Cargando…

Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species

BACKGROUND: Grain aphid (Sitobion avenae F) and pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are two agriculturally important pest species, which cause significant yield losses to crop plants each year by inflicting damage both through the direct effects of feeding and by vectoring debilitating plant viruses. Al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Dahai, Liu, Qi, Jones, Huw D, Bruce, Toby, Xia, Lanqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1023
_version_ 1782353682429378560
author Wang, Dahai
Liu, Qi
Jones, Huw D
Bruce, Toby
Xia, Lanqin
author_facet Wang, Dahai
Liu, Qi
Jones, Huw D
Bruce, Toby
Xia, Lanqin
author_sort Wang, Dahai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Grain aphid (Sitobion avenae F) and pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are two agriculturally important pest species, which cause significant yield losses to crop plants each year by inflicting damage both through the direct effects of feeding and by vectoring debilitating plant viruses. Although a close phylogenetic relationship between grain aphid and pea aphid was proposed, the biological variations between these two aphid species are obvious. While the host ranges of grain aphid is restricted to cereal crops and in particular wheat, that of pea aphid is wider, mainly colonizing leguminous plant species. Until now, the genetic factors underlying the divergence between grain aphid and pea aphid still remain unclear due to the limited genomic data of grain aphid available in public databases. RESULTS: Based on a set of transcriptome data of grain aphid generated by using Roche 454 GS-FLX pyrosequencing, comparative analysis between this set of transcriptome data of grain aphid and mRNA sequences of pea aphid available in the public databases was performed. Compared with mRNA sequences of pea aphid, 4,857 unigenes were found to be specifically presented in the transcriptome of grain aphid under the rearing conditions described in this study. Furthermore, 3,368 orthologous pairs which could be calculated with both nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitutions were used to infer their sequence divergences. The average differences in the coding, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions of these orthologs were 10.53%, 21.29% and 18.96%, respectively. Moreover, of 340 orthologs which were identified to have evolved in response to positive selection based on the rates of Ka and Ks substitutions, 186 were predicted to be involved in secondary metabolism and xenobiotic metabolisms which might contribute to the divergence of these two aphid species. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive transcriptome divergent sequence analysis between grain aphid and pea aphid provides an invaluable resource for the investigation of genes involved in host plant adaptation and evolution. Moreover, the demonstration of divergent transcriptome sequences between grain aphid and pea aphid pave the way for the investigation of the molecular mechanisms underpinning the biological variations of these two agriculturally important aphid species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-1023) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4301665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43016652015-01-22 Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species Wang, Dahai Liu, Qi Jones, Huw D Bruce, Toby Xia, Lanqin BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Grain aphid (Sitobion avenae F) and pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are two agriculturally important pest species, which cause significant yield losses to crop plants each year by inflicting damage both through the direct effects of feeding and by vectoring debilitating plant viruses. Although a close phylogenetic relationship between grain aphid and pea aphid was proposed, the biological variations between these two aphid species are obvious. While the host ranges of grain aphid is restricted to cereal crops and in particular wheat, that of pea aphid is wider, mainly colonizing leguminous plant species. Until now, the genetic factors underlying the divergence between grain aphid and pea aphid still remain unclear due to the limited genomic data of grain aphid available in public databases. RESULTS: Based on a set of transcriptome data of grain aphid generated by using Roche 454 GS-FLX pyrosequencing, comparative analysis between this set of transcriptome data of grain aphid and mRNA sequences of pea aphid available in the public databases was performed. Compared with mRNA sequences of pea aphid, 4,857 unigenes were found to be specifically presented in the transcriptome of grain aphid under the rearing conditions described in this study. Furthermore, 3,368 orthologous pairs which could be calculated with both nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitutions were used to infer their sequence divergences. The average differences in the coding, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions of these orthologs were 10.53%, 21.29% and 18.96%, respectively. Moreover, of 340 orthologs which were identified to have evolved in response to positive selection based on the rates of Ka and Ks substitutions, 186 were predicted to be involved in secondary metabolism and xenobiotic metabolisms which might contribute to the divergence of these two aphid species. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive transcriptome divergent sequence analysis between grain aphid and pea aphid provides an invaluable resource for the investigation of genes involved in host plant adaptation and evolution. Moreover, the demonstration of divergent transcriptome sequences between grain aphid and pea aphid pave the way for the investigation of the molecular mechanisms underpinning the biological variations of these two agriculturally important aphid species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-1023) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4301665/ /pubmed/25424897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1023 Text en © Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Dahai
Liu, Qi
Jones, Huw D
Bruce, Toby
Xia, Lanqin
Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
title Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
title_full Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
title_fullStr Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
title_full_unstemmed Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
title_short Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
title_sort comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed divergences of two agriculturally important aphid species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1023
work_keys_str_mv AT wangdahai comparativetranscriptomicanalysesrevealeddivergencesoftwoagriculturallyimportantaphidspecies
AT liuqi comparativetranscriptomicanalysesrevealeddivergencesoftwoagriculturallyimportantaphidspecies
AT joneshuwd comparativetranscriptomicanalysesrevealeddivergencesoftwoagriculturallyimportantaphidspecies
AT brucetoby comparativetranscriptomicanalysesrevealeddivergencesoftwoagriculturallyimportantaphidspecies
AT xialanqin comparativetranscriptomicanalysesrevealeddivergencesoftwoagriculturallyimportantaphidspecies