Cargando…

On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients

BACKGROUND: There are some conflicting results with Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CCABG) with arrested heart in coronary high-risk patients. Moreover, performing off-pump CABG in these cases may be associated with serious complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afrasiabirad, Abbas, Safaie, Naser, Montazergaem, Hosein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25650152
_version_ 1782353528930435072
author Afrasiabirad, Abbas
Safaie, Naser
Montazergaem, Hosein
author_facet Afrasiabirad, Abbas
Safaie, Naser
Montazergaem, Hosein
author_sort Afrasiabirad, Abbas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are some conflicting results with Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CCABG) with arrested heart in coronary high-risk patients. Moreover, performing off-pump CABG in these cases may be associated with serious complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the on-pump beating CABG (OPBCABG) in coronary high-risk patients in comparison with the conventional methods. METHODS: In a prospective research study, 3000 off-pump CABG patients were considered during June 2003 to December 2011. Among these, 157 patients with one or more of the following risk factors were included for OPBCABG; severe left main stenosis, early post-acute myocardial infarction with ongoing chest pain, unstable angina, intractable ventricular arrhythmia, post complicated coronary intervention and severe left ventricular dysfunction. These patients were compared with 157 similar patients undergone CCABG with aortic cross clamp before 2003. RESULTS: Preoperative patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups. The patients’ mean age and number of grafts were 57 years and 3 per patient respectively. Hospital mortality was 3.2% and 9% in OPBCABG and CCABG groups, respectively (P<0.001). Preoperative myocardial infarction, requirement of inotropic agents and intraaortic balloon pump, renal dysfunction and prolonged ventilation time were significantly higher in CCABG group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that OPBCABG is effective in coronary high-risk patients and significantly reduces mortality and the incidence of perioperative MI and other major complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43004792015-02-03 On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients Afrasiabirad, Abbas Safaie, Naser Montazergaem, Hosein Iran J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: There are some conflicting results with Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CCABG) with arrested heart in coronary high-risk patients. Moreover, performing off-pump CABG in these cases may be associated with serious complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the on-pump beating CABG (OPBCABG) in coronary high-risk patients in comparison with the conventional methods. METHODS: In a prospective research study, 3000 off-pump CABG patients were considered during June 2003 to December 2011. Among these, 157 patients with one or more of the following risk factors were included for OPBCABG; severe left main stenosis, early post-acute myocardial infarction with ongoing chest pain, unstable angina, intractable ventricular arrhythmia, post complicated coronary intervention and severe left ventricular dysfunction. These patients were compared with 157 similar patients undergone CCABG with aortic cross clamp before 2003. RESULTS: Preoperative patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups. The patients’ mean age and number of grafts were 57 years and 3 per patient respectively. Hospital mortality was 3.2% and 9% in OPBCABG and CCABG groups, respectively (P<0.001). Preoperative myocardial infarction, requirement of inotropic agents and intraaortic balloon pump, renal dysfunction and prolonged ventilation time were significantly higher in CCABG group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that OPBCABG is effective in coronary high-risk patients and significantly reduces mortality and the incidence of perioperative MI and other major complications. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300479/ /pubmed/25650152 Text en © 2015: Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Afrasiabirad, Abbas
Safaie, Naser
Montazergaem, Hosein
On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients
title On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients
title_full On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients
title_fullStr On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients
title_full_unstemmed On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients
title_short On-Pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass in High Risk Coronary Patients
title_sort on-pump beating coronary artery bypass in high risk coronary patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25650152
work_keys_str_mv AT afrasiabiradabbas onpumpbeatingcoronaryarterybypassinhighriskcoronarypatients
AT safaienaser onpumpbeatingcoronaryarterybypassinhighriskcoronarypatients
AT montazergaemhosein onpumpbeatingcoronaryarterybypassinhighriskcoronarypatients