Cargando…

Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement

BACKGROUND: Fusion has long been used for treating chronic back pain unresponsive to nonoperative care. However, potential development of adjacent segment degeneration resulting in reoperation is a concern. Total disc replacement (TDR) has been proposed as a method for addressing back pain and preve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rainey, Scott, Blumenthal, Scott L., Zigler, Jack E., Guyer, Richard D., Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.007
_version_ 1782353582499037184
author Rainey, Scott
Blumenthal, Scott L.
Zigler, Jack E.
Guyer, Richard D.
Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
author_facet Rainey, Scott
Blumenthal, Scott L.
Zigler, Jack E.
Guyer, Richard D.
Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
author_sort Rainey, Scott
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fusion has long been used for treating chronic back pain unresponsive to nonoperative care. However, potential development of adjacent segment degeneration resulting in reoperation is a concern. Total disc replacement (TDR) has been proposed as a method for addressing back pain and preventing or reducing adjacent segment degeneration. The purpose of the study was to determine the reoperation rate at the segment adjacent to a level implanted with a lumbar TDR and to analyze the pre-TDR condition of the adjacent segment. METHODS: This study was based on a retrospective review of charts and radiographs from a consecutive series of 1000 TDR patients to identify those who underwent reoperation because of adjacent segment degeneration. Some of the patients were part of randomized studies comparing TDR with fusion. Adjacent segment reoperation data were also collected from 67 patients who were randomized to fusion in those studies. The condition of the adjacent segment before the index surgery was compared with its condition before reoperation based on radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography. RESULTS: Of the 1000 TDR patients, 20 (2.0%) underwent reoperation. The mean length of time from arthroplasty to reoperation was 28.3 months (range, 0.5–85 months). Of the adjacent segments evaluated on preoperative MRI, 38.8% were normal, 38.8% were moderately diseased, and 22.2% were classified as having severe degeneration. None of these levels had a different grading at the time of reoperation compared with the pre-TDR MRI study. Reoperation for adjacent segment degeneration was performed in 4.5% of the fusion patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 2.0% rate of adjacent segment degeneration resulting in reoperation in this study is similar to the 2.0% to 2.8% range in other studies and lower than the published rates of 7% to 18% after lumbar fusion. By carefully assessing the presence of pre-existing degenerative changes before performing arthroplasty, this rate may be reduced even more.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43008912015-02-18 Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement Rainey, Scott Blumenthal, Scott L. Zigler, Jack E. Guyer, Richard D. Ohnmeiss, Donna D. Int J Spine Surg Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Fusion has long been used for treating chronic back pain unresponsive to nonoperative care. However, potential development of adjacent segment degeneration resulting in reoperation is a concern. Total disc replacement (TDR) has been proposed as a method for addressing back pain and preventing or reducing adjacent segment degeneration. The purpose of the study was to determine the reoperation rate at the segment adjacent to a level implanted with a lumbar TDR and to analyze the pre-TDR condition of the adjacent segment. METHODS: This study was based on a retrospective review of charts and radiographs from a consecutive series of 1000 TDR patients to identify those who underwent reoperation because of adjacent segment degeneration. Some of the patients were part of randomized studies comparing TDR with fusion. Adjacent segment reoperation data were also collected from 67 patients who were randomized to fusion in those studies. The condition of the adjacent segment before the index surgery was compared with its condition before reoperation based on radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography. RESULTS: Of the 1000 TDR patients, 20 (2.0%) underwent reoperation. The mean length of time from arthroplasty to reoperation was 28.3 months (range, 0.5–85 months). Of the adjacent segments evaluated on preoperative MRI, 38.8% were normal, 38.8% were moderately diseased, and 22.2% were classified as having severe degeneration. None of these levels had a different grading at the time of reoperation compared with the pre-TDR MRI study. Reoperation for adjacent segment degeneration was performed in 4.5% of the fusion patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 2.0% rate of adjacent segment degeneration resulting in reoperation in this study is similar to the 2.0% to 2.8% range in other studies and lower than the published rates of 7% to 18% after lumbar fusion. By carefully assessing the presence of pre-existing degenerative changes before performing arthroplasty, this rate may be reduced even more. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2012-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300891/ /pubmed/25694883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.007 Text en © 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Rainey, Scott
Blumenthal, Scott L.
Zigler, Jack E.
Guyer, Richard D.
Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
title Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
title_full Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
title_fullStr Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
title_short Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
title_sort analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT raineyscott analysisofadjacentsegmentreoperationafterlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT blumenthalscottl analysisofadjacentsegmentreoperationafterlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT ziglerjacke analysisofadjacentsegmentreoperationafterlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT guyerrichardd analysisofadjacentsegmentreoperationafterlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT ohnmeissdonnad analysisofadjacentsegmentreoperationafterlumbartotaldiscreplacement