Cargando…

Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: Outpatient spinal surgery is becoming increasingly common and in some areas is now the preferred course for certain procedures. Many different procedures, including ACDF, have been examined in the outpatient setting in the past few years but to our knowledge none have included the ambula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tally, William C., Tarabadkar, Sanjiwan, Kovalenko, Boris V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.06.001
_version_ 1782353592548589568
author Tally, William C.
Tarabadkar, Sanjiwan
Kovalenko, Boris V.
author_facet Tally, William C.
Tarabadkar, Sanjiwan
Kovalenko, Boris V.
author_sort Tally, William C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outpatient spinal surgery is becoming increasingly common and in some areas is now the preferred course for certain procedures. Many different procedures, including ACDF, have been examined in the outpatient setting in the past few years but to our knowledge none have included the ambulatory setting. METHODS: All ACDF procedures performed during the time frame of the study were included. Charts were pulled and evaluated using the outcome measures. One and two-level ACDF were divided into respective cervical levels and individually analyzed. RESULTS: Single level ACDF comprised 62% (n = 74) of the total surgeries. Single level ACDF patients averaged a total hospital stay time of 4.7 hours, with a maximum total stay time of 8.2 hours and a minimum stay time of 0.8 hours. Two-level ACDF made up 38% (n = 45) of the total surgeries. The average total stay time for two level ACDF was 5.4 hours, with a maximum time of 9.6 hours and a minimum of 3.4 hours. All patients were comparable in age and gender. There were no major operating complications and neither re-admissions nor deaths after discharge. There were two transfers from ambulatory surgical centers to inpatient status for observation only. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient one and two-level ACDF with plate fixation can safely be done on an outpatient ambulatory basis. The data suggest that all subaxial cervical levels can be treated. Patient fusion and satisfaction data were not obtained and thus cannot be commented upon. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ambulatory ACDF should be considered as a feasible option for reducing hospital stay as well as the associated healthcare costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4300977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43009772015-02-18 Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review Tally, William C. Tarabadkar, Sanjiwan Kovalenko, Boris V. Int J Spine Surg Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Outpatient spinal surgery is becoming increasingly common and in some areas is now the preferred course for certain procedures. Many different procedures, including ACDF, have been examined in the outpatient setting in the past few years but to our knowledge none have included the ambulatory setting. METHODS: All ACDF procedures performed during the time frame of the study were included. Charts were pulled and evaluated using the outcome measures. One and two-level ACDF were divided into respective cervical levels and individually analyzed. RESULTS: Single level ACDF comprised 62% (n = 74) of the total surgeries. Single level ACDF patients averaged a total hospital stay time of 4.7 hours, with a maximum total stay time of 8.2 hours and a minimum stay time of 0.8 hours. Two-level ACDF made up 38% (n = 45) of the total surgeries. The average total stay time for two level ACDF was 5.4 hours, with a maximum time of 9.6 hours and a minimum of 3.4 hours. All patients were comparable in age and gender. There were no major operating complications and neither re-admissions nor deaths after discharge. There were two transfers from ambulatory surgical centers to inpatient status for observation only. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient one and two-level ACDF with plate fixation can safely be done on an outpatient ambulatory basis. The data suggest that all subaxial cervical levels can be treated. Patient fusion and satisfaction data were not obtained and thus cannot be commented upon. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ambulatory ACDF should be considered as a feasible option for reducing hospital stay as well as the associated healthcare costs. Elsevier, Inc. 2013-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4300977/ /pubmed/25694910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.06.001 Text en © 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of ISASS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Tally, William C.
Tarabadkar, Sanjiwan
Kovalenko, Boris V.
Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review
title Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review
title_full Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review
title_fullStr Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review
title_full_unstemmed Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review
title_short Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review
title_sort safety and feasibility of outpatient acdf in an ambulatory setting: a retrospective chart review
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25694910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.06.001
work_keys_str_mv AT tallywilliamc safetyandfeasibilityofoutpatientacdfinanambulatorysettingaretrospectivechartreview
AT tarabadkarsanjiwan safetyandfeasibilityofoutpatientacdfinanambulatorysettingaretrospectivechartreview
AT kovalenkoborisv safetyandfeasibilityofoutpatientacdfinanambulatorysettingaretrospectivechartreview