Cargando…

Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)

Background: SCORE, OST and ORAI risk assessment tools could reduce the cost burden of BMD tests by selecting the high risk patients to osteoporosis. In this study we compared the ability of these risk assessment measures to assess probability of the osteoporosis among post-menopausal women. Methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadzadeh, Arman, Emam, Mohammadmehdi, Rajaei, Alireza, Moslemizadeh, Mohammad, Jalessi, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25664295
_version_ 1782353628359557120
author Ahmadzadeh, Arman
Emam, Mohammadmehdi
Rajaei, Alireza
Moslemizadeh, Mohammad
Jalessi, Maryam
author_facet Ahmadzadeh, Arman
Emam, Mohammadmehdi
Rajaei, Alireza
Moslemizadeh, Mohammad
Jalessi, Maryam
author_sort Ahmadzadeh, Arman
collection PubMed
description Background: SCORE, OST and ORAI risk assessment tools could reduce the cost burden of BMD tests by selecting the high risk patients to osteoporosis. In this study we compared the ability of these risk assessment measures to assess probability of the osteoporosis among post-menopausal women. Methods: 211 post-menopausal women aged 45-88 years enrolled into the study. All of the patients underwent BMD test and divided into two groups according to T-Score level. 43 patients (20.4%) had T-Score ≤-2.5 (osteoporotic) (group-1) and 168 (70.6%) patients had T-Score of > -2.5 (non-osteoporotic). Among 168 nonosteoporotic cases, 88 had -2.5≤T-Score≤-2 in at least one bony area. These 88 cases in addition to the 43 cases with -2.5≤T-Score considered as high risk group to osteoporosis (group 2). Afterward, SCORE, OST and ORAI risk scores were calculated and sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, accuracy index and area under the curve of each tool were determined in both groups and then compared with each other. Results: SCORE had the highest sensitivity compared with others in both groups (95% and 88.2% respectively). Moreover, it had the highest diagnostic odds ratio and negative predictive value between the three methods. OST had the highest likelihood ratio and specificity in both groups (71.4% and 75.4%). There was significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of the tests (p= 0.004 and 0.027). Conclusion: OST with the highest specificity and positive LR had a special role in determining the osteoporotic patients and SCORE with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value had an exceptional role in exclusion of the non- osteoporotic individuals. However, considering the area under the curve, there was no significant difference among these three methods in determining osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4301225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43012252015-02-06 Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool) Ahmadzadeh, Arman Emam, Mohammadmehdi Rajaei, Alireza Moslemizadeh, Mohammad Jalessi, Maryam Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: SCORE, OST and ORAI risk assessment tools could reduce the cost burden of BMD tests by selecting the high risk patients to osteoporosis. In this study we compared the ability of these risk assessment measures to assess probability of the osteoporosis among post-menopausal women. Methods: 211 post-menopausal women aged 45-88 years enrolled into the study. All of the patients underwent BMD test and divided into two groups according to T-Score level. 43 patients (20.4%) had T-Score ≤-2.5 (osteoporotic) (group-1) and 168 (70.6%) patients had T-Score of > -2.5 (non-osteoporotic). Among 168 nonosteoporotic cases, 88 had -2.5≤T-Score≤-2 in at least one bony area. These 88 cases in addition to the 43 cases with -2.5≤T-Score considered as high risk group to osteoporosis (group 2). Afterward, SCORE, OST and ORAI risk scores were calculated and sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, accuracy index and area under the curve of each tool were determined in both groups and then compared with each other. Results: SCORE had the highest sensitivity compared with others in both groups (95% and 88.2% respectively). Moreover, it had the highest diagnostic odds ratio and negative predictive value between the three methods. OST had the highest likelihood ratio and specificity in both groups (71.4% and 75.4%). There was significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of the tests (p= 0.004 and 0.027). Conclusion: OST with the highest specificity and positive LR had a special role in determining the osteoporotic patients and SCORE with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value had an exceptional role in exclusion of the non- osteoporotic individuals. However, considering the area under the curve, there was no significant difference among these three methods in determining osteoporosis. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4301225/ /pubmed/25664295 Text en © 2014 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmadzadeh, Arman
Emam, Mohammadmehdi
Rajaei, Alireza
Moslemizadeh, Mohammad
Jalessi, Maryam
Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
title Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
title_full Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
title_fullStr Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
title_short Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
title_sort comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: orai (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), score (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and ost (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25664295
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadzadeharman comparisonofthreedifferentosteoporosisriskassessmenttoolsoraiosteoporosisriskassessmentinstrumentscoresimplecalculatedosteoporosisriskestimationandostosteoporosisselfassessmenttool
AT emammohammadmehdi comparisonofthreedifferentosteoporosisriskassessmenttoolsoraiosteoporosisriskassessmentinstrumentscoresimplecalculatedosteoporosisriskestimationandostosteoporosisselfassessmenttool
AT rajaeialireza comparisonofthreedifferentosteoporosisriskassessmenttoolsoraiosteoporosisriskassessmentinstrumentscoresimplecalculatedosteoporosisriskestimationandostosteoporosisselfassessmenttool
AT moslemizadehmohammad comparisonofthreedifferentosteoporosisriskassessmenttoolsoraiosteoporosisriskassessmentinstrumentscoresimplecalculatedosteoporosisriskestimationandostosteoporosisselfassessmenttool
AT jalessimaryam comparisonofthreedifferentosteoporosisriskassessmenttoolsoraiosteoporosisriskassessmentinstrumentscoresimplecalculatedosteoporosisriskestimationandostosteoporosisselfassessmenttool