are bound together. Despite the temporal window of integration being a widely accepted notion, its neurophysiological substrate remains unclear. Many types of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cecere, Roberto, Rees, Geraint, Romei, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25544613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.034
_version_ 1782353514490494976
author Cecere, Roberto
Rees, Geraint
Romei, Vincenzo
author_facet Cecere, Roberto
Rees, Geraint
Romei, Vincenzo
author_sort Cecere, Roberto
collection PubMed
description Perception routinely integrates inputs from different senses. Stimulus temporal proximity critically determines whether or not these inputs are bound together. Despite the temporal window of integration being a widely accepted notion, its neurophysiological substrate remains unclear. Many types of common audio-visual interactions occur within a time window of ∼100 ms [1–5]. For example, in the sound-induced double-flash illusion, when two beeps are presented within ∼100 ms together with one flash, a second illusory flash is often perceived [2]. Due to their intrinsic rhythmic nature, brain oscillations are one candidate mechanism for gating the temporal window of integration. Interestingly, occipital alpha band oscillations cycle on average every ∼100 ms, with peak frequencies ranging between 8 and 14 Hz (i.e., 120–60 ms cycle). Moreover, presenting a brief tone can phase-reset such oscillations in visual cortex [6, 7]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the duration of each alpha cycle might provide the temporal unit to bind audio-visual events. Here, we first recorded EEG while participants performed the sound-induced double-flash illusion task [4] and found positive correlation between individual alpha frequency (IAF) peak and the size of the temporal window of the illusion. Participants then performed the same task while receiving occipital transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), to modulate oscillatory activity [8] either at their IAF or at off-peak alpha frequencies (IAF±2 Hz). Compared to IAF tACS, IAF−2 Hz and IAF+2 Hz tACS, respectively, enlarged and shrunk the temporal window of illusion, suggesting that alpha oscillations might represent the temporal unit of visual processing that cyclically gates perception and the neurophysiological substrate promoting audio-visual interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43003992015-01-23 Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception Cecere, Roberto Rees, Geraint Romei, Vincenzo Curr Biol Report Perception routinely integrates inputs from different senses. Stimulus temporal proximity critically determines whether or not these inputs are bound together. Despite the temporal window of integration being a widely accepted notion, its neurophysiological substrate remains unclear. Many types of common audio-visual interactions occur within a time window of ∼100 ms [1–5]. For example, in the sound-induced double-flash illusion, when two beeps are presented within ∼100 ms together with one flash, a second illusory flash is often perceived [2]. Due to their intrinsic rhythmic nature, brain oscillations are one candidate mechanism for gating the temporal window of integration. Interestingly, occipital alpha band oscillations cycle on average every ∼100 ms, with peak frequencies ranging between 8 and 14 Hz (i.e., 120–60 ms cycle). Moreover, presenting a brief tone can phase-reset such oscillations in visual cortex [6, 7]. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the duration of each alpha cycle might provide the temporal unit to bind audio-visual events. Here, we first recorded EEG while participants performed the sound-induced double-flash illusion task [4] and found positive correlation between individual alpha frequency (IAF) peak and the size of the temporal window of the illusion. Participants then performed the same task while receiving occipital transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), to modulate oscillatory activity [8] either at their IAF or at off-peak alpha frequencies (IAF±2 Hz). Compared to IAF tACS, IAF−2 Hz and IAF+2 Hz tACS, respectively, enlarged and shrunk the temporal window of illusion, suggesting that alpha oscillations might represent the temporal unit of visual processing that cyclically gates perception and the neurophysiological substrate promoting audio-visual interactions. Cell Press 2015-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4300399/ /pubmed/25544613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.034 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Report
Cecere, Roberto
Rees, Geraint
Romei, Vincenzo
Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception
title Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception
title_full Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception
title_fullStr Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception
title_full_unstemmed Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception
title_short Individual Differences in Alpha Frequency Drive Crossmodal Illusory Perception
title_sort individual differences in alpha frequency drive crossmodal illusory perception
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25544613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.034
work_keys_str_mv AT cecereroberto individualdifferencesinalphafrequencydrivecrossmodalillusoryperception
AT reesgeraint individualdifferencesinalphafrequencydrivecrossmodalillusoryperception
AT romeivincenzo individualdifferencesinalphafrequencydrivecrossmodalillusoryperception