Cargando…

Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND: The treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with transpedicular cement augmentation has grown significantly over the last 20 years. There is still uncertainty about long-term and midterm effects of polymethyl methacrylate in trabecular bone. Preservation of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krüger, Antonio, Oberkircher, Ludwig, Kratz, Marita, Baroud, Gamal, Becker, Stephan, Ruchholtz, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.005
_version_ 1782353582028226560
author Krüger, Antonio
Oberkircher, Ludwig
Kratz, Marita
Baroud, Gamal
Becker, Stephan
Ruchholtz, Steffen
author_facet Krüger, Antonio
Oberkircher, Ludwig
Kratz, Marita
Baroud, Gamal
Becker, Stephan
Ruchholtz, Steffen
author_sort Krüger, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with transpedicular cement augmentation has grown significantly over the last 20 years. There is still uncertainty about long-term and midterm effects of polymethyl methacrylate in trabecular bone. Preservation of the trabecular structures, as well as interdigitation of the cement with the surrounding bone, therefore has been gaining increasing attention. Interdigitation of cement is likely relevant for biological healing and the biomechanical augmentation process. In this study a cutting and grinding technique was used to evaluate the interdigitation for 4 augmentation techniques. METHODS: By use of a standardized protocol, wedge fractures were created in vertebrae taken from a fresh-frozen spine. Thereafter the vertebrae were assigned to 1 of 4 similar groups with regard to the vertebral size and force required to produce the fracture. The 4 groups were randomized to the following augmentation techniques: balloon kyphoplasty, radiofrequency (RF) kyphoplasty, shield kyphoplasty, and vertebral stenting. Histologic analysis was designed to examine the bone structure and interdigitation after the augmentation. RESULTS: For the void-creating procedures, the distance between bone and cement was 341.4 ± 173.7 µm and 413.6 ± 167.6 µm for vertebral stenting and balloon kyphoplasty, respectively. Specifically, the trabecular bone was condensed around the cement, forming a shield of condensed bone. The procedures without a balloon resulted in shorter distances of 151.2 ± 111.4 µm and 228.1 ± 183.6 µm for RF and shield kyphoplasty, respectively. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .0001). The percentage of interdigitation was higher for the procedures that did not use a balloon: 16.7% ± 9.7% for balloon kyphoplasty, 20.5% ± 12.9% for vertebral stenting, 66.45% ± 12.35% for RF kyphoplasty, and 48.61% ± 20.56% for shield kyphoplasty. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity-creating procedures reduce the cement interdigitation significantly and may accordingly reduce the effectiveness of the augmentation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43008892015-02-18 Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study Krüger, Antonio Oberkircher, Ludwig Kratz, Marita Baroud, Gamal Becker, Stephan Ruchholtz, Steffen Int J Spine Surg Full Length Article BACKGROUND: The treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with transpedicular cement augmentation has grown significantly over the last 20 years. There is still uncertainty about long-term and midterm effects of polymethyl methacrylate in trabecular bone. Preservation of the trabecular structures, as well as interdigitation of the cement with the surrounding bone, therefore has been gaining increasing attention. Interdigitation of cement is likely relevant for biological healing and the biomechanical augmentation process. In this study a cutting and grinding technique was used to evaluate the interdigitation for 4 augmentation techniques. METHODS: By use of a standardized protocol, wedge fractures were created in vertebrae taken from a fresh-frozen spine. Thereafter the vertebrae were assigned to 1 of 4 similar groups with regard to the vertebral size and force required to produce the fracture. The 4 groups were randomized to the following augmentation techniques: balloon kyphoplasty, radiofrequency (RF) kyphoplasty, shield kyphoplasty, and vertebral stenting. Histologic analysis was designed to examine the bone structure and interdigitation after the augmentation. RESULTS: For the void-creating procedures, the distance between bone and cement was 341.4 ± 173.7 µm and 413.6 ± 167.6 µm for vertebral stenting and balloon kyphoplasty, respectively. Specifically, the trabecular bone was condensed around the cement, forming a shield of condensed bone. The procedures without a balloon resulted in shorter distances of 151.2 ± 111.4 µm and 228.1 ± 183.6 µm for RF and shield kyphoplasty, respectively. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .0001). The percentage of interdigitation was higher for the procedures that did not use a balloon: 16.7% ± 9.7% for balloon kyphoplasty, 20.5% ± 12.9% for vertebral stenting, 66.45% ± 12.35% for RF kyphoplasty, and 48.61% ± 20.56% for shield kyphoplasty. The difference among the groups was highly significant (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity-creating procedures reduce the cement interdigitation significantly and may accordingly reduce the effectiveness of the augmentation procedures. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300889/ /pubmed/25694880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.005 Text en © 2012 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Krüger, Antonio
Oberkircher, Ludwig
Kratz, Marita
Baroud, Gamal
Becker, Stephan
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
title Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
title_full Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
title_fullStr Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
title_full_unstemmed Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
title_short Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: A cadaveric study
title_sort cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: a cadaveric study
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT krugerantonio cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy
AT oberkircherludwig cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy
AT kratzmarita cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy
AT baroudgamal cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy
AT beckerstephan cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy
AT ruchholtzsteffen cementinterdigitationandbonecementinterfaceafteraugmentingfracturedvertebraeacadavericstudy