Cargando…

The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation

BACKGROUND: Pain and anxiety occurring from cardiovascular disease are associated with long-term health risks. Integrative medicine (IM) therapies reduce pain and anxiety in small samples of hospitalized cardiovascular patients within randomized controlled trials; however, practice-based effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Jill R, Crespin, Daniel J, Griffin, Kristen H, Finch, Michael D, Rivard, Rachael L, Baechler, Courtney J, Dusek, Jeffery A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25494710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-486
_version_ 1782353691072790528
author Johnson, Jill R
Crespin, Daniel J
Griffin, Kristen H
Finch, Michael D
Rivard, Rachael L
Baechler, Courtney J
Dusek, Jeffery A
author_facet Johnson, Jill R
Crespin, Daniel J
Griffin, Kristen H
Finch, Michael D
Rivard, Rachael L
Baechler, Courtney J
Dusek, Jeffery A
author_sort Johnson, Jill R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain and anxiety occurring from cardiovascular disease are associated with long-term health risks. Integrative medicine (IM) therapies reduce pain and anxiety in small samples of hospitalized cardiovascular patients within randomized controlled trials; however, practice-based effectiveness research has been limited. The goal of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of IM interventions (i.e., bodywork, mind-body and energy therapies, and traditional Chinese medicine) on pain and anxiety measures across a cardiovascular population. METHODS: Retrospective data obtained from medical records identified patients with a cardiovascular ICD-9 code admitted to a large Midwestern hospital between 7/1/2009 and 12/31/2012. Outcomes were changes in patient-reported pain and anxiety, rated before and after IM treatments based on a numeric scale (0-10). RESULTS: Of 57,295 hospital cardiovascular admissions, 6,589 (11.5%) included IM. After receiving IM therapy, patients averaged a 46.5% (p-value < 0.001) decrease in pain and a 54.8% (p-value < 0.001) decrease in anxiety. There was no difference between treatment modalities on pain reduction; however, mind-body and energy therapies (p-value < 0.01), traditional Chinese medicine (p-value < 0.05), and combination therapies (p-value < 0.01) were more effective at reducing anxiety than bodywork therapies. Each additional year of age reduced the odds of receiving any IM therapy by two percent (OR: 0.98, p-value < 0.01) and females had 96% (OR: 1.96, p-value < 0.01) higher odds of receiving any IM therapy compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular inpatients reported statistically significant decreases in pain and anxiety following care with adjunctive IM interventions. This study underscores the potential for future practice-based research to investigate the best approach for incorporating these therapies into an acute care setting such that IM therapies are most appropriately provided to patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4301797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43017972015-01-22 The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation Johnson, Jill R Crespin, Daniel J Griffin, Kristen H Finch, Michael D Rivard, Rachael L Baechler, Courtney J Dusek, Jeffery A BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Pain and anxiety occurring from cardiovascular disease are associated with long-term health risks. Integrative medicine (IM) therapies reduce pain and anxiety in small samples of hospitalized cardiovascular patients within randomized controlled trials; however, practice-based effectiveness research has been limited. The goal of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of IM interventions (i.e., bodywork, mind-body and energy therapies, and traditional Chinese medicine) on pain and anxiety measures across a cardiovascular population. METHODS: Retrospective data obtained from medical records identified patients with a cardiovascular ICD-9 code admitted to a large Midwestern hospital between 7/1/2009 and 12/31/2012. Outcomes were changes in patient-reported pain and anxiety, rated before and after IM treatments based on a numeric scale (0-10). RESULTS: Of 57,295 hospital cardiovascular admissions, 6,589 (11.5%) included IM. After receiving IM therapy, patients averaged a 46.5% (p-value < 0.001) decrease in pain and a 54.8% (p-value < 0.001) decrease in anxiety. There was no difference between treatment modalities on pain reduction; however, mind-body and energy therapies (p-value < 0.01), traditional Chinese medicine (p-value < 0.05), and combination therapies (p-value < 0.01) were more effective at reducing anxiety than bodywork therapies. Each additional year of age reduced the odds of receiving any IM therapy by two percent (OR: 0.98, p-value < 0.01) and females had 96% (OR: 1.96, p-value < 0.01) higher odds of receiving any IM therapy compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular inpatients reported statistically significant decreases in pain and anxiety following care with adjunctive IM interventions. This study underscores the potential for future practice-based research to investigate the best approach for incorporating these therapies into an acute care setting such that IM therapies are most appropriately provided to patient populations. BioMed Central 2014-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4301797/ /pubmed/25494710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-486 Text en © Johnson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Jill R
Crespin, Daniel J
Griffin, Kristen H
Finch, Michael D
Rivard, Rachael L
Baechler, Courtney J
Dusek, Jeffery A
The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
title The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
title_full The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
title_fullStr The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
title_short The effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
title_sort effectiveness of integrative medicine interventions on pain and anxiety in cardiovascular inpatients: a practice-based research evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25494710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-486
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjillr theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT crespindanielj theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT griffinkristenh theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT finchmichaeld theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT rivardrachaell theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT baechlercourtneyj theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT dusekjefferya theeffectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT johnsonjillr effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT crespindanielj effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT griffinkristenh effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT finchmichaeld effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT rivardrachaell effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT baechlercourtneyj effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation
AT dusekjefferya effectivenessofintegrativemedicineinterventionsonpainandanxietyincardiovascularinpatientsapracticebasedresearchevaluation