Cargando…

Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management

BACKGROUND: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous collection of connective tissue disorders characterized by varying degrees of skin hyperextensibility, joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. Surgical treatment of EDS patients is complicated by the extreme fragility of their vessels an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindley, Emily M., Patti, Brianna N., Taylor, Matthew, Burger, Evalina L., Patel, Vikas V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.006
_version_ 1782353582259961856
author Lindley, Emily M.
Patti, Brianna N.
Taylor, Matthew
Burger, Evalina L.
Patel, Vikas V.
author_facet Lindley, Emily M.
Patti, Brianna N.
Taylor, Matthew
Burger, Evalina L.
Patel, Vikas V.
author_sort Lindley, Emily M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous collection of connective tissue disorders characterized by varying degrees of skin hyperextensibility, joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. Surgical treatment of EDS patients is complicated by the extreme fragility of their vessels and tissues. The purpose of this case report is to present the management of an EDS patient with debilitating low-back pain. METHODS: A 52-year-old woman with a clinical diagnosis of EDS presented with degenerative disc disease at L4-5 that had not been alleviated by previous microdiscectomies. The clinical course, decision-making process, and treatment are discussed in this case report. RESULTS: The patient was referred for genetic evaluation, which classified her with type III EDS, or hypermobility type. We presented the patient with the risks and benefits of fusion versus artificial disc replacement (ADR), particularly with regard to her EDS diagnosis of the hypermobility subtype. Given the patient's lack of extreme spinal hypermobility on examination and the absence of clear contraindications regarding ADR in type III EDS, the decision was made to proceed with ADR. There were no surgical complications, and the patient's low-back pain and radicular symptoms resolved with no evidence of implant migration or hypermobility at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In this case report, the referral to a geneticist and consultation with a vascular surgeon were integral steps in the decision to proceed with surgery. Although the clarified diagnosis of type III EDS did not eliminate the potential risk for vascular compromise during surgery, it placed the patient at lower risk than patients with other subtypes of EDS. Similarly, her lack of extreme hypermobility made us more comfortable with pursuing ADR. Although we emphasize extreme caution when considering surgical treatment, this case report suggests that some patients with less severe forms of EDS may be able to successfully undergo anterior spine surgery, including ADR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43008902015-02-18 Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management Lindley, Emily M. Patti, Brianna N. Taylor, Matthew Burger, Evalina L. Patel, Vikas V. Int J Spine Surg Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous collection of connective tissue disorders characterized by varying degrees of skin hyperextensibility, joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. Surgical treatment of EDS patients is complicated by the extreme fragility of their vessels and tissues. The purpose of this case report is to present the management of an EDS patient with debilitating low-back pain. METHODS: A 52-year-old woman with a clinical diagnosis of EDS presented with degenerative disc disease at L4-5 that had not been alleviated by previous microdiscectomies. The clinical course, decision-making process, and treatment are discussed in this case report. RESULTS: The patient was referred for genetic evaluation, which classified her with type III EDS, or hypermobility type. We presented the patient with the risks and benefits of fusion versus artificial disc replacement (ADR), particularly with regard to her EDS diagnosis of the hypermobility subtype. Given the patient's lack of extreme spinal hypermobility on examination and the absence of clear contraindications regarding ADR in type III EDS, the decision was made to proceed with ADR. There were no surgical complications, and the patient's low-back pain and radicular symptoms resolved with no evidence of implant migration or hypermobility at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In this case report, the referral to a geneticist and consultation with a vascular surgeon were integral steps in the decision to proceed with surgery. Although the clarified diagnosis of type III EDS did not eliminate the potential risk for vascular compromise during surgery, it placed the patient at lower risk than patients with other subtypes of EDS. Similarly, her lack of extreme hypermobility made us more comfortable with pursuing ADR. Although we emphasize extreme caution when considering surgical treatment, this case report suggests that some patients with less severe forms of EDS may be able to successfully undergo anterior spine surgery, including ADR. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300890/ /pubmed/25694881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.006 Text en © 2012 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Lindley, Emily M.
Patti, Brianna N.
Taylor, Matthew
Burger, Evalina L.
Patel, Vikas V.
Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management
title Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management
title_full Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management
title_fullStr Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management
title_short Lumbar artificial disc replacement in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A case report and discussion of clinical management
title_sort lumbar artificial disc replacement in ehlers-danlos syndrome: a case report and discussion of clinical management
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.006
work_keys_str_mv AT lindleyemilym lumbarartificialdiscreplacementinehlersdanlossyndromeacasereportanddiscussionofclinicalmanagement
AT pattibriannan lumbarartificialdiscreplacementinehlersdanlossyndromeacasereportanddiscussionofclinicalmanagement
AT taylormatthew lumbarartificialdiscreplacementinehlersdanlossyndromeacasereportanddiscussionofclinicalmanagement
AT burgerevalinal lumbarartificialdiscreplacementinehlersdanlossyndromeacasereportanddiscussionofclinicalmanagement
AT patelvikasv lumbarartificialdiscreplacementinehlersdanlossyndromeacasereportanddiscussionofclinicalmanagement