Cargando…

Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans

BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Klaus Edgar, Mueller, Ramona, Schwand, Eike, Maier, Gerrit Stefen, Schmidtmann, Irene, Sariyar, Murat, Maus, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
_version_ 1782353544688435200
author Roth, Klaus Edgar
Mueller, Ramona
Schwand, Eike
Maier, Gerrit Stefen
Schmidtmann, Irene
Sariyar, Murat
Maus, Uwe
author_facet Roth, Klaus Edgar
Mueller, Ramona
Schwand, Eike
Maier, Gerrit Stefen
Schmidtmann, Irene
Sariyar, Murat
Maus, Uwe
author_sort Roth, Klaus Edgar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques. METHODS: 16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High-resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3-D polygon models. Post-operative models were subtracted from pre-operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation. RESULTS: The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm(3) in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm(3) in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p > 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm(3) per 1 mg/cm(3) areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient’s complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43005842015-01-22 Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans Roth, Klaus Edgar Mueller, Ramona Schwand, Eike Maier, Gerrit Stefen Schmidtmann, Irene Sariyar, Murat Maus, Uwe J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques. METHODS: 16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High-resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3-D polygon models. Post-operative models were subtracted from pre-operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation. RESULTS: The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm(3) in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm(3) in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p > 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm(3) per 1 mg/cm(3) areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient’s complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4300584/ /pubmed/25610496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3 Text en © Roth et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Roth, Klaus Edgar
Mueller, Ramona
Schwand, Eike
Maier, Gerrit Stefen
Schmidtmann, Irene
Sariyar, Murat
Maus, Uwe
Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
title Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
title_full Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
title_fullStr Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
title_full_unstemmed Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
title_short Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans
title_sort open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional ct scans
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rothklausedgar openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans
AT muellerramona openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans
AT schwandeike openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans
AT maiergerritstefen openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans
AT schmidtmannirene openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans
AT sariyarmurat openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans
AT mausuwe openversusendoscopicboneresectionofthedorsolateralcalcanealedgeacadavericanalysiscomparingthreedimensionalctscans