Cargando…
The effect of minimally invasive posterior cervical approaches versus open anterior approaches on neck pain and disability
BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical approach to the cervical spine may have an influence on patient outcome, particularly with respect to future neck pain and disability. Some surgeons suggest that patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy and significant axial pain should be treated with an anterior...
Autores principales: | Steinberg, Jeffrey A., German, John W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.11.003 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Benefits of the Paraspinal Muscle-Sparing Approach Versus the Conventional Midline Approach for Posterior Nonfusion Stabilization: Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Functional Outcomes
por: Anand, Neel, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Cost-utility analysis modeling at 2-year follow-up for cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A single-center contribution to the randomized controlled trial
por: Warren, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Minimally invasive trans-sacral approach to L5-S1 interbody fusion: Preliminary results from 1 center and review of the literature
por: Bradley, W. Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Minimal clinically important difference of the Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis Symptoms and Disability questionnaire
por: Florczynski, Matthew, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior versus posterior approach
por: Lin, Dasheng, et al.
Publicado: (2012)