Cargando…

Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists

Protective mutualisms, where a symbiont reduces the negative effects of another species on a shared host, represent a common type of species interaction in natural communities, yet it is still unclear what ecological conditions might favor their emergence. Studies suggest that the initial evolution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poisot, Timothée, Bever, James D, Thrall, Peter H, Hochberg, Michael E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25614798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1151
_version_ 1782353606099337216
author Poisot, Timothée
Bever, James D
Thrall, Peter H
Hochberg, Michael E
author_facet Poisot, Timothée
Bever, James D
Thrall, Peter H
Hochberg, Michael E
author_sort Poisot, Timothée
collection PubMed
description Protective mutualisms, where a symbiont reduces the negative effects of another species on a shared host, represent a common type of species interaction in natural communities, yet it is still unclear what ecological conditions might favor their emergence. Studies suggest that the initial evolution of protective mutualists might involve closely related pathogenic variants with similar life histories, but different competitive abilities and impacts on host fitness. We derive a model to evaluate this hypothesis and show that, in general, a protective variant cannot spread from rarity or exclude a more pathogenic strain. While the conditions allowing mutualist invasion are more likely with increased environmental productivity, they still depend on initial densities in the invaded patch exceeding a threshold, highlighting the likely importance of spatial structure and demographic stochasticity. Using a numerical simulation approach, we show that regional coexistence is in fact possible in an explicitly spatial system and that, under some circumstances, the mutualist population can exclude the enemy. More broadly, the establishment of protective mutualists may be favored when there are other life-history differences from more pathogenic symbionts, such as vertical transmission or additional direct benefits to hosts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4301050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43010502015-01-22 Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists Poisot, Timothée Bever, James D Thrall, Peter H Hochberg, Michael E Ecol Evol Original Research Protective mutualisms, where a symbiont reduces the negative effects of another species on a shared host, represent a common type of species interaction in natural communities, yet it is still unclear what ecological conditions might favor their emergence. Studies suggest that the initial evolution of protective mutualists might involve closely related pathogenic variants with similar life histories, but different competitive abilities and impacts on host fitness. We derive a model to evaluate this hypothesis and show that, in general, a protective variant cannot spread from rarity or exclude a more pathogenic strain. While the conditions allowing mutualist invasion are more likely with increased environmental productivity, they still depend on initial densities in the invaded patch exceeding a threshold, highlighting the likely importance of spatial structure and demographic stochasticity. Using a numerical simulation approach, we show that regional coexistence is in fact possible in an explicitly spatial system and that, under some circumstances, the mutualist population can exclude the enemy. More broadly, the establishment of protective mutualists may be favored when there are other life-history differences from more pathogenic symbionts, such as vertical transmission or additional direct benefits to hosts. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4301050/ /pubmed/25614798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1151 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Poisot, Timothée
Bever, James D
Thrall, Peter H
Hochberg, Michael E
Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
title Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
title_full Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
title_fullStr Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
title_full_unstemmed Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
title_short Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
title_sort dispersal and spatial heterogeneity allow coexistence between enemies and protective mutualists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25614798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1151
work_keys_str_mv AT poisottimothee dispersalandspatialheterogeneityallowcoexistencebetweenenemiesandprotectivemutualists
AT beverjamesd dispersalandspatialheterogeneityallowcoexistencebetweenenemiesandprotectivemutualists
AT thrallpeterh dispersalandspatialheterogeneityallowcoexistencebetweenenemiesandprotectivemutualists
AT hochbergmichaele dispersalandspatialheterogeneityallowcoexistencebetweenenemiesandprotectivemutualists