Cargando…
Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3 |
_version_ | 1782353544688435200 |
---|---|
author | Roth, Klaus Edgar Mueller, Ramona Schwand, Eike Maier, Gerrit Stefen Schmidtmann, Irene Sariyar, Murat Maus, Uwe |
author_facet | Roth, Klaus Edgar Mueller, Ramona Schwand, Eike Maier, Gerrit Stefen Schmidtmann, Irene Sariyar, Murat Maus, Uwe |
author_sort | Roth, Klaus Edgar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques. METHODS: 16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High-resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3-D polygon models. Post-operative models were subtracted from pre-operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation. RESULTS: The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm(3) in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm(3) in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p > 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm(3) per 1 mg/cm(3) areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient’s complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4300584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43005842015-01-22 Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans Roth, Klaus Edgar Mueller, Ramona Schwand, Eike Maier, Gerrit Stefen Schmidtmann, Irene Sariyar, Murat Maus, Uwe J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques. METHODS: 16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High-resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3-D polygon models. Post-operative models were subtracted from pre-operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation. RESULTS: The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm(3) in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm(3) in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p > 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm(3) per 1 mg/cm(3) areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient’s complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4300584/ /pubmed/25610496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3 Text en © Roth et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Roth, Klaus Edgar Mueller, Ramona Schwand, Eike Maier, Gerrit Stefen Schmidtmann, Irene Sariyar, Murat Maus, Uwe Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans |
title | Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans |
title_full | Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans |
title_fullStr | Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans |
title_short | Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans |
title_sort | open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional ct scans |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rothklausedgar openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans AT muellerramona openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans AT schwandeike openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans AT maiergerritstefen openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans AT schmidtmannirene openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans AT sariyarmurat openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans AT mausuwe openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans |