Cargando…

Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements

BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty is regarded as a promising treatment for myelopathy and radiculopathy as an alternative to cervical spine fusion. On the basis of 2-year clinical data for the PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Disc (Medtronic, Memphis, Tennessee), the Food and Drug Administration recommende...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurtz, Steven M., Ciccarelli, Lauren, Harper, Megan L., Siskey, Ryan, Shorez, Jacob, Chan, Frank W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.03.002
_version_ 1782353577569681408
author Kurtz, Steven M.
Ciccarelli, Lauren
Harper, Megan L.
Siskey, Ryan
Shorez, Jacob
Chan, Frank W.
author_facet Kurtz, Steven M.
Ciccarelli, Lauren
Harper, Megan L.
Siskey, Ryan
Shorez, Jacob
Chan, Frank W.
author_sort Kurtz, Steven M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty is regarded as a promising treatment for myelopathy and radiculopathy as an alternative to cervical spine fusion. On the basis of 2-year clinical data for the PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Disc (Medtronic, Memphis, Tennessee), the Food and Drug Administration recommended conditional approval in September 2006 and final approval in July 2007; however, relatively little is known about its wear and damage modes in vivo. The main objective was to analyze the tribological findings of the PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Disc. This study characterized the in vivo wear patterns of retrieved cervical discs and tested the hypothesis that the total disc replacements exhibited similar surface morphology and wear patterns in vitro as in vivo. METHODS: Ten explanted total disc replacements (PRESTIGE(®), PRESTIGE(®) I, and PRESTIGE(®) II) from 10 patients retrieved after a mean of 1.8 years (range, 0.3–4.1 years) were analyzed. Wear testing included coupled lateral bending ( ±4.7°) and axial rotation ( ±3.8°) with a 49 N axial load for 5 million cycles followed by 10 million cycles of flexion-extension ( ±9.7°) with 148 N. Implant surfaces were characterized by the use of white-light interferometry, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive spectroscopy. RESULTS: The explants generally exhibited a slightly discolored, elliptic wear region of varying dimension centered in the bearing center, with the long axis oriented in the medial-lateral direction. Abrasive wear was the dominant in vivo wear mechanism, with microscopic scratches generally oriented in the medial-lateral direction. Wear testing resulted in severe abrasive wear in a curvilinear fashion oriented primarily in the medial-lateral direction. All retrievals showed evidence of an abrasive wear mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: This study documented important similarity between the wear mechanisms of components tested in vitro and explanted PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Discs; however, the severity of wear was much greater during the in vitro test compared with the retrievals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43008702015-02-18 Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements Kurtz, Steven M. Ciccarelli, Lauren Harper, Megan L. Siskey, Ryan Shorez, Jacob Chan, Frank W. Int J Spine Surg Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty is regarded as a promising treatment for myelopathy and radiculopathy as an alternative to cervical spine fusion. On the basis of 2-year clinical data for the PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Disc (Medtronic, Memphis, Tennessee), the Food and Drug Administration recommended conditional approval in September 2006 and final approval in July 2007; however, relatively little is known about its wear and damage modes in vivo. The main objective was to analyze the tribological findings of the PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Disc. This study characterized the in vivo wear patterns of retrieved cervical discs and tested the hypothesis that the total disc replacements exhibited similar surface morphology and wear patterns in vitro as in vivo. METHODS: Ten explanted total disc replacements (PRESTIGE(®), PRESTIGE(®) I, and PRESTIGE(®) II) from 10 patients retrieved after a mean of 1.8 years (range, 0.3–4.1 years) were analyzed. Wear testing included coupled lateral bending ( ±4.7°) and axial rotation ( ±3.8°) with a 49 N axial load for 5 million cycles followed by 10 million cycles of flexion-extension ( ±9.7°) with 148 N. Implant surfaces were characterized by the use of white-light interferometry, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive spectroscopy. RESULTS: The explants generally exhibited a slightly discolored, elliptic wear region of varying dimension centered in the bearing center, with the long axis oriented in the medial-lateral direction. Abrasive wear was the dominant in vivo wear mechanism, with microscopic scratches generally oriented in the medial-lateral direction. Wear testing resulted in severe abrasive wear in a curvilinear fashion oriented primarily in the medial-lateral direction. All retrievals showed evidence of an abrasive wear mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: This study documented important similarity between the wear mechanisms of components tested in vitro and explanted PRESTIGE(®) Cervical Discs; however, the severity of wear was much greater during the in vitro test compared with the retrievals. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300870/ /pubmed/25694884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.03.002 Text en © 2012 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Kurtz, Steven M.
Ciccarelli, Lauren
Harper, Megan L.
Siskey, Ryan
Shorez, Jacob
Chan, Frank W.
Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
title Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
title_full Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
title_fullStr Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
title_short Comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
title_sort comparison of in vivo and simulator-retrieved metal-on-metal cervical disc replacements
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT kurtzstevenm comparisonofinvivoandsimulatorretrievedmetalonmetalcervicaldiscreplacements
AT ciccarellilauren comparisonofinvivoandsimulatorretrievedmetalonmetalcervicaldiscreplacements
AT harpermeganl comparisonofinvivoandsimulatorretrievedmetalonmetalcervicaldiscreplacements
AT siskeyryan comparisonofinvivoandsimulatorretrievedmetalonmetalcervicaldiscreplacements
AT shorezjacob comparisonofinvivoandsimulatorretrievedmetalonmetalcervicaldiscreplacements
AT chanfrankw comparisonofinvivoandsimulatorretrievedmetalonmetalcervicaldiscreplacements