Cargando…
Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
BACKGROUND: The treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with transpedicular cement augmentation has grown significantly over the last 20 years. There is still uncertainty about long-term and midterm effects of polymethyl methacrylate in trabecular bone. Preservation of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.005 |
_version_ | 1782353582028226560 |
---|---|
author | Krüger, Antonio Oberkircher, Ludwig Kratz, Marita Baroud, Gamal Becker, Stephan Ruchholtz, Steffen |
author_facet | Krüger, Antonio Oberkircher, Ludwig Kratz, Marita Baroud, Gamal Becker, Stephan Ruchholtz, Steffen |
author_sort | Krüger, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with transpedicular cement augmentation has grown significantly over the last 20 years. There is still uncertainty about long-term and midterm effects of polymethyl methacrylate in trabecular bone. Preservation of the trabecular structures, as well as interdigitation of the cement with the surrounding bone, therefore has been gaining increasing attention. Interdigitation of cement is likely relevant for biological healing and the biomechanical augmentation process. In this study a cutting and grinding technique was used to evaluate the interdigitation for 4 augmentation techniques. METHODS: By use of a standardized protocol, wedge fractures were created in vertebrae taken from a fresh-frozen spine. Thereafter the vertebrae were assigned to 1 of 4 similar groups with regard to the vertebral size and force required to produce the fracture. The 4 groups were randomized to the following augmentation techniques: balloon kyphoplasty, radiofrequency (RF) kyphoplasty, shield kyphoplasty, and vertebral stenting. Histologic analysis was designed to examine the bone structure and interdigitation after the augmentation. RESULTS: For the void-creating procedures, the distance between bone and cement was 341.4 ± 173.7 µm and 413.6 ± 167.6 µm for vertebral stenting and balloon kyphoplasty, respectively. Specifically, the trabecular bone was condensed around the cement, forming a shield of condensed bone. The procedures without a balloon resulted in shorter distances of 151.2 ± 111.4 µm and 228.1 ± 183.6 µm for RF and shield kyphoplasty, respectively. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .0001). The percentage of interdigitation was higher for the procedures that did not use a balloon: 16.7% ± 9.7% for balloon kyphoplasty, 20.5% ± 12.9% for vertebral stenting, 66.45% ± 12.35% for RF kyphoplasty, and 48.61% ± 20.56% for shield kyphoplasty. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity-creating procedures reduce the cement interdigitation significantly and may accordingly reduce the effectiveness of the augmentation procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4300889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43008892015-02-18 Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study Krüger, Antonio Oberkircher, Ludwig Kratz, Marita Baroud, Gamal Becker, Stephan Ruchholtz, Steffen Int J Spine Surg Full Length Article BACKGROUND: The treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with transpedicular cement augmentation has grown significantly over the last 20 years. There is still uncertainty about long-term and midterm effects of polymethyl methacrylate in trabecular bone. Preservation of the trabecular structures, as well as interdigitation of the cement with the surrounding bone, therefore has been gaining increasing attention. Interdigitation of cement is likely relevant for biological healing and the biomechanical augmentation process. In this study a cutting and grinding technique was used to evaluate the interdigitation for 4 augmentation techniques. METHODS: By use of a standardized protocol, wedge fractures were created in vertebrae taken from a fresh-frozen spine. Thereafter the vertebrae were assigned to 1 of 4 similar groups with regard to the vertebral size and force required to produce the fracture. The 4 groups were randomized to the following augmentation techniques: balloon kyphoplasty, radiofrequency (RF) kyphoplasty, shield kyphoplasty, and vertebral stenting. Histologic analysis was designed to examine the bone structure and interdigitation after the augmentation. RESULTS: For the void-creating procedures, the distance between bone and cement was 341.4 ± 173.7 µm and 413.6 ± 167.6 µm for vertebral stenting and balloon kyphoplasty, respectively. Specifically, the trabecular bone was condensed around the cement, forming a shield of condensed bone. The procedures without a balloon resulted in shorter distances of 151.2 ± 111.4 µm and 228.1 ± 183.6 µm for RF and shield kyphoplasty, respectively. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .0001). The percentage of interdigitation was higher for the procedures that did not use a balloon: 16.7% ± 9.7% for balloon kyphoplasty, 20.5% ± 12.9% for vertebral stenting, 66.45% ± 12.35% for RF kyphoplasty, and 48.61% ± 20.56% for shield kyphoplasty. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity-creating procedures reduce the cement interdigitation significantly and may accordingly reduce the effectiveness of the augmentation procedures. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300889/ /pubmed/25694880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.005 Text en © 2012 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Krüger, Antonio Oberkircher, Ludwig Kratz, Marita Baroud, Gamal Becker, Stephan Ruchholtz, Steffen Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study |
title | Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study |
title_full | Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study |
title_fullStr | Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study |
title_short | Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study |
title_sort | cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: a cadaveric study |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krugerantonio cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy AT oberkircherludwig cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy AT kratzmarita cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy AT baroudgamal cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy AT beckerstephan cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy AT ruchholtzsteffen cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy |